Discover more from The Daily Beagle
Pfizer Blinded Clinical Study Was Rigged
C4591001 your number is up!
Correction: This article made reference to ‘randomised’, but meant ‘observer-blind’, and for this we apologise! Article has been corrected.
Currently The Daily Beagle is sifting through a large quantity of Pfizer FOIA documents to find damning evidence of criminality.
In looking through, we found a document that described the design of one of Pfizer’s “blinded” clinical studies (study C4591001) and how they collected data from study participants, in a document called ‘125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-fa-interim-sample-crf.pdf’, found in the FOIA batch ‘pd-production-040122’.
In this document, we found evidence that the study was highly rigged to ensure evidence of adverse reactions was not found, in order to give the false impression the shots were safe.
Rigged Custom Software
Participants were required to install customised smartphone software called “TrialMax App”, seemingly made by “Signant Health”:
This app is used in the trial C4591001, in order to gather data from participants, and contains a feature known as “vaccination diary”.
This ‘diary’ is just a system of very limited questions tracking a very select few adverse events. Only pre-approved, Pfizer accepted adverse events.
No Free-Form Text Boxes
People who took the vaccine and were injured, were not able to report adverse events freely. Instead, the smartphone app heavily restricted what information they could submit to the trial, rigging the outcome data.
On pages 124 to 136, evidence is shown users could only submit data for largely non-fatal sounding adverse events, such as:
And they could only submit an emergency room visit or hospitalisation for only the following events:
Pain at the injection site
Events which most people would agree are not classically severe and do not typically cause hospitalisations, essentially guaranteeing Pfizer could maliciously and misleadingly report an artificially low hospitalisation rate for their shots.
There was no free text field where patients could freely raise issues, no comprehensive selection option for a wide variety of harms, such as blood clots, strokes, sudden death, heart attacks and more, nor was there any meaningful prompt nor query in the smartphone app asking for ‘anything else’ or ‘other’ which might have been relevant to the trial.
This Shows Safety Data From The Trials Are Invalid And Fraudulent
Given that it outright prevented patients from registering and logging vital data of health outcomes in relation to the shots, it means the trial C4591001 is invalid and therefore fraudulent. Pfizer describes the trial as:
A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
But it isn’t possible for this trial to evaluate “safety” or “tolerability” given it does not permit the free and unfettered submission of adverse outcome data. It also cannot be accurately be described as “observer-blind” because it artificially crimps what data is collected — researchers are projecting their own adverse events bias onto the data collection form.
Therefore it could not accurately reflect real world, broader conditions, and any inferences based on this dataset are entirely invalid. The study needs to be pulled.
Subscribe for free to The Daily Beagle.
Learned something new? Share so others may learn.
Leave a comment below: