9 Comments
Feb 13·edited Feb 13Liked by The Underdog

Well, these ARE in fact, gene therapies and should be labeled, thought of and treated, as such. Now if anyone can explain why healthy populations were mandated to accept these injections, passed off as vaccines, I am listening. Otherwise, this was a big experiment to single out those dissenters and others who just wish for their blood to remain pure of modified synthetic human sludge - those smart enough to know transfection did not sound right at the outset, before shots were even rolled out and Fauci had to come on TV and lie that these were not gene altering injections, when that is exactly what they are, with some test subjects still expressing the spike and blindly accepting booster after booster with zero science to support repeated gene therapy injections are safe.

Expand full comment

BioNTech & Moderna: We can't tell people what it actually is, because then they would know what it actually is.

Expand full comment
Apr 6Liked by The Underdog

It is a fact that in most territories the regulatory approval framework for gene therapy products is more stringent than for vaccines, holding this class of product to much higher standards of safety than for vaccines.

Though clearly genetic therapies’ (according to submissions made to the US Securities Exchange Commission), Pfizer, Moderna et al. were able to get their Covid vaccines approved under the vaccine umbrella, probably because of political demands of the pandemic ‘emergency’.

It’s clear that Pharma knows they will be unlikely to pull the same trick twice, which is why they have adopted the alternative tactic of wooing regulators to basically reduce safety standards for mRNA based therapeutic products by no longer calling them ‘genetic therapy’.

In an uncertain world this is very concerning.

Perhaps Regulators should be encouraged to review not only the short and long term damage caused by recent so called mRNA vaccines, but also review admitted historical technical failures in bringing the technology to market and whether these have been adequately dealt with, BEFORE lowering standards.

Expand full comment

Inside Pharma stack has an article on the FDA wanting to put a black box warning on the specific mRNA ones designed for cancer - why? Because in trials they were found to cause other cancers! Also, the danger is the LNPs, enveloping the mRNA. Italian chemist presentation on this. vimeo.com/807279310

Expand full comment

I'm not convinced there is any "gene therapy" going on. I have suspicions that what's going on is fear-mongering, and the ingredients are pretty damn nasty, so avoidance is a good idea regardless. Look at it this way: Injections are unhealthy ANYWAY, and always have been. There is nothing NATURAL about injecting something into someone-- Our immune systems are beautiful and amazing without trying to outdo Nature with idiotic conjecture. There is nothing that cannot be cured naturally, IF one knows what to do.

All that said, when a syringe has lethal toxins in it, it doesn't matter whether it's "gene therapy" or not (I am doubting this entire premise of what we think is "genetics" anyway.) Graphene, Mercury, Aluminum, Formaldehyde... WTAF. Just don't let anyone poke a needle into you! There might be one or two exceptions, like if you're going to die from an allergic reaction sort of thing, but... arf.

Expand full comment