Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Underdog's avatar

I've not heard back from the gentleman accusing me of grammatical errors (not that it should alter the underlying evidence and citations), however if you spot any typographical, grammatical or spelling errors, feel free to drop me a comment quoting which portion and the proposed correction.

That said, this article is only the *beginning* of the corruption out of Moderna I could cover. I tried to keep it strictly on target and there was a lot of implied academic corruption involving peer review and clinical trials.

It strikes me the peer-review problem is worse than what The Daily Beagle anticipated in Peer-Review Fraud Like Cardboard (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/peer-review-fraud-like-cardboard); it seems like academics both do clinical trial, and then 'review' each other's work of which they stand to profit from, essentially de facto 'marking their own work'.

The University of Texas cancer corruption is a major red flag!

Expand full comment
Markker's avatar

Regardless of your supposed grammatical errors, which I never noticed, your article is very informative. Inside Pharma Substack, Hedley Rees, writes about all the connections too, going back years.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts