Well, these ARE in fact, gene therapies and should be labeled, thought of and treated, as such. Now if anyone can explain why healthy populations were mandated to accept these injections, passed off as vaccines, I am listening. Otherwise, this was a big experiment to single out those dissenters and others who just wish for their blood to remain pure of modified synthetic human sludge - those smart enough to know transfection did not sound right at the outset, before shots were even rolled out and Fauci had to come on TV and lie that these were not gene altering injections, when that is exactly what they are, with some test subjects still expressing the spike and blindly accepting booster after booster with zero science to support repeated gene therapy injections are safe.
B) I know enough to review the SEC filings of both Moderna and Biontech. If you know a bit about SEC filings which public companies are required to make, it is illegal to lie in these filings.
Please use the link and then search the document for the phrase "gene therapy" and you will find statements like this:
" Although we expect to submit BLAs for our mRNA-based product candidates in the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products"
and
"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA."
Are you still curious? Moderna also has the exact same language in their 2019 and 2020 SEC filings. These companies and their FDA/CDC/NIH paid minions have convinced 66% of the planet these products are vaccines, when in fact they are quite the opposite.
So, as noted by The Daily Beagle, the SEC filings do show mRNA should be classified as 'gene therapy' - according to American law (Securities Exchange Commission are, of course, an American agency).
However, if you were to ask me, I feel like even "gene therapy" is still an insufficient placeholder, a red herring, a soft-touch if you will. There's nothing therapeutic about these shots. They're entirely harmful. Poison.
So, the correct term I would use is 'genetic modification' (you will see I use that term through-out the article). It modifies DNA, and it does so in a harmful way. Moderna and BioNTech are fighting over where the Overton window of perception resides - trying to argue that these either 'modify genes therapeutically' or 'don't modify genes'.
I propose there's a third, far more accurate paradigm outside this Orwellian speech control: harmful genetic modification.
I suspect Word Herder's contention is similar to mine; that they're not therapeutic. I think we all agree they modify genes.
Thanks for a great answer. Please do understand that I am very well aware that ANY "vaccine" is toxic. That said, I am also well aware that the entire "virus" concept is fraudulent, or at best mistaken. What I'm curious about is how you know these supposed "truthy" filings are not simply bullshit and the SEC paid off, like the CDC, FDA, et al--- It's not you that I question, it's THEM. Cheers.
It is a fact that in most territories the regulatory approval framework for gene therapy products is more stringent than for vaccines, holding this class of product to much higher standards of safety than for vaccines.
Though clearly genetic therapies’ (according to submissions made to the US Securities Exchange Commission), Pfizer, Moderna et al. were able to get their Covid vaccines approved under the vaccine umbrella, probably because of political demands of the pandemic ‘emergency’.
It’s clear that Pharma knows they will be unlikely to pull the same trick twice, which is why they have adopted the alternative tactic of wooing regulators to basically reduce safety standards for mRNA based therapeutic products by no longer calling them ‘genetic therapy’.
In an uncertain world this is very concerning.
Perhaps Regulators should be encouraged to review not only the short and long term damage caused by recent so called mRNA vaccines, but also review admitted historical technical failures in bringing the technology to market and whether these have been adequately dealt with, BEFORE lowering standards.
Inside Pharma stack has an article on the FDA wanting to put a black box warning on the specific mRNA ones designed for cancer - why? Because in trials they were found to cause other cancers! Also, the danger is the LNPs, enveloping the mRNA. Italian chemist presentation on this. vimeo.com/807279310
I'm not convinced there is any "gene therapy" going on. I have suspicions that what's going on is fear-mongering, and the ingredients are pretty damn nasty, so avoidance is a good idea regardless. Look at it this way: Injections are unhealthy ANYWAY, and always have been. There is nothing NATURAL about injecting something into someone-- Our immune systems are beautiful and amazing without trying to outdo Nature with idiotic conjecture. There is nothing that cannot be cured naturally, IF one knows what to do.
All that said, when a syringe has lethal toxins in it, it doesn't matter whether it's "gene therapy" or not (I am doubting this entire premise of what we think is "genetics" anyway.) Graphene, Mercury, Aluminum, Formaldehyde... WTAF. Just don't let anyone poke a needle into you! There might be one or two exceptions, like if you're going to die from an allergic reaction sort of thing, but... arf.
Well, these ARE in fact, gene therapies and should be labeled, thought of and treated, as such. Now if anyone can explain why healthy populations were mandated to accept these injections, passed off as vaccines, I am listening. Otherwise, this was a big experiment to single out those dissenters and others who just wish for their blood to remain pure of modified synthetic human sludge - those smart enough to know transfection did not sound right at the outset, before shots were even rolled out and Fauci had to come on TV and lie that these were not gene altering injections, when that is exactly what they are, with some test subjects still expressing the spike and blindly accepting booster after booster with zero science to support repeated gene therapy injections are safe.
How do you KNOW this is "gene therapy," exactly? Curious.
A) I am educated
B) I know enough to review the SEC filings of both Moderna and Biontech. If you know a bit about SEC filings which public companies are required to make, it is illegal to lie in these filings.
Here is one such filing=>
https://investors.biontech.de/node/7381/html
Please use the link and then search the document for the phrase "gene therapy" and you will find statements like this:
" Although we expect to submit BLAs for our mRNA-based product candidates in the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products"
and
"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA."
Are you still curious? Moderna also has the exact same language in their 2019 and 2020 SEC filings. These companies and their FDA/CDC/NIH paid minions have convinced 66% of the planet these products are vaccines, when in fact they are quite the opposite.
If I may politely interject?
So, as noted by The Daily Beagle, the SEC filings do show mRNA should be classified as 'gene therapy' - according to American law (Securities Exchange Commission are, of course, an American agency).
However, if you were to ask me, I feel like even "gene therapy" is still an insufficient placeholder, a red herring, a soft-touch if you will. There's nothing therapeutic about these shots. They're entirely harmful. Poison.
So, the correct term I would use is 'genetic modification' (you will see I use that term through-out the article). It modifies DNA, and it does so in a harmful way. Moderna and BioNTech are fighting over where the Overton window of perception resides - trying to argue that these either 'modify genes therapeutically' or 'don't modify genes'.
I propose there's a third, far more accurate paradigm outside this Orwellian speech control: harmful genetic modification.
I suspect Word Herder's contention is similar to mine; that they're not therapeutic. I think we all agree they modify genes.
Thanks for a great answer. Please do understand that I am very well aware that ANY "vaccine" is toxic. That said, I am also well aware that the entire "virus" concept is fraudulent, or at best mistaken. What I'm curious about is how you know these supposed "truthy" filings are not simply bullshit and the SEC paid off, like the CDC, FDA, et al--- It's not you that I question, it's THEM. Cheers.
BioNTech & Moderna: We can't tell people what it actually is, because then they would know what it actually is.
It is a fact that in most territories the regulatory approval framework for gene therapy products is more stringent than for vaccines, holding this class of product to much higher standards of safety than for vaccines.
Though clearly genetic therapies’ (according to submissions made to the US Securities Exchange Commission), Pfizer, Moderna et al. were able to get their Covid vaccines approved under the vaccine umbrella, probably because of political demands of the pandemic ‘emergency’.
It’s clear that Pharma knows they will be unlikely to pull the same trick twice, which is why they have adopted the alternative tactic of wooing regulators to basically reduce safety standards for mRNA based therapeutic products by no longer calling them ‘genetic therapy’.
In an uncertain world this is very concerning.
Perhaps Regulators should be encouraged to review not only the short and long term damage caused by recent so called mRNA vaccines, but also review admitted historical technical failures in bringing the technology to market and whether these have been adequately dealt with, BEFORE lowering standards.
Inside Pharma stack has an article on the FDA wanting to put a black box warning on the specific mRNA ones designed for cancer - why? Because in trials they were found to cause other cancers! Also, the danger is the LNPs, enveloping the mRNA. Italian chemist presentation on this. vimeo.com/807279310
I'm not convinced there is any "gene therapy" going on. I have suspicions that what's going on is fear-mongering, and the ingredients are pretty damn nasty, so avoidance is a good idea regardless. Look at it this way: Injections are unhealthy ANYWAY, and always have been. There is nothing NATURAL about injecting something into someone-- Our immune systems are beautiful and amazing without trying to outdo Nature with idiotic conjecture. There is nothing that cannot be cured naturally, IF one knows what to do.
All that said, when a syringe has lethal toxins in it, it doesn't matter whether it's "gene therapy" or not (I am doubting this entire premise of what we think is "genetics" anyway.) Graphene, Mercury, Aluminum, Formaldehyde... WTAF. Just don't let anyone poke a needle into you! There might be one or two exceptions, like if you're going to die from an allergic reaction sort of thing, but... arf.