Where Did The Cancer Cases Go?

Daily Beagle Uncovers 110k Increase As Traitorous Cancer Orgs Hide Data

As Dr Clare Craig remarks:

Looking for comparison datasets on American Cancer Society, one can’t help but notice the avoidance of 2020 data, and the total absence of 2021 and 2022:

Strange. The UK is slightly better at keeping statistics, what do their websites say?

Cancer Research UK has a noticable lack of cancer research for the years 2020-2023, and seems to stick strictly to 2019 as their upper limit:

Strange how a cancer charity org that begs for donations to do cancer research, doesn’t have up-to-date cancer research. Why can’t they keep up-to-date records? What do they get paid for, if not to research cancer?

NHS Digital (now just ‘NHS England’) has the most recent stats cancer death stats “updated” as of March 2023, but don’t be fooled dear reader…

…they only talk about 2020, despite being originally published in 2022:

What happened to 2021? Where’s the 2022 dataset now we’re in 2023?

People still died from cancer in 2021, 2022 and 2023, so where did all that data go?

Into a sinkhole to avoid inconveniencing people with the truth.

Picking Up The Trail

After the indirect tip-off by Dr Clare correcting a TikToker’s erroneous assertions on Twitter regarding cancer case estimates, The Daily Beagle managed to find American Cancer Society’s very well hidden estimates to double-check the numbers, split over four PDFs; these include the data for 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022.

As Jikkyleaks warns, however, American Cancer Society subtly adjusted the figures in 2022 to try to obscure the signal by moving the goalpost from ‘under 45’ to ‘under 50’:

Adding the extra 5 years allows them to introduce FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) in the dataset, discouraging a direct comparison so you can’t pin the sharp uptick of cancers on the poison shots in the young.

Younger people are supposed to be less suspect to cancer, so naturally tossing in a few older people will obscure the harms signal; I doubt the doubling is purely because of an extra 5 years alone, as you’ll see below.

Partially Restoring The Picture

Despite their attempts to obfuscate, we can still extract some comparisons between the datasets proving that something happened starting in 2021; we can still compare the all ages group between 2019 to 2022.

We took the effort to manually extract the data out into an .ODS spreadsheet, grouped by age and organised by timeline, making it much easier to see the alarming trends. You can download the spreadsheet here, for free (we’ve omitted the non-matching groups with N/As).

What Do The Estimates Show Us?

All Ages

The most striking aspects about this is for males, in all sites of cancer, estimates jumped up by 112,190 cases between 2019 to 2022, with a whopping 76,590 case increase between 2020 and 2021 alone.

For females, the jump is big, but not as big as males; an increase of 43,390 cases (38.6% the number of males) between 2019-2022; and an increase of 14,980 cases between 2020-2021 (19.5% the number of males).

Prostate cancer has the next noticable increase, jumping by 93,840 cases between 2019-2022, and jumping by a whopping 56k cases alone between 2020 and 2021.

There is a distinct impression that whilst cancers are up for everybody, it appears to disportionately and adversely affect men.

Speculating On What They’re Trying To Hide

The below is not valid data, as it “erroneously” assumes the under 50s data and under 45s data are interchangeable (they’re “not”); but the purpose here is to demonstrate what the American Cancer Society appear to be trying to hide.

As you can see, nearly every field has had a doubling in cancer cases, with the exception of prostate (which has more than tripled), and all sites which has increased by roughly half for both male and female.

The under 45 age range is not where you’d normally see a sharp increase in cancers, given younger people are less suspect to it. Prostate is a clear example: a “mere” 900 in 2019, compared to a whopping 3010 in 2022. It should not be that high.

Assuming the slight shift to under 50s is to hide this massive signal of a sudden 2022 cancer jump in the young, it is evident the shots have caused this sudden jump, because unlike the other data there’s no 2020-2021 jump.

LNPs Reach The Prostate

One compelling connection for this is the fact LNPs [lipid nanoparticles; found in mRNA shots] biodistribute to the prostate gland, as noted in Judicial Watch’s “JW v HHS FDA Pfizer BioNTech Vaccine” PDF, noting it specifically impacts males:

It would therefore not be surprising if these LNPs cause cancer in the prostate, adversely impacting males, and that the American Cancer Society, covering up for their pharmaceutical sponsors, are trying to hide the damage

Sponsors include Janssen (makers of the Johnson&Johnson GM adenovirus shot), AstraZeneca (GM adenovirus shot again, which we’ve proven kills children), Novaritis (attempted manufacturers of mRNA shot Novavax), and surprise, Pfizer, makers of mRNA child murder shot.

There’s also the Bill Gates sponsored “Beyond Meat” to take note of. A nice proxy shell company exerting influence, no doubt, on his behalf (why would they need to sponsor a ‘cancer charity’, unless their lab grown meat has some serious issues…):

Bill Gates, via the Gates Foundation, heavily finances ‘vaccines’ and other poison shots:

This includes, more explicitly, the AstraZeneca shot…

…where so-called “altruist” Bill Gates encouraged Oxford University to turn a profit by signing an exclusive licencing agreement:

Why does this matter?

As The Daily Beagle have previously evidenced, the specific GM viruses used in AstraZeneca, Sputnik V and Johnson&Johnson are known to cause cancer.

So naturally, the pharmauceutical companies have exerted their financial influence to silence American Cancer Society (and no doubt other cancer “charity” orgs who are more concerned with money than lives) and getting them to suppress evidence of serious harms by the poison shots.

These so-called “charity” organisations ought to be exposed as the propaganda laundering outlets that they are.

Charity cover-up sponsored by Pfizer.

---

Substack is censored on social media. Beat the censorship and get direct notifications for free:

Raise awareness?

And have a friendly chat (angry Pfizer shill sock accounts not welcome):