Moderna Release Their Cancer Shot
Cause problem, sell solution
Now that the forcefully mandated mRNA shots have caused cancer with the WHO admitting cancer cases are set to soar by 77% (as predicted by The Daily Beagle)…
…something Moderna clearly expected to happen, the propaganda media are now awash with gushing reviews of a so-called “cancer vaccine”:
No prizes for guessing it uses mRNA, same dodgy technology that causes cancer in the first place, and it comes complete with the usual corrupt suspects…
…Imperial College London of ‘Viki’ Male vaccine shill fame…
...‘mRNA-4359’…
…and separately, Pfizer’s BioNTech.
BioNTech joining probably has something to do with Pfizer planning on gouging all those cancer victims they’ve created for massive profits (enough profit they spent $43 billion, no doubt anticipating to recoup costs, they’re that confident in the spike in cancer)…
As The Daily Beagle previously reported in “Murderous Moderna’s Infiltration Of Politics”, all the pharmaceutical companies were literally getting in bed with each other over the prospects of making crazy profits.
Not So Strange Bedfellows
…AstraZeneca (shareholder of Moderna)…
…Pfizer (Flagship Pioneering co-founded and currently invest in Moderna)…
…oh and Prime Minister of the UK government, Rishi Sunak (who co-founded firm Thélème Partners LLP currently invested in Moderna)…
…and the World Economic Forum (Stephane Bancel, founding CEO of Moderna).
So many in bed! Readers are encouraged to read “Murderous Moderna’s Infiltration Of Politics” to see how deep the corruption goes.
Cause Problem, Sell Solution: Same Old, Same Old
Vaccine manufacturers causing the very problems they sell the ‘solutions’ to, is nothing new. We wrote the unpopular article that vaccine manufacturers are behind the outbreaks, citing numerous case examples of vaccine research labs leaking viruses (some, several times).
Over a year ago, The Daily Beagle called out such actions where one intentionally causes a problem to sell a solution. We dubbed it a Bastiat crime, based on French economist Frédéric Bastiat’s highlighting the broken window fallacy.
Would it be as surprising they would sell a shot that causes cancer, then claim to sell a solution to the problem they caused? Our publicly free hypothetical treatment modalities article for fast spreading cancer was equally as unpopular (guess we get a lot of vaccine manufacturers as readers?).
FAC Off
We found FAC [Ferric Ammonium Citrate; A.K.A. Ammonium Ferric Citrate] (not to be confused with ‘Ferric Citrate’) destroyed certain types of cancers…
[…] this study verifies that AFC [Ammonium Ferric Citrate] has the biological activity of activating oxidative stress injury in NSCLC [non-small-cell lung carcinoma] cell lines, leading to a decrease in their autophagy and inducing ferroptosis.
…impeded the migration (spread) of certain types of cancers…
[…] we show that increasing cellular iron content results in decreased migratory capacity of human glioblastoma cells. The decrease in migratory capacity was accompanied by a decrease in cellular polarization in the direction of movement.
— Iron inhibits glioblastoma cell migration and polarization
…impeded dreaded transfection…
[…] FAC was observed to interfere with DNA transfection acting at early stages in all transfection agents and all cell lines studied […]
…and impeded certain types of viruses.
Here we found the iron salt ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) inhibited Influenza A virus, HIV virus, Zika virus, and Enterovirus 71 (EV71) infections. […]
[...] both iron ion and citrate ion were required for the antiviral capability of FAC, as other iron salts and citrates did not exhibit viral inhibition. […]
[…] Mechanistically, FAC inhibited viral infection through inducing viral fusion and blocking endosomal viral release. […]
FAC probably does other things as well, however it was outside the scope of our original investigation.
FAC is used as a food additive, however it does not presently appear to be sold in any sort of supplement form (and is often confused with Ferric Citrate by search engines, which is not the same thing).
Is it really surprising the sellers of the cancer causing shots who laid the groundwork for cancer shots years ago, are now trying to peddle you yet more expensive wares for a cancer cure?
Stay savvy, dear reader.
Related Articles To Read
Other Articles To Read
Found this informative?
Help inform?
Thoughts, dear reader?
- If there can be a cancer vaccine, then cancer is not what the Science(tm) tells us (a genetic disease).
- The other option is that their "vaccine" is not a vaccine, but another gene editing injection.
IRL cancer is a metabolic disease (w/ a genetic component), which can be prevented/managed with not giving the cancer the energy it requires to grow, by starving it. See the open access papers & interviews from Professor Thomas Seyfried who has spent his life studying cancers in lab. He says the current cancer research has been going nowhere b/c their theory is wrong, as its not mainly a genetic dis-ease.
Kudos for this post, Beagle. Same old cat shit, seems we'd be alert for it by now... and we are. I'd venture to say (woof!) that this is not just problem/solution, but also two other thinks: the Nasties are getting scared that we'll catch on and end their income for vaxxxxxing us to debth, and also: EMF's can CAUSE CANCER.
That third thing is the hefalump in the room. It's a YOOOGE hefalump, too.