How Many Animals Does It Take To Make A NeuraLink Funeral?

7? 15? 150?

The Underdog

Jan 30, 2024

1,500

Including sheep, pigs and monkeys:

The Guardian admits this banger: just keep killing them until we get the results we want:

They tried to spin it that the monkeys etc were okay, but they had to kill them for Science™ so they could investigate the organs. Convenient way to avoid showing the devices true fatality rate if you kill all the animals post-implantation.

Elon Musk lied, and said that zero died.

But NeuraLink admitted it had actually killed them:

Don’t worry though, they died for an important cause — proving a monkey could play pong. One monkey, note. And it only took two whole implants!

We’re guessing there’s an annual booster implant every 6 months.

Flagged Brags

The reason we’re mentioning this now is Elon Mask is bragging that a human has had their first brain implant (‘ooh, promising’; a safety word for ‘probably going to fail’), and for some reason, over 71 thousand people think this is a good idea.

We mourn that person’s loss.

This is inline with the WEF (World Economic Forum’s) publicly stated goals of “Brain Transparency” (read: zero privacy of thoughts), as previously mentioned in our article “Elon Musk Flips From Vaccine Refusenik To Four Shot Taking Shot Seller”.

We also warned readers a while back that Elon only wanted them for their arms and brains in “Elon Is Part Of The Vaccine Crowd”. Mmm, brains.

He gave his embarrassing product the name ‘Telepathy’. Privacy Invader was taken, we guess. Along with ‘Monkey Killer’.

Even as the gullible flocked in their thousands to upvote such a product, we suggested Brain Cancer would be a better brand name.

Mysteriously, our truth bearing post, not nearly as popular.

History Of Cancer With Microchips

Microchips are known to cause tumours and cancer in animals (the same studies were publicly mentioned by CNBC back in 2007):

One such study is bluntly called “Tumors in long-term rat studies associated with microchip animal identification devices”:

This is because the body will attack any foreign implants (so-called ‘biomaterials’) and form a fibrin layer over it in order to protect the body.

The fibrins then promote, essentially, a cancerous response.

If it sounds vaguely familiar, it’s caused by fibrinogen (a ‘hexameric plasma glycoprotein’), which promotes fibrins, and we mentioned it before.

Causes Blood Clots, Inflammatory Responses

Fibrinogens were mentioned a long time ago in our “Daily Beagle Sniffs Out Blood Clot Cause”. That’s right folks, it causes blood clots too.

Implants also trigger inflammatory responses.

This behaviour is not surprising. If a body received a bone fragment or a bullet wound, you would fully expect the body to surround the foreign material, either to prevent or reduce the damage it causes to other parts of the body by wrapping it in a protective layer, or to attempt to destroy or expel it.

The surrounding of the implant by fibrins is known as ‘fibrous encapsulation’ (may also be known as a ‘biofilm’) and it happens with every single implant:

The transhumanist crowd have been desperate to thwart the natural body response to the foreign, toxic materials:

This is why Elon ‘Mask’ isn’t being the first volunteer for his cancer causing chip. He knows it isn’t safe.

A Fatality Rate? Great, Says FDA

The FDA approved implantation of microchips in humans despite knowing the cancer implications as early as 2007. Back when Associated Press were a journalism outlet and actually asked questions, the FDA declined to say what studies they based their judgments on. We’re guessing none.

Likely because there weren’t any positive studies and the FDA are corrupt, given they intentionally ignored the cancer causing studies by making an appeal to ignorance fallacy.

‘Millions of pets have been implanted with microchips, without reports of significant problems’ — there’s no formal reporting system for this, so of course there’s no reports. The FDA did just not look, they proactively and maliciously avoided looking.

In-fact, FDA’s callous disregard for patient safety in the name of mass surveillance can be seen as early as 2004, where they approved ‘patients’ (victims) receiving an implantable chip to access medical records (it later turned out the chips could be copied and posed a security vulnerability too):

FDA again followed this trend of ignoring the cancer-causing evidence and high quantity of NeuraLink deaths by approving NeuraLink microchip brain insertions in humans back in May 2023. 1,500 dead animals is a good sign!

This is the same FDA that is in-bed with pharmaceutical companies and approved the DNA containing “COVID-19” shots. So obviously, human safety not priority one.

Why would this pharmaceutical connection matter? Pharmaceutical firm Merck ended up in a legal battle back in 2010 over whether or not their microchips caused cancer in cats. The case also made reference to pharmaceutical firm Schering-Plough:

If this sounds vaguely familiar, it should, it is the same firm vaccine shill Dr Susan Oliver used to work for. What a small world!

Schering-Plough bought out Organon and Organon intended to depopulate humanity.

Talking of pharmaceutical shills…

The United States Equestrian Federation wrote a shill hitpiece trying to insist microchips don’t cause cancer. What they fail to disclose is their financial conflict of interest; one of their big sponsors is Merck animal health, the same people who manufacture the microchips sued for causing cancer!

Mysteriously, the cat cancer microchip legal case went completely silent. No mention on outcome or the person in question who brought the suit, like they just vanished.

Meanwhile, in the UK, back in 2016, a senior vet told small dog owners not to microchip their animals as they would likely suffer adverse reactions — even in breach of UK government’s compulsory microchipping law, showing how strongly they felt about it (where have we heard compulsory medical procedures before?).

Unsafe PET

Weirdly, studies into the harms of implanting microchips seemingly ‘disappeared’ after 2007 (more likely, scientists avoided researching it) despite the compelling findings of cancer. There can’t be harms if they don’t intentionally look for it ala FDA.

We can however infer additional harms based on the materials they use.

RFID chips are typically made from polyethylene tetraphthalate (PET), a type of plastic. Of course, we’re assuming the NeuraLink chips are made from the same substance, but as there’s no public disclosure, this is the best assumption to make.

Micro-plastics are endocrine disrupters:

PET is also suspected to kill cells via Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS):

PET also leaches antimony (Sb) (it’s made using antimony as a catalyst):

Antimony Is Also Toxic

Surprise! It’s even considered to be “possibly carcinogenic” (cancer causing):

Inhaled antimony trioxide was found to cause lung cancer in female rats:

Injected antimony variants (antimony trichloride, not antimony trioxide) were found to cause abnormal developments of babies in the womb. Teratogenic means it causes deformities during development

Antimony variants caused cardiomyopathy in guinea pigs, at a 50% lethality. ECG readings were similar to humans who come into contact with antimony.

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry offers some further insights.

Firstly, some forms of antimony may take longer than weeks to clear :

This may be due to antimony impairing white cell macrophages:

It can kill in higher doses, and be absorbed through the skin (read: it likely can penetrate through any fibrin protection that it might be encased in):