Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Might be worth citing this manuscript too, from 2012.

Kühl U, Schultheiss HP: Myocarditis—early biopsy allows for tailored regenerative treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(20): 361–8.

DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0361

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22685492/

Quote: "Acute myocarditis mostly does not sufficiently respond to symptomatic medication for heart failure, and mortality is high in spite of treatment. The long-term disease course de pends on the pathogen, the extent and type of inflammation, and the initial injury to the myo - cardium. Focal borderline myocarditis often undergoes spontaneous clinical healing if no serious heart failure

developed initially. The early mortality of fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis requiring intensive care is in excess of 40% in the first 4 weeks (7). Untreated giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis also have an extremely poor prognosis, with 4 year survival rates of less than 20% (8). Granulomatous necrotizing myo - carditis is lethal if overlooked and untreated. Nonfulminant active myocarditis has a mortality rate of 25% to 56% within 3 to 10 years, owing to progressive heart failure and sudden cardiac death, especially if symptomatic heart failure manifests early on (9–11, e1). In addition to impaired left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function, virus persistence, chronic inflammation, and cardiodepressive autoantibodies are independent predictors of a poor prognosis (9, 12, 13)."

Expand full comment
TriTorch's avatar

You do great work! Your experience is very similar to this:

We always hear it getting drilled into us to trust "the science". But why should we, when the elites running the NGOs, the politicians, and even the scientists themselves do not? How do we know this? Because they keep moving the goalposts and changing "the science" of this charade pandemic. So far they've have altered the definitions of:

Herd Immunity: now only includes those vaccinated—They removed ‘natural immunity’ altogether

Vaccine: no longer grants immunity from disease. Now merely gives ‘protection’.

Pandemic: no longer requires mass sickness and death. Disease merely needs to be widespread.

In January of 2020 - just as COVID was reaching the national stage - France inexplicably labeled HCQ a poisonous substance and banned it. Up until that point in France, HCQ had been an over the counter drug - as easy to get as Tylenol in America - for many years:

Ivermectin is vouched for by a large number of doctors with first hand experience to be both safe and extraordinarily effective in treating COVID-19. It is also very cheap.

Meanwhile, the entire edifice of authority from the media, to the pharmaceutical industry, to the government, to the NGOs, want to kill and bury Ivermectin as deep as possible under mountains of propaganda as a verifiable effective therapeutic. And they are willing to destroy the reputations and livelihoods of anyone who gets in their way to achieve that.

This despite the fact that it's been on the WHO's Essential Medicines List for decades.

If there is a treatment for a disease the FDA cannot grant an EUA for a competing treatment, in COVID's case, the vaccine. Put on your detective shoes, think critically about this for a minute, and follow the money.

References to all of the above here: https://tritorch.com/memoryhole

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts