"Then Delete Your Account" - Elon Musk

Elon Mask wants your facial recognition mask as spat over block grows

Delete For Free Speech

James Woods had levelled a criticism at Elon Musk over his plans to destroy the block feature on Twitter, given James Woods has experienced coordinated harassment attacks on Twitter from 30 trolls previously (to the point of litigation with said trolls).

Elon Musk gave him the proverbial ‘go fuck yourself’ and told him to delete his account.

This is particularly fresh given how much fretting Elon Musk did previously about people tracking his private jet in real time; he banned elonjet, if you recall, despite lying and saying he wouldn’t.

Canadian Lawyer and well known YouTuber Viva Frei was so shocked by Elon Musk’s brash attitude telling James Woods to ‘delete their account’ that he refused to believe it was Elon Musk himself:

Saying Elon Musk is being run by an impersonator is a great ‘copium’ tactic, except Elon Musk implemented a ban on Elon Musk impersonators who don’t clearly mark themselves as parody, as you recall.

So this would mean any unmarked “impersonation” would be done with Elon Musk’s consent, I.E. a deception he approves of.

The Daily Beagle has been quite vocal in highlighting examples of “Elon Mask” clearly acting as controlled opposition (ConOp). For example, Elon claimed to be critical and suspicious of the shots, but did you know Tesla manufactures mRNA for CureVac?

He didn’t highlight that ‘in bed with the shot sellers’ so vocally. Then there was the time he mass banned Substack. Only after massive backlash did he allow the links to be posted, but not embed (embedding is where the thumbnail image appears, and it improves click-through rates). Rules for thee on blocking.

Viva is being charitably kind to Elon, but Elon has a clear trend of authoritarianism and power-tripping, even ‘suspending’ (banning) those who point out Twitter is a giant information honeypot. The title of the article? “Criticise Musk's Plans, Get Suspended”. James Woods had a close run-in.

The criticism that got the account suspended? Pointing out Twitter is a giant honey pot.

Twitter Plans To Sell Your Data To Facial Recognition Intel Agency Firm

PC Magazine published an article declaring Twitter will have users submit a ‘selfie’ along with a ‘government issued ID’, so they can share it with AU10TIX. Twitter frantically rushed out to “fact check” it as ‘optional’:

‘Optional’, like the shots were ‘optional’; either quit your job or get your shot. Either delete your account or accept the changes. The “factcheck” cited an unheard of website suspiciously called “socialmediatoday” as ‘evidence’:

Even if we take the “factcheck” as face value; Twitter will simply deboost non-Blue users (remember the post count restrictions?) to the point of zero reach. The message from the globalists? Submit to digital surveillance and control or no-one will see your posts.

This mirrors The Daily Beagle’s tongue-in-cheek prediction on Elon Musk’s ConOp perfectly. We even guessed the future name correctly (this was written last year):

AU10TIX Are Part Of A Facial Recognition Mass Surveillance Company

AU10TIX are a subsidiary of ICTS International N.V. (N.V. indicates it is a Netherlands registered company, however they’re operated out of Israel).

AU10TIX are partnered with pro-vaccine Microsoft, no doubt so the two pro-mass surveillance companies can pool their surveillance data together:

AU10TIX makes use of AI for ‘KYC’ (Know Your Customer). KYC is an ID verification requirement for ‘anti-money laundering’, however KYC does not require facial recognition nor the use of AI:

AU10TIX are partnered with Thomson Reuters (the same Thomson Reuters with ties to Pfizer).

The Thomson Reuters article has a thumbnail image hinting at facial recognition (the facial mapping mask and face box identifier), but the article itself mysteriously doesn’t mention the words and only talks about ‘synthetic identities’ (read: fake images):

That’s fine, though, as AU10TIX in their blog talk about facial recognition based on AI machine learning…

…Hang around on their web page long enough, and it will pop-up a claim it is a “fully automated Identity Verification solution”…

…this is on an article that mentions “Selfie-to-ID face matching” (read: facial recognition performed on your ‘selfie’)…

Sounds bad? Gets worse.

Connected To An Intel Agency Firm

AU10TIX’s parent company, ICTS International N.V. was established in 1982 by former agents of Shin Bet and former El Al airline security agents:

They also have ties to the Dutch government (in a revolving door job, they set the airport security guidelines, which no doubt favours their own business model):

They operate airport screening services, beside other surveillance and datamining services. Airport checkpoints, travel documents, X-ray machines, etc). Yes, exactly the kind of airport people you’re thinking of.

And yes, it does also include American airports. At the bottom of the ICTS International N.V. holdings page, are ICTS’ holdings (subsidaries; connected companies) listed, including Huntleigh USA:

Huntleigh USA’s page declares it deals with airport security, including ‘baggage handling’:

I-SEC operate airport security in mostly European countries. ICTS datamine and profile airline passengers Minority-Report style to assess how much of a threat they are:

You can bet the Farm it will be used to profile and assess Twitter users for their level of threat as well, as The Daily Beagle predicted.

Delete your account: probably the best-worst advice for a data mass surveillance company imaginable.

Summary

James Woods complained he needed Twitter's block function to deal with stalkers he's litigating. Elon Musk, who hates impersonation and stalking, and has banned stalkers before, told Woods to delete his account. Viva Frei refused to believe this was Elon. The Daily Beagle provided prior examples of Elon Musk acting two-faced.

Twitter is using an Israel intel agency connected firm called AU10TIX, known to profile airline passengers for 'threat level', to datamine selfies using AI facial recognition for Twitter Blue verification. 

Twitter 'factcheck' claimed it was optional, but Twitter plans to deboost non-Blue accounts, effectively coercing them into giving away ID, confirming a prediction by The Daily Beagle that Twitter would be used to identify "threats" to the government's regime. One account was suspended already for making the "honeypot" observation.

Join Gab.com if you haven’t already; speech is open, block functions work, and no selfies required.

---

Found this informative? Receive more for free!

Raise awareness?

What do you think, dear reader?