Genetic Modification Proof As Strand Of Truth Emerges
Pfizer Shills Shoot Shot In Foot With Omission Admission
Previously we’ve had an ‘Infodemic Manager’ who accidentally proved a Europe-wide excess deaths increase post-shot in children, and a Moderna shill whom inadvertently proven more vaccinated died than unvaccinated, but these shills brought to you by Pfizer bring proof of gene tampering.
For those unfamiliar, both Pfizer and Moderna manufactured mRNA shots for SARS-CoV-2.
The Daily Beagle published evidence of how Moderna had registered in their SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] filings that mRNA are considered by the FDA to be ‘gene therapy’. These documents are legally required to be accurate.
One Pfizer shill angrily insisted a legal document ‘didn’t prove anything’ (even though legally it is required to be accurate; inaccurate filings are fraud), but was then forced to admit the FDA states ‘gene therapy’ is anything that ‘modifies a person’s gene’:
They then went on to falsely and incorrectly claim there was ‘no evidence of DNA contamination’ (in a now deleted Tweet):
Unfortunately for them, not all the Pfizer shills were on the same page, and some knew better than to tell such an obvious lie, such as Taylor Ray:
Taylor Ray, a self-described bioengineer, had felt like talking down to The Daily Beagle over contamination in the Pfizer shots, and insisted that “plasmid contamination has been known about literally the entire time”, which is an odd rebuttal because it’s like saying a massacre is okay because people knew about it.
The ‘already knew about it’ part might be surprising to anyone who received the shots and were not notified of this contamination issue:
They went on to berate The Daily Beagle (thinking they had some sort of upper hand), and went on to quote what they claimed were EMA documents confirming the plasmid contamination:
Thanks for proving they’re contaminated with plasmids for us!
The images extracted:
Their pedantry was trying to argue it was below some arbitrary and unjustified acceptability criterion the EMA had invented (unproven, untested, of course, given no prior history of mRNA shot approvals), but that’s a red herring. Confirming the plasmids existed in the first place is all that’s needed.
This is where the gotcha comes in — remember, you’re hearing this from the horse’s mouth of the Pfizer shills themselves — the FDA link the other shill provided counts plasmids as a means of ‘gene therapy’:
Also notice the year in the date? 2018. Same year as the Moderna SEC filing, barely four months after the FDA page:
In Moderna’s 2020 filing, mRNA was still considered ‘gene therapy’:
…which as the Pfizer shill admits the FDA classifies, is anything that modifies genes. That, and there’s also the fact the Daily Beagle previously noted that LNPs [lipid nanoparticles] used in the shots interact with plasmids and suppress genes:
And before you go ‘but that’s Moderna’s filing, not Pfizer’:
Moderna tried to sue Pfizer for patent infringement over the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 shot, meaning they consider the designs to be so similar as to warrant a legal intervention (that costs a lot of money), and;
BioNTech, the manufacturer who works on behalf of Pfizer also filed a SEC report, which also admits that, yes, it’s a ‘gene therapy’:
Well, there’s a slam dunk if you ever saw one.
Plasmid contamination in the mRNA shots altering your DNA, brought to you by Pfizer.
The question now becomes: what alterations are they trying to do to your body?
Substack is censored on social media. Beat the censorship and get direct notifications for free:
Raise awareness?
Or have a friendly discussion (nerdy Californian sounding IP loggers not welcome):
Lets see if the Pfizer shills who are trying to post unevidenced propaganda via sock accounts will cough up the stump fee if I change the comment section settings to 'paid'.
The "Charles Beaudry" sock was quite amusing because all their bio says is that they are a "Geologists". So good at geology there's more than one of them, amazing.
Well, that's the big question isn't it? Are they engineering something you might want to keep out of your DNA? Are they engineering in something they want like tractability, less IQ, infertility, more cancer prone? I mean anything that would make you more dependent on THEM? Or something to 'time' your life span, just like a Replicant in Blade Runner? Yeah. Kind of think they are. And the nano tech. What will happen in an huge EMP situation? A mass coronal ejection? Would that burn the tech out, kill the body of the person who has alot of it in them? I have a thousand questions, thought.. no answers though.