The Boosting Was Pre-Planned

You Cannot Trust Elon Musk Or CureVac

In a paper titled Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines, it remarked (emphasis added)…

Single intramuscular vaccination of NHPs with LNP-formulated mRNAs encoding rabies or influenza antigens induced protective antibody titers, which could be boosted and remained stable during an observation period of up to 1 year.

It went on to remark…

[…] These data suggest that the vaccination schedule with two injections of the LNP-formulated mRNA vaccine is sufficient to induce protection against rabies infections.

You could be forgiven if you thought this was a recent paper. The date of publication?

19th October 2017, years before the supposed outbreak.

Key Organisations

And the two key organisations of the paper talking about LNPs, mRNA and boosting?

None other than CureVac in Germany, and Acuitas Therapeutics in Vancouver, British Columbia in Canada:

If those sound familiar, they should, The Daily Beagle has written about both before.

Brought Up To Speed

If you’re new to The Daily Beagle, or are reading this article without further context, a brief refresher and the relevant articles.

Elon Musk and CureVac

Elon Musk was previously exposed by The Daily Beagle as falsely pretending to be anti-vaccine, whilst financing and supplying equipment to CureVac, an mRNA shot manufacturer. Long story short, Elon has a financial conflict of interest in mRNA technology.

He doesn’t try to hide it either.

In March 13th 2023 he falsely claimed without evidence that mRNA has the potential to cure cancer:

It doesn’t: CureVac’s J.P. Morgan financed prostate cancer trials were a failure.

[…] CV9104 failed to meet the primary endpoint of improving overall survival. […]

Elon Mask would try to shill mRNA again a month later in April 12th 2023, receiving even fewer likes as he tried to defend the SARS-CoV-2 poison shots:

For a man who is used to receiving quarter of a million likes for posting a crude image, 15k is a mere puddle. The takeaway: Elon Musk’s pro-mRNA, implicitly pro-CureVac hottakes aren’t fooling the public and they’re not popular.

He also praised Moderna, just in-case you had any doubts on bad guy status.

Lets cover the other companies.

Acuitas Therapeutics And LNPs

The Daily Beagle also exposed how a Canadian government-funded University of British Columbia, housed Acuitas Therapeutics, who were responsible for the design and patents of the toxic LNPs (lipid nanoparticles) found in the shots. They own the patents on ALC-0159 and ALC-0315, their custom LNPs.

Unsurprisingly, the aforementioned “Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines” study from 2017 mentions the exact same LNP designs as the Pfizer shot:

[…] we used in our study unmodified, sequence-optimized mRNA formulated with an optimized LNP consisting of an ionizable amino lipid, phospholipid, cholesterol and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) containing lipid.

…Including the toxic PEG containing lipids.

Quinine And IL-6 Inhibitors

The same above study notes how the mRNA shots cause…

[…] pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-6 […]

Which astute eagle-eyed readers will recall were two cytokines worsened by SARS-CoV-2, and mediated by Quinine, which we covered in our ‘In Defence Of Quinine’ article; long story short, too many cytokines is bad, Quinine helps keep them regulated.

mRNA-LNP shots will naturally make that problem worse by triggering more inflammation, rather than less. Now everybody is up to speed, let us continue!

CureVac Are The Bad Guys

Elon Musk at CureVac

CureVac helped design the modern day mRNA shots, which is why you will hear deafening silence or pro-mRNA cheerleading from Elon Musk on the topic. To do so would be to admit he is culpable.

It is also why, at one point, Elon went bats—t crazy and censored every Substack article link, only to re-permit posting of links — albeit with heavily suppressed engagement — to try to quell the outrage, excusing it as a business decision.

You hear that? Your First Amendment takes a backseat to a man making profits (the classic ‘private company’ argument when even Elon Musk admits Twitter is de facto a “town square”). You still can’t post Brighteon videos on Twitter either. Like the EMA leaks video, for example. Try it, we dare you.

J.P Morgan (A.K.A. Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends) Involved

As for CureVac, the mRNA-LNP study in October 2017 mentioned the rabies shot:

[…] LNP-formulated mRNAs encoding rabies or influenza antigens […]

This same rabies shot was mentioned 9 months earlier at the J.P. Morgan healthcare conference:

CureVac’s first-in-human phase I clinical trial with an mRNA-based rabies vaccine was designed to evaluate CV7201 in healthy volunteers without pre-existing immunity against the rabies virus.

So, not only is billionaire Elon Musk financing the mRNA shots, but so was J.P. Morgan. Do you know who else gave CureVac financing? It shouldn’t be a surprise at this point.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Friend Bill Gates

CureVac partnered with the Gates Foundation back in 2015…

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and CureVac Collaborate to Accelerate the Development of Transformative Vaccine Technology

— March 5th 2015, Gates Foundation

…and would do so again in 2018:

CureVac snags new Gates Foundation backing for universal flu, malaria mRNA vaccine work

— February 13th 2018, Fierce Pharma

With so many billionaires financing CureVac — Elon Musk, Bill Gates, J.P. Morgan, deep suspicion has to be cast on this technology.

CureVac Temporarily Partner With Arcturus

This will probably feel ‘twilight zone’ for some readers.

Yes, that is the invented new name of the “variant” by the WHO:

Turns out, the pharmaceutical companies can’t help themselves in their giant self-referential circlejerk. Don’t forget that Pfizer was forced to basically admit to mutating SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

CureVac previously worked with an LNP company called Arcturus Therapeutics , back in January 2018:

What a mysterious coincidence! You can find their co-agreement on the SEC website here.

In February 2019, shortly before the supposed ‘outbreak’, this misleading article falsely claims that CureVac withdrew from their RNA collaboration with Arcturus:

But if you read the actual content, the body of the text contradicts where the Arcturus CEO and president Joseph Payne states that he looks forward to their continued collaboration:

In 2021, investment website Seeking Alpha stated CureVac’s setback with their dodgy SARS-CoV-2 shot (the same one Elon Musk backs) could reflect badly on Arcturus and Translate Bio (another company):

That is because Arcturus’s patented LNP tech, ARCT-021, used in the CureVac shot, did not work:

Interesting, then, we now have an ‘Arcturus’ ‘variant’ after Arcturus tech is used by a vaccine company, reinforcing The Daily Beagle’s point on vaccine manufacturers being behind outbreaks.

So overwhelming was The Daily Beagle’s evidence, the US Senate have recently admitted that the Chinese were engaging in vaccine research prior to the ‘outbreak’:

“MUDDY WATERS” “THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19 REPORT”, Page 48

As we know, the concept of ‘contagious vaccines’ has already been discussed and financed by the NIH. The Daily Mail reports that ‘transmissible vaccines’ are being tested on pigs involving Swine Flu:

In 11th April 2019, Peter Clark of the UK government’s Department of Health and Social Care wrote about modelling a “self spreading vaccine”, which wasn’t a paper, so much as a slideshow, where they spoke about constructing a “pandemic flu self spreading vaccine” and releasing it “into general population”:

The same slideshow had this embarrassing remark about a “mad science badge”, which shows how non-seriously they take releasing viruses into the general population:

So, could it be possible “Arcturus” is from… Arcturus? We leave it up to Daily Beagle readers to decide.

---

Subscribe to receive more content from The Daily Beagle.

Raise awareness!

Or leave a comment below?