NIH Deletes Myocarditis Fatality Rate, Falsifies Date
Vaccine shills can't win, so they censor and mislead
A quick article on this as the audacity of this stunt has to be exposed.
Recently the Daily Beagle had been debating vaccine shills by quoting excerpts of myocarditis fatality rates to refute their dishonest claims ‘myocarditis is mild’:
Notice the date of the Tweet (thus screenshot) is from November 30th, 2023. However, the webpage now falsely claims the last update was November 20th, 2023; somehow 10 days before the screenshot was taken:
This is despite the fact an archive from November 21st 2023 does not show it as being updated in November 20th 2023, but September 6th 2022, showing the date has been intentionally falsified to pre-date the Tweet in order to ‘win’ the argument:
If we look at the censored version, we can see the line after ‘dilated cardiomyopathy’ is missing, along with the following wording changes:
‘all patients’ has been replaced with ‘all individuals’
‘diagnosed or suspected’ has been swapped around to say ‘suspected’ first, then ‘diagnosed’
‘ventricular dysrhythmias’ (which is the older writing style of the book) has been replaced with ‘ventricular arrhythmias’ (which is a newer, modern style not found in the book)
‘left ventricular aneurysm’ has become ‘left ventricular aneurysms’.
Notice everything has been done to downplay the harms of myocarditis. ‘Patient’ to ‘individual’ makes it falsely seem like they’re not undergoing treatment, and the removal of the fatality rate makes it clear they’re trying to cover up the deaths.
The key missing line is the one showing how harmful and deadly myocarditis is (it will still be in the book, but the pre-face page has censored it).
“The mortality rate is up to 20% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years. Despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in the last 30 years.
So, if you get accused of child murder for pushing a shot that causes myocarditis, with medical evidence of fatality being 50%, don’t admit error, just censor the inconvenient evidence and retroactively post-date the new article to before the argument happened in order to win, and cover-up your crimes against humanity!
The depths these child murderers will stoop to is unbecoming.
Found this informative?
Get revenge on NIH censorship and share?
What do you think, dear reader? Let us know in the comments.
Might be worth citing this manuscript too, from 2012.
Kühl U, Schultheiss HP: Myocarditis—early biopsy allows for tailored regenerative treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(20): 361–8.
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0361
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22685492/
Quote: "Acute myocarditis mostly does not sufficiently respond to symptomatic medication for heart failure, and mortality is high in spite of treatment. The long-term disease course de pends on the pathogen, the extent and type of inflammation, and the initial injury to the myo - cardium. Focal borderline myocarditis often undergoes spontaneous clinical healing if no serious heart failure
developed initially. The early mortality of fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis requiring intensive care is in excess of 40% in the first 4 weeks (7). Untreated giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis also have an extremely poor prognosis, with 4 year survival rates of less than 20% (8). Granulomatous necrotizing myo - carditis is lethal if overlooked and untreated. Nonfulminant active myocarditis has a mortality rate of 25% to 56% within 3 to 10 years, owing to progressive heart failure and sudden cardiac death, especially if symptomatic heart failure manifests early on (9–11, e1). In addition to impaired left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function, virus persistence, chronic inflammation, and cardiodepressive autoantibodies are independent predictors of a poor prognosis (9, 12, 13)."
You do great work! Your experience is very similar to this:
We always hear it getting drilled into us to trust "the science". But why should we, when the elites running the NGOs, the politicians, and even the scientists themselves do not? How do we know this? Because they keep moving the goalposts and changing "the science" of this charade pandemic. So far they've have altered the definitions of:
Herd Immunity: now only includes those vaccinated—They removed ‘natural immunity’ altogether
Vaccine: no longer grants immunity from disease. Now merely gives ‘protection’.
Pandemic: no longer requires mass sickness and death. Disease merely needs to be widespread.
In January of 2020 - just as COVID was reaching the national stage - France inexplicably labeled HCQ a poisonous substance and banned it. Up until that point in France, HCQ had been an over the counter drug - as easy to get as Tylenol in America - for many years:
Ivermectin is vouched for by a large number of doctors with first hand experience to be both safe and extraordinarily effective in treating COVID-19. It is also very cheap.
Meanwhile, the entire edifice of authority from the media, to the pharmaceutical industry, to the government, to the NGOs, want to kill and bury Ivermectin as deep as possible under mountains of propaganda as a verifiable effective therapeutic. And they are willing to destroy the reputations and livelihoods of anyone who gets in their way to achieve that.
This despite the fact that it's been on the WHO's Essential Medicines List for decades.
If there is a treatment for a disease the FDA cannot grant an EUA for a competing treatment, in COVID's case, the vaccine. Put on your detective shoes, think critically about this for a minute, and follow the money.
References to all of the above here: https://tritorch.com/memoryhole