The Man Who Died In 2020 You Need To Know About

If you're worried about mRNA, walk this way...

It is no secret that mRNA is unstable and thus unsafe, but did you know a man died in 2020 who set these terrible affairs in motion decades earlier. Enter…

Philip Leder

Leder died Feb 2, 2020. He was a Geneticist. The NIH tepidly describes him but omits any meaningful details explicitly mentioning mRNA:

Leder’s scientific career at NIH and later at Harvard brought forth breakthroughs in genetic engineering, immunology and cancer research. Career highlights included the development of the first recombinant DNA vector system to meet specified safety standards, which he used to clone the gene for globin (the first cloned mammalian gene), and a series of experiments involving the c-myc gene and Burkitt’s lymphoma that proved that the deregulation of a normal gene can cause cancer.

Note the “recombinant DNA vector system”; AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson’s shots both use genetically modified recombinant DNA adenoviruses.

The only hint he does anything relating to mRNA from this blurb is the word transcription (which is what mRNA does):

Leder taught a course on DNA replication, transcription and translation at NIH for the Foundation for Advanced Education in the Sciences.

Looking at his JSTOR study from 1985 offers some insights on his mRNA work.

Role of an RNA Cleavage/poly (A) Addition Site in the Production of Membrane-Bound and Secreted IgM mRNA

If the phrase ‘Poly (A)’ sounds familiar to you, it ought to. SARS-CoV-2 has a Poly(A) tail:

When Poly(A) Binding Proteins Meet Viral Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2

The poly(A) binding proteins (PABPs), a family of critical gene expression factors, are viruses' common targets

‘Okay, sure, but does this really show he’s working on mRNA?’

The truth would be hidden if it wasn’t for the fact that…

WikiLeaks Blows Open Secrets

Although I’m not a fan of WikiLeaks, giving their failure to publish the EMA leak and perchant for citing defamation-heavy Southern Poverty Law Center against Christians, there are some nuggets (like with any unreliable source) to be found, if you dig far enough.

It turns out the US was already aware of mRNA regulation and control gene expression as early as 1974, in regards to Philip Leder’s work in a diplomatic message:

PURPOSE OF THIS APPOINTMENT WILL BE TO GAIN EXPERIENCE

IN AREA OF CHEMICAL SYNTHESES OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND THEIR

USE IN AFFINITY CHROMOTOGRAPHI PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO

ISOLATE SPECIFIC MESSENGER RNAS. ISOLATION OF SPECIFIC

MRNA HAS BECOME IMPORTANT PART OF VARIETY OF STUDIES OF

REGULATION AND EXPRESSION OF SPECIFIC MAMMALIAN GENES.

Source: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/1974STATE094916_b.html

The part where it says “mRNA has become important part of variety of studies of regulation and expression of specific mammalian genes” is the damning part because it refutes the media’s lies that mRNA does not affect genes, and instead shows not only do they do so, but the whole point of mRNA research was specifically about controlling genes.

For those of you needing a little jargon busting: ‘mammalian’ means ‘of mammals’, which is basically any warm blooded creature that gives live birth (with the exception of platypuses; who are mammals who lay eggs. Don’t ask).

That means it also includes you, as a human: warm blooded, gives live birth, a mammal. Regulation means to ‘suppress’ (‘regulations like a law’) and expression means to ‘increase’ (‘express yourself’). It doesn’t replace the genes, but it does control them. If you’re still confused, let me explain.

Lightbulb Moment

A good analogy is imagine you have four lightbulbs. Changing a gene would involve replacing the lightbulb. You might swap it with a red, or green, or yellow bulb.

Regulating a bulb means you might turn down the lightbulb, like a dimmer switch, or turn it off completely. The bulb is still there. It’s just not ‘on’, it isn’t ‘expressing itself’.

Expression means you turn the lightbulb up, until it is fully on. The light bulb is still there, but now it is on. You might be thinking ‘that’s weird, aren’t all genes normally on?’ but it turns out, even if they’re there, they’re not always on.

Like lightbulbs four lightbulbs in a house at night, not all bulbs will be switched on, even if you expect most of them to be. One might be off. Or all four. Or none.

In-fact, there is a dedicated area of study for this phenomena called…

Epigenetics

As the NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences) notes (emphasis added):

The answer is epigenetics, a rapidly growing area of science that focuses on the processes that help direct when individual genes are turned on or off. While the cell’s DNA provides the instruction manual, genes also need specific instructions. In essence, epigenetic processes tell the cell to read specific pages of the instruction manual at distinct times.

Now, normally Epigenetics is associated to environmental factors rather than biological ones (hence why it is hosted on the ‘Environmental Health Sciences’ page), however, introducing a poison into your body is environmental (such as breathing in toxins from the air… or getting injected with a poison).

So mRNA actually controls the power to turn genes on and off. But it turns out WikiLeaks hides one more damning blow to the ‘doesn’t control genes’ narrative.

Moderna’s Stock Listing

A weird thing to cite, right? And even weirder thing for someone to have pre-emptively back in 2015 in a spyfile. But here it is. Read their listing from Jan 7th, 2015 (emphasis added):

Moderna Therapeutics has raised $450 million in funding that will be used to support the further expansion of the company's mRNA Therapeutics platform, which produces human proteins, antibodies and novel protein constructs inside patient cells that are then secreted or already active intracellularly. Moderna currently has 45 preclinical programs in active development, spanning oncology and cardiovascular, rare and infectious diseases.

Source: https://wikileaks.org/hackingteam/emails/emailid/306807

Wait, what? Already active? Constructed inside patient cells and secreted? Basically Moderna’s listing explicitly admits that mRNA’s purpose is to convert cells into protein manufacturers. The very same mRNA that evidence shows is highly unstable.

And, notice they were already pitching to the very diseases their own shots cause? Oncology (cancer) and cardiovascular (heart and blood; heart attacks, blood clots), as well as “rare” (monkeypox?) and “infectious” ones (AIDs?).

So nice of them to build the “solutions” to the very problems they happen to be creating. Pre-planned genetic switches from 1974 and “solutions” to heart attacks from shots planned in 2015.

If you like my work, be sure to support it by sharing the article link with other people, subscribing or even becoming a supporter. Thank you!