Health Canada Admits Plasmids In mRNA Shots Are Real

They don't care

Per our previous article asking readers to help us defeat censorship, readers voted to read about the government admitting to plasmids:

Proving health regulators are trying to kill you, Health Canada admitted to The Epoch Times that they were already aware of plasmids in the mRNA shots. They just don’t care.

They just want you dead to such a level they won’t even tell you publicly before hand that it is genetic technology, even though by US FDA’s own classification standards, anything containing plasmid DNA is a ‘gene therapy’ product:

As previously noted on The Daily Beagle, Moderna and BioNTech (manufacturer for Pfizer) both registered their products as ‘gene therapy’ to SEC whilst fraudulently claiming they were ‘vaccines’ to the public:

The FDA also have a document that declares adenovirus vectors also count as ‘gene therapy’:

AstraZeneca (and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) shots, which cause thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (clotting and a loss of platelets) and kill children, are genetically modified adenovirus shots, and would therefore also count as ‘gene therapy’.

Their slide also mentions “adeno-associated virus” as ‘gene therapy’ (we will always call them gene modification because there’s nothing therapeutic about it):

Longer readers of The Daily Beagle might vaguely recall either “AAV” or “adeno-associated virus”. We covered it in an article reporting the successful test of sterilising animals with ‘gene therapy’, where the EMA called the adeno-associated virus ‘gene therapy’:

‘Permanent contraception’ is an odd way to spell sterilisation. Too many negative connotations with authoritarian medical regimes.

In the FDA slideshow, seemingly written before the FDA turned fully corrupt, it expresses finding “surprises” in a “few” ‘gene therapy’ tests, including salmon DNA:

FDA clearly hasn’t done full sequencing of the mRNA shots, per requirements for genotoxicity studies in genetic modification. Remember, Pfizer withdrew their application from India when India asked for local trials not subject to Pfizer’s manipulation:

India would not grant it excluded-from-liability emergency use authorisation, because Pfizer refused to perform a small trial:

How bad must the shot be if Pfizer flee in terror from a small local trial? How corrupt and insufficient must the FDA be if Pfizer didn’t run from them?

India also declined to buy Moderna’s shots as well:

Won’t buy? Or Pfizer and Moderna won’t comply? Remember, India is a country rife with government corruption, and yet their regulator had a higher standard than the FDA, Health Canada, MHRA and EMA combined. A ‘small local trial’.

Genetic modification (‘gene therapy’) must undergo a different standard. For example, in the UK, the NHS ‘requires’ it be registered with the Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (GTAC) for ethics approval in clinical trials.

Pfizer and Moderna obviously did not do this. In the US, the deliberately corrupt and non-transparent FDA only makes mention to “cancer gene therapy”, and not genetic modification in general. It must be evaluated by “the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies (OCTGT)”:

Even as we speak, the corrupt FDA is looking to lower the standards on genetic modification even further, with Peter Marks, head of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, moaning it takes too long and costs too much to test all these products properly:

Your health and safety doesn’t matter to these mass murderers. Mass manufacture product, consume next product, disregard the consequences, all for profits, because the head of a department thinks testing — their one job — is too much hard work.

Of course, the vaccine cult are so hell bent on murdering people who don’t conform they’ll even kill old women by denying them transplants, and then victim blame them for not conforming with the murder cult [Update: Angus has since deleted it, we’ve switched to an archived copy]:

So soulless and evil one has to be to dehumanise a person like that.

They know what they said is so blatantly evil that they prohibit anyone from replying lest they receive backlash:

Whether it is by mRNA shots, gene modification, denial of healthcare access, arson, trapping you in fires or turning off lifesaving waters, these governments are trying to kill you. Will you act?

Summary

HealthCanada admit they always knew about plasmids in the mRNA shot; and don't care, withholding the information from the public. Moderna and BioNTech (Pfizer's manufacturer) quietly admitted they were 'gene therapy' in SEC filings but fraudulently labelled the shots 'vaccines' to the public without disclosing the genetic modification aspects.

FDA admit plasmids count as 'gene therapy', and also count adeno-associated viruses (AAV), and genetically modified adenoviruses as 'gene therapy'. AAVs have permanent effects. Previously The Daily Beagle reported on a sterilisation of animals based on AAVs.

The AstraZeneca and Janssen shots use genetically modified adenoviruses, and should be classified as 'gene therapy'; but fraudulently aren't.

'Gene therapy' requires a higher testing standard; Pfizer couldn't even meet India's extremely low testing threshold for non-genetic products and fled. India refused to purchase Moderna as well.

Genotoxicity studies ought to be performed. Given Pfizer did not comply with India's low threshold, it is unlikely they performed any such testing in the US, Canada, EU or UK. Peter Marks, head of CBER, bemoaned the hard work of actually testing 'gene therapy' and wanted an easier way to cash in. The FDA have no publicly stated standards for 'gene therapy' besides the ones for cancer.

Vaccine cultists will happily kill people who don't conform by maliciously withholding services, then blaming the victims that they kill via their abusive, violent and controlling tactics.

Governments are obviously killing their own citizens. Will the public act?

What do you think, dear reader?

---

Poll

---

Found this informative? Receive more for free!

Raise awareness?

Come join us on Element!

What do you think, dear reader?