Dr Susan Oliver, Vaccine Shill

As others fall, new ones join the ranks

Disclaimer: This Article Is Not Legal Advice. Speak With A Legal Professional.

Susan Oliver is a Twitter poster who seeks to “debunk” people critical of vaccines by writing weird, nonsense arguments, such as suggesting you shouldn’t be suspicious of events if they occur after something (perhaps they have a time machine?).

Their Twitter bio vaguely states they are a “scientist” (‘trust the science’), but their pose shot in a bright pink ‘lab coat’ should raise suspicions:

Passionate about correcting misinformation, eh? Oddly Susan Oliver does not disclose her conflicts of interest in her bio, namely, that she received money from the pro-vaccine Australian government…

And that she has ties to vaccine manufacturing Schering-Plough:

Schering-Plough are a US-based animal vaccine manufacturer:

In 2007, they acquired Organon BioSciences from Akzo Nobel, to the tune of 11 billion:

Organon are involved in the usual depopulation agenda schemes:

They even financed $30 million to ‘end pregnancies’:

They even have a target of how many pregnancies they want to stop: 120 million, by 2030:

This oddly coincides with the suspiciously and seemingly child-less Susan Oliver, who has a dog in a baby pram (top right), but apparently no baby photos:

The people who claim to be concerned with saving lives having a specified target in how many human lives they want to reduce the world by. Not exactly trustworthy.

In 2009 Schering-Plough were reverse-merged into Merck using a weird fudge, so Merck and Schering-Plough could retain the rights to a drug, Remicade, which would have defaulted to Johnson&Johnson if Schering-Plough lost ownership control.

They became the ‘animal health division’ of Merck:

Of course, Merck have a long history of vaccine manufacture:

Including, surprise, an attempt at the SARS-CoV-2 poison shot, which despite the corruption of regulators, managed to fail:

So, is it any wonder a stooge with ties to Merck would attack those undercutting the profitability of the SARS-CoV-2 shots? What about the Australian government?

Out-Of-Sight, Out-Of-Mind

Of course the Australian government — liable for damages from vaccine injury if it came out — would have reason to hire someone to peddle bizarre excuses for the vaccine injuries.

In one instance, Steve Kirsch made her an offer to come disprove his criticisms of vaccines. Her reply oddly insinuated that she had no medical training:

Explain why asking the opinion of people with no medical training or understanding of scientific methods is not a valid way to determine vaccine deaths.

Given Steve Kirsch was asking her, then she is basically saying she has no medical training or understanding of scientific methods.

Either this was the most questionable, most poorly thought out rebuttal imaginable (suggesting her judgement cannot be trusted), or she was basically admitting to Steve he ought to go ask someone who is actually qualified, implying she isn’t (we’d agree).

What a most bizarre reply from someone supposedly combatting ‘misinformation’.

Despite Kirsch’s offer for a debate, Susan not only ignored the invite, but did a ‘reverse invite’, just so they could falsely proclaim Kirsh declined their offer, when they actually declined his:

Susan had earlier said she isn’t “stupid enough” to “waste time” conducting a survey of her readers (likely because the poll results would not go in her favour). But she’s fine wasting time doing political stunts and name-calling:

Ad Hominems

Susan doesn’t offer well thought out or intellectual retorts, but merely ad hominems, insulting the individual and not addressing the point:

Apparently referring to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System as evidence of harms from vaccines is a “stupid antivaxxer comment”. Even though this is what VAERS is designed to do.

Unless Susan now suggests the HHS who invented it are ‘antivaxxers’? Or is it only vaccine cultists may interpret the word of vaccine, and anyone who disagrees is not permitted?

When she isn’t attacking people, she makes weird generalist arguments that abuse appeals to fallacies. For example, Susan doesn’t permit anyone to assume that if they got injured after taking the shot, that the shot caused it. Perhaps the magic tooth fairy did it instead?

Notice Susan isn’t denying the injuries exist, just she is insisting you simply don’t attribute them to the vaccines. Blame anything but their perfect god, the vaccine!

She offers no explanation as to where the injuries have come from, why they didn’t occur before the shots during the peak of the supposed pandemic, and fails to explain why it shouldn’t be attributed to the shots, with the shots being the only new change.

This likely has more to do with massive financial — and legal — conflicts of interest Susan Oliver has involved in the development of the shots. If she was overseeing their development and failed to announce fraud or criminal activity, she’d be just as culpable as the rest.

Susan Oliver is just one more vaccine shill in a conga line, much like Ian Copeland.

---

Subscribe to The Daily Beagle to receive more content.

Raise awareness!

Or leave a comment below: