- If there can be a cancer vaccine, then cancer is not what the Science(tm) tells us (a genetic disease).
- The other option is that their "vaccine" is not a vaccine, but another gene editing injection.
IRL cancer is a metabolic disease (w/ a genetic component), which can be prevented/managed with not giving the cancer the energy it requires to grow, by starving it. See the open access papers & interviews from Professor Thomas Seyfried who has spent his life studying cancers in lab. He says the current cancer research has been going nowhere b/c their theory is wrong, as its not mainly a genetic dis-ease.
Yeah, the "vaccine" part I refuse to call it. You'll see I only call it a "cancer shot" (because frankly, I think it gives cancer). There's no logical basis for 'immunisation'; they're just exploiting the remaining good will the term has left for the gullible few who still think they're being remotely honest.
Any genetic modification implies cancer as a risk, and there's a reason why the thumbnail image includes "Frameshift Ward".
There is NO reason to EVER introduce ANYTHING from a needle into one's body, directly into one's bloodstream (except maybe insulin, until that is dealt with properly).
Why not?
Because vaccination is a total and complete FRAUD.
If you take a substance into your body via the digestive system, you can vomit it out, pee it out, poop it out. If you take it into your body directly into your bloodstream, it's IN THERE for long term, if not forever...
The Human Body is a creation that is pre-equipped to handle all sorts of toxic interference, and vaccination has never been shown to be efficacious, or even helpful. We have been duped, for nearly 200 years and thanks to charlatans like Mr. Pasteur, and that is a proven fact. There's an OLD book that tells us WHY this is so, called "Bechamp vs. Pasteur" by Ethel D. Hume, written in 1925. I find some of the terminology to be arcane and unknown to me, and I am not a scientist, but there's enough clear and unambiguous language in that book, with plenty of argument and citation, to educate most of us!
You can get that book, too. Time for a nice mind-blowing day, eh? ^_^
Kudos for this post, Beagle. Same old cat shit, seems we'd be alert for it by now... and we are. I'd venture to say (woof!) that this is not just problem/solution, but also two other thinks: the Nasties are getting scared that we'll catch on and end their income for vaxxxxxing us to debth, and also: EMF's can CAUSE CANCER.
That third thing is the hefalump in the room. It's a YOOOGE hefalump, too.
It was to be expected, it has been talked about for a long time. in addition, the world was mentally prepared for this vaccine, it is said more and more often that in the coming years, 75% of the population will have cancer and all kinds of scary propaganda-style predictions. it's a non-stop dirty business built on the life and suffering of every person in this world.
Is" pirbright" as in "rothchild lord pirbright", as in "pilgrims society"? ...
You can find it in Scottish INU-BRU, for example, however the quantity is tiny [0.002% reportedly] (it also includes Quinine... but also cancer-causing Aspartame):
- If there can be a cancer vaccine, then cancer is not what the Science(tm) tells us (a genetic disease).
- The other option is that their "vaccine" is not a vaccine, but another gene editing injection.
IRL cancer is a metabolic disease (w/ a genetic component), which can be prevented/managed with not giving the cancer the energy it requires to grow, by starving it. See the open access papers & interviews from Professor Thomas Seyfried who has spent his life studying cancers in lab. He says the current cancer research has been going nowhere b/c their theory is wrong, as its not mainly a genetic dis-ease.
Yeah, the "vaccine" part I refuse to call it. You'll see I only call it a "cancer shot" (because frankly, I think it gives cancer). There's no logical basis for 'immunisation'; they're just exploiting the remaining good will the term has left for the gullible few who still think they're being remotely honest.
Any genetic modification implies cancer as a risk, and there's a reason why the thumbnail image includes "Frameshift Ward".
There is NO reason to EVER introduce ANYTHING from a needle into one's body, directly into one's bloodstream (except maybe insulin, until that is dealt with properly).
Why not?
Because vaccination is a total and complete FRAUD.
If you take a substance into your body via the digestive system, you can vomit it out, pee it out, poop it out. If you take it into your body directly into your bloodstream, it's IN THERE for long term, if not forever...
The Human Body is a creation that is pre-equipped to handle all sorts of toxic interference, and vaccination has never been shown to be efficacious, or even helpful. We have been duped, for nearly 200 years and thanks to charlatans like Mr. Pasteur, and that is a proven fact. There's an OLD book that tells us WHY this is so, called "Bechamp vs. Pasteur" by Ethel D. Hume, written in 1925. I find some of the terminology to be arcane and unknown to me, and I am not a scientist, but there's enough clear and unambiguous language in that book, with plenty of argument and citation, to educate most of us!
You can get that book, too. Time for a nice mind-blowing day, eh? ^_^
Spread the word!
Kudos for this post, Beagle. Same old cat shit, seems we'd be alert for it by now... and we are. I'd venture to say (woof!) that this is not just problem/solution, but also two other thinks: the Nasties are getting scared that we'll catch on and end their income for vaxxxxxing us to debth, and also: EMF's can CAUSE CANCER.
That third thing is the hefalump in the room. It's a YOOOGE hefalump, too.
It was to be expected, it has been talked about for a long time. in addition, the world was mentally prepared for this vaccine, it is said more and more often that in the coming years, 75% of the population will have cancer and all kinds of scary propaganda-style predictions. it's a non-stop dirty business built on the life and suffering of every person in this world.
Is" pirbright" as in "rothchild lord pirbright", as in "pilgrims society"? ...
My investigation didn't dig into the origins of the term Pirbright, but if you find anything, feel free to let me know!
Absolutely fabulous expose !
Moderna problems call for Moderna solutions ;)
And what foods are this additive in?
Ironically, it's going to be processed foods.
You can find it in Scottish INU-BRU, for example, however the quantity is tiny [0.002% reportedly] (it also includes Quinine... but also cancer-causing Aspartame):
"Carbonated Water, Sugar, Acid (Citric Acid), Flavourings (Including Caffeine, Ammonium Ferric Citrate & Quinine), Sweeteners (Aspartame, Acesulfame K), Preservative (E211), Colours (Sunset Yellow FCF, Ponceau 4R)."
https://www.agbarr.co.uk/our-brands/barr-soft-drinks/irn-bru/
I saw it said it was usually in water based drinks. Was just wondering if it was in anything else.
Thank-you for answering!
In Fight Club, they sold the fat asses back to them in the form of soap.
In Fight Club, they used lye.
(Remember the 'kiss' scene.)
Is this not what you are looking for?
https://www.labdepotinc.com/p-17340-ferric-ammonium-citrate-green-powder-fcc?gad_source=5