Scotland Conspires To Deny Unvaccinated Fertility Treatments
Mass discrimination eugenics against unvaccinated as social media suppress
Credit to biologyphen0m for the lead.
There’s plenty of swathes of evidence for discrimination of the unvaccinated within media propaganda, even to the point of killing the unvaccinated maliciously by denial of care and then victim blaming…
…have you ever seen official documentation of the healthcare industry conspiring with the government in order to intentionally reduce the population numbers of the unvaccinated? Well, if Twitter had their way, you wouldn’t be hearing about it right now.
Twitter Desperately Tries To Suppress
…even though the original post is entirely visible.
Why would Twitter try to put the kibosh on this?
We know Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino is a known pro-vaccine shill who coordinates with the US government financed Ad Council and makes no bones about being pro-censorship (essentially, yet another government financed illegal censorship proxy).
Elon Musk is cool with this on account of being a pro-mRNA, pro-CureVac and pro-Moderna shill whose company, Tesla, supplied mRNA micro-factories to CureVac, and thus is painfully aware that the mRNA shots contain DNA (read: he knows the shots cause harms and he’s complicit). Note his deafening silence.
Censorship of this calibre isn’t going to stop The Daily Beagle from raising awareness of this story.
Officially hosted on the Scottish government’s website, in response to a Freedom of Information act request, is a document from the Assisted Conception Units Leads group (ACU) talking about receiving notice from “John Burns, Chief Operating Officer in Scottish Government”:
Note: document appears to be incorrectly dated at the top, marked as both 2021 and 2022…
…however, 2021 is clearly a typo, as further in it says ‘14 December 2022’…
Who Is John Burns?
Who is this, you might be wondering?
John Burns joined NHS Scotland in July 2021 as Chief Operating Officer, after standing down from Chief Executive at NHS Ayrshire and Arran. Curiously NHS Ayrshire and Arran was in £20 million debt and John Burns claimed he needed 3 years — from 2018, three years before he left — to balance the books.
He’s reportedly been chief executive for various NHS organisations for 20 years, and has been in the NHS for 39, including being involved in ‘national programmes’ that involve ‘waiting times’, which you’ll soon see to either be sadistic or ironic:
He has a BA Honours Business Studies from the Dundee College of Technology (A.K.A. University of Abertay), Diploma in Health Service management, and an MBA (Master of Business Administration), as mentioned in his video.
Additionally, he also claims to be a co-chair for ‘Climate Change and Sustainability’. Notice however, he does not have any medical qualifications, and should not be making medical decisions on behalf of all patients.
Attempting to archive his history gets stonewalled by Archive.org, in a curious mirror to Twitter’s own suppression:
As you may or may not know, climate crazies insist on reducing the population to ‘fight climate change’, so it is a wonder if this influences his decision making.
John Burns has also previously appeared in an article which bragged how NHS Scotland worked with Defence (read: military) forces and how the two sides ‘benefit’ from each other.
Why is this a curiousity? It is an open secret that the UK military’s 77th Brigade are rabidly pro-vaccine, even to the point of falsely claiming any criticism of the shots come from ‘hostile states’.
They regularly monitor social media posts, and it wouldn’t be surprising if the UK military, in bed with NHS Scotland, were getting the story about NHS Scotland’s schemes on Twitter suppressed.
Scotland Healthcare Professionals Maliciously Conspired To Deny Fertility Treatments To The Unvaccinated
It isn’t clear where John Burns got the bizarre notion to discriminate and deny the unvaccinated access to fertility services. He appears to have worked lifelong in the NHS, and The Daily Beagle could not find evidence of the usual financial conflicts of interest. It could be someone else told him to put that notice out.
The document discussing the notice in question immediately goes for the jugular, admitting multiple clinical leads (healthcare professionals) outright stated they should deny (‘defer’) treatment to unvaccinated people. Notice it also includes ‘not fully vaccinated’ people, an arbitrary, goal-post moving standard:
“Temporarily” deferred for how long? It doesn’t say. There’s no discussion on any other approaches, just venom aimed at the unvaccinated.
The leads who conspired this, include people who came from across Scotland, including ones from Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Dundee and Glasgow, and members of the Scottish Government, NHS Ayrshire and Arran, NHS Lanarkshire, NHS NSS (National Services Scotland) and Fertility Network:
They go on to claim — without presenting or citing any actual evidence — that there’s “increased levels of morbidity and risk of severe illness amongst unvaccinated pregnant women” from “Delta” whilst speculating baselessly about the uncertainty around “Omicron”.
To show how fraudulent and malicious their decision making is, prior immunity acquired from the virus itself isn’t even considered, despite the fact it is clearly associated with protection. Nor is the fact considered that children’s risk to SARS-CoV-2 is practically non-existent (peer-review paper) .
Evidence readily available, long before this scheme was hatched, even showed the fetus was particularly resilient (their words) against SARS-CoV-2:
That is to say, the real world evidence contradicts their unevidenced statements used to maliciously deny the unvaccinated access to fertility care. And that is without the fact the harms of the shots in the form of mRNA instability issues, myocarditis issues, and vaccine induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis were already known issues at the time.
Without consulting any third parties, engaging in a commentary period, doing any basic, fundamental research, or considering any other variables (such as time sensitivity in treatment), the lead clinicians conspired to have this diktat enforced immediately:
Their evil scheme involved delaying treatment by arbitrarily and maliciously just adding additional time to wait lists (coyly couched in the terminology of ‘treatment journey’, which is the clinical treatment pathway a patient takes):
They then schemed to rope in other members of other healthcare organisations they clearly hadn’t consulted in an attempt to get them to agree with the recommendation:
Was there any dissent?
Listed as attending include: NHS National Services Scotland, NHS Tayside, Edinburgh University (whom we've previously exposed for publishing fraudulent, misleading paper on vaccines relating to pregnancy and having massive financial conflicts of interest), NHS Grampian, Fertility Scotland, Fertility Network UK, Scottish Government, Public Health Scotland, NHS Lothian, University of Glasgow, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service.
Absent are: Progress Educational Trust.
This document hints there was a letter given out in January 7th (most likely 2022) recommending the discrimination against unvaccinated patients on the basis of unevidenced “clinical concerns”, showing this scheming has been months in the pipework:
The document tried to justify this discrimination by suggesting it was temporary, claiming they would ‘consider evidence’, however the document cites none:
They then go on to lie through their teeth claiming unvaccinated pregnant women are at risk whilst simultaneously admitting that data is “very limited” (read: does not exist to back up their malicious false claims):
The paper presented two bias options; either shove the vaccines down the throats of the unvaccinated by continuously bombarding them with propaganda and not maliciously delaying treatment, or maliciously delay treatment (with no explanation):
Notice it says ‘withdraw’ or ‘further’, meaning the malicious discrimination is already in effect by this point. Notice there is no option to allow people the freedom of choice; it is either to maliciously deny treatment, or bombard relentlessly with propaganda.
One made a limp-wristed ‘dissent’ by asking for the evidence for option one of the either-or fallacy:
Option one being the withdrawal of the malicious treatment delay. Fertility Network UK also supported option one when given the choice:
Fertility Network UK even pointed out how initial UK government advice had been to advise pregnant women not to get the shots, so they were tripping over their own shoelaces:
The group in February 2022 concluded against withdrawal of treatment:
The fact the malicious denial of treatment to coerce uptake of the shots was already in-effect and they were voting to reverse it, is absolutely mindblowing, even in light of all evidence and suggestions to the contrary.
The aforementioned records from December 2022 seems to show the Scottish government ignored the recommendation to withdraw their malicious scheme, and ploughed ahead anyway.
Ironically, John Burns signed a letter in 5th October 2021 about how he’d expand NHS services, all the while going on to deny them to unvaccinated people.
How does that make you feel, dear reader?
Related Articles To Read
Found this informative? Bypass censorship and receive more for free!
Help improve The Daily Beagle’s reach?
What do you think, dear reader? Let us know in the comments.