EMA Leaks: "Acceptability Criteria Is Confidential"

Confidentiality trumps your life as major RNA integrity percentage cover-up withholds informed consent for criminal medical experimentation.

If you haven’t already, read EMA Leaks: Truncated Transcripts first, as it introduces an easy-to-access understanding of the concepts we will be continuing here, and are the foundation for these explanations.

Documents Reveal Absurdly Low Integrity Percentages

In the document ‘20201126_BNT162b2_EMAmeeting_final.pptx’, slide 9, there is a listed ‘Major Objection’ on the extremely low percentages of RNA integrity in mRNA in specific SARS-CoV-2 shot batches:

The table in the Major Objection reveals that RNA integrity for ‘Drug Product’ falls as low as 55% — barely enough integrity to remain remotely stable — and as high as 69%. The RNA integrity for the ‘Drug Product’ averages an extremely poor 62%.

‘Drug Product’ here most likely refers to the entire product itself (I.E. the shot), drug substance refers to an ingredient in the product. This is most likely to be either the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that bind to or hold the mRNA, or the mRNA itself.

EMA Were Aware Of The Instability Issues And Withheld From The Public

Under the EMA Quality Office CMC observations document, titled “BNT CMC Peer Reviewer Comparability.pptx”, slide 4, we see a list of batch analysis for the percentages of RNA integrity:

It shows the RNA integrity percentages were higher in clinical batches compared to commercial (I.E. what the public received was an inferior product to what was tested), and shows the EMA were acutely aware of the problem.

VW Emissions Scandal Analogy

The best analogy here is the VW emissions scandal, where the car, when tested, performs better on emission tests, but in the real world, behaves far worse. This also follows the emissions scandal in the sense the company did not disclose this difference publicly.

Where the analogy differs is the testers and regulators were in on the scam and proactively covered it up.

This shows the EMA not only knew of the RNA integrity issues, but failed to disclose to the public, guaranteeing criminal violations of Informed Consent and criminal medical experimentation, by failing to inform victims of the true nature of the shots, and essential subjecting them to medical abuse and experimentation as guinea pigs, the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment in a nutshell.

Major Cover Up In A Circle Of Silence

By withholding publication of this information from clinical trials, Pfizer have also engaged in massive clinical fraud, as this is a significant variable that impacts clinical outcomes.

Even when pressed by the BMJ and caught red-handed regulators and vaccine manufacturers still refused to disclose and continue their criminal cover-up even now :

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, the UK’s medicines regulator, acknowledged the lack of a specified percentage RNA integrity, but declined to provide further detail.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directed The BMJ to read its guidance documents and its review of Pfizer’s vaccine, but none of these specify the percentage RNA the agency is requiring. Asked to comment, the regulator pointed to Pfizer: “information that you seek that is not addressed in the FDA Review Memorandum should be directed to Pfizer.”

FDA, EMA, and Canadian government department Health Canada all stated that specific information related to the acceptability criteria is confidential.

Health Canada has confirmed to The BMJ that regulators “have worked together to align those requirements,” but all agencies declined to share with The BMJ any specifics on grounds that such information was commercially sensitive.

Pfizer also declined to comment on what percentage mRNA integrity it is aiming for, nor would it address questions about the cause of the unexpectedly low percentage mRNA integrity in certain batches […]

Moderna’s chief corporate affairs officer Ray Jordan declined to respond to any of The BMJ’s questions […]

CureVac, whose mRNA vaccine was submitted for EMA’s “rolling review” in February, told The BMJ that “it is too soon to give details.”

This alone should tell you something is extremely criminal if no-one will talk about it. ‘Commercial confidentiality’ trumps your life, you should be outraged about this.

EMA And Pfizer Had No Idea The Impacts (And Sold The Shots Anyway)

The mRNA integrity issues had not undergone any clinical trials to determine impacts or issues that would result. In the leaked emails, under the file titled “07.PNG”, part of the email remarks that they:

[…] don’t know whether there is a test that would allow to predict impact on efficacy without clinical trial for comparability […]

Why were the public not informed of this untested monstrosity in their shots? And will this be held to account for violations of criminal medical experimentation?

---

Subscribe to The Daily Beagle to get more content like this:

Think others could learn something new?

Or leave a comment below: