BioNTech, Moderna Lobby To Stop EU 'Gene Therapy' Classification
Panic at the disco
Angelus caelorum raised awareness that BioNTech (partnered with Pfizer) and Moderna are desperately lobbying to try to stop a revision by the EU to classify the SARS-CoV-2 shots as ‘Gene Therapy’.
The lobbying refers to activities done by BioNTech and Moderna at the suspiciously named ‘Kangaroo Group’ (which brings to mind things like ‘Kangaroo Court’). It was hosted back in January, at a fancy, taxpayer funded lunch:
Digging Out The Lobbyists
Lobbying the EU are Moderna’s “Dr Maren Von Fritschen”, who used to work for Kalms Consulting, a lobbyist firm (a lobbyist doctor for hire, basically)…
…and BioNTech’s lobbyist “Dr. Constanze Blume”, who claims to work in oncology (cancer research)…
…and appeared as a speaker for the ‘mRNA conference’ (no doubt hoping to cash in at your expense):
In a corrupt, small, small, world, FDA biologics approver Peter Marks also appeared (most likely as a paid speaker) at the same mRNA conference too (isn’t he supposed to be neutral?):
Constanze Blume appears on LinkedIn (with a radically different appearance — maybe trying to hide from the angry mobs?)…
…but we can confirm it is the same one, as she also shares Dr Maren Von Fritschen’s bragging about lobbying the regulators…
…a post that says anyone trying to hold these vaccine mass murderers to account is spreading ‘misinformation’, which is pretty fresh coming from a paid-for, factless “consultant” who gets paid bribe money to mislead EU decision making for pharmaceutical profit…
Translation: the mRNA shills are desperate that the harms don’t get formally acknowledged and want to declare anyone who disagrees with them are ‘misinformation’.
Such a post had gushing nonsense in the comments section brownnosing how wonderful the lobbying was (noticably pharmaceutical in origin)…
Anyway, we can also further confirm this LinkedIn is the same Constanze Blume as they’re also seen promoting the COVID-19 shot in the EU…
So, what do these hoity-toity vaccine shills want…?
Kangaroo Court In Session
A copy of the ‘Kangaroo Group’ flyer can be found here:
Quoting the earlier highlighted excerpt of their lobbying:
In this context, it is important that the GPL provides a clear and broad scope for the definition of Platform Technologies, as well as a clear demarcation between Gene Therapies Medicinal Products that alter human genomes, and those that do not (e.g. mRNA).
The premise rests on the flawed assumption that the technology behind the mRNA shots does not alter DNA, which simply not the case.
We know:
That plasmids can integrate into cell DNA without transfectants
That cancer cases were rising post-shot rollout (a sudden massive rise in cancer post-shot means a rise in genetic mutations within people’s DNA, A.K.A. genetic modification)
That pharmaceutical firms got into bed with each other expecting massive amounts of cancer cases
That Moderna’s future profit model literally rests on selling so-called ‘cancer shots’ (cancer, caused by genetic mutations in DNA)
We also know that:
The mRNA is unstable (verified by BMJ) and this issue has never been rectified
The use of N1-methylpseudouridylation in the mRNA causes frameshifting (put simply: mistranslated, and thus, mangled spike proteins)
The mRNA has truncated transcripts (this means infinite spike protein)
Pfizer committed Western blot data fraud (used to ‘verify’ their shots were ‘safe’ and didn’t do nasty DNA shit like we’re seeing now)
Pfizer lied and omitted any mention of the SV40 promoter from their plasmid declaration to the EMA
Pfizer’s clinical trial data is bogus (and even used old school racism to cover up clinical harms)
So the idea these shots do not modify DNA at this stage is patently absurd.
At this point the lobbyist shills are trying to do damage control to prevent the EU from correctly classifying the shots as genetic modification technology, by having a laid back lunch with two female industry shills trying to play verbal ju-jitsu with corrupt regulators.
Colour us unsurprised.
Paying Subscribers Can Now Access
Found this informative?
Help inform?
Thoughts, dear reader?
Well, these ARE in fact, gene therapies and should be labeled, thought of and treated, as such. Now if anyone can explain why healthy populations were mandated to accept these injections, passed off as vaccines, I am listening. Otherwise, this was a big experiment to single out those dissenters and others who just wish for their blood to remain pure of modified synthetic human sludge - those smart enough to know transfection did not sound right at the outset, before shots were even rolled out and Fauci had to come on TV and lie that these were not gene altering injections, when that is exactly what they are, with some test subjects still expressing the spike and blindly accepting booster after booster with zero science to support repeated gene therapy injections are safe.
BioNTech & Moderna: We can't tell people what it actually is, because then they would know what it actually is.