Why You Can't Trust Medical Advice On Vaccines
Raking in the cash
Nearly everyone agrees that medical professionals should be free of conflicts-of-interest, presenting you with neutral, unbiased language on the appropriate types of medical support that is tailored to your personal situation.
Medical Professionals Are Bribed For Specific Actions
Back in 2021, as part of a campaign to raise awareness on the deep issues of the COVID-19 shots, the COVID-19 questions document was drafted, with an eye towards both warning of the shots and raising awareness.
One citation included an article by CBS News back in 2017, showing that by 2015, already half of the US healthcare workforce of doctors had been compromised by kickbacks:
Those of you familiar with the ‘10% for the Big Guy’ will instinctively know what a kickback is. For those of you not familiar, a kickback is where a person agrees a contract or service or product, knowing they will receive a portion of the profits ‘back’ from the other side (the portion given back is called a ‘kickback’).
For example, a politician or public servant agrees a military procurement contract with a weapons contractor, and the contractor donates to the politician’s campaign funds in the next election cycle.
This is a crime within US law, and many industries are impacted by this.
$2.4 billion in kickbacks is a mindblowing number. According to Statista.com, there were just over 1 million doctors in the US in 2015:
Assuming half that number (~500,000) took $2.4 billion in kickbacks evenly, that would mean they gained $4,800 each. This isn’t a handful of pens; this is a sizeable chunk of money. One distorting your healthcare treatments, and costs of living.
In November 2013, Johnson&Johnson — same manufacturer of the horribly toxic adenovirus shot — paid more than $2.2 billion to settle allegations with the Department of Justice over kickbacks for drugs:
That settlement would foot the majority of the 2015 kickback bill alone, so it is clear the extent of kickbacks is far worse than what CBS have reported. That is just the kickbacks that were found. Far many are not found.
And if bribes don’t work, then pharmaceutical companies conspire with bought-out medical professionals to ruin the reputations of doctors who dissent (point raised by Jikkyleaks), much like what happened to Dr Andrew Wakefield:
Now Bribes Are Commonplace
Bribing the decisions of doctors is now medically institutionalised. Instead of corrupt pharmaceutical companies paying for it themselves, they’re stealing from the taxpayer to bribe them via the government.
The NHS in the UK (credit to source: Sarah Nellie), have this scheme in place:
Clicking the very first PDF (page 26) leads you to a document where someone has already highlighted in yellow the bribery parts:
£5 to £10 per shot administered! £200 as an additional payment for every ‘Completed Care Home’ as if it is some sort of mass production line facility with no personal free choice. Would this unethically influence medical behaviour? Absolutely!
As critic of NHS corruption GP Dr David Cartland exposed, one GP, ‘Dr Eilir Hughes’ tried to get 4,000 shots rolled out in a weekend, under the nonsense excuse it was to ‘protect rural areas’:
The BMJ reported how payment historically was £12.58 per shot back in 2020:
In 2021, the Independent reported it was between £15-£30 per shot:
‘Rewarded?’ … bribed, more like. At 4,000 shots £12.58 per shot, Eilir would be making a whopping £50,302, in a single weekend. A year’s wage! Is this what impartial medical decision making looks like? Jabs on speed dial?
Healthcare professionals are already salaried employees. They do not need super-duper extra bonuses for undertaking specific medical actions. This is clearly a financial conflict of interest that drastically bias medical decision making, and it is not exclusive to the UK.
In Australia (ignore Sky News’ misleading title) it was between $26 to a whopping $50 per shot:
The money grubbing so-called ‘healthcare professionals’ were in on it, where so-called ‘Dr Maria Boulton’ demanded the government double the per-shot bribes or they would pull out:
Is this what caring, patient-centric healthcare looks to you? ‘Give us the money or we’ll withdraw our services’?
Why, what don’t they like about giving the shots that require the bribe money be doubled for them to continue to administer it? They’re already full-time salaried employees. Is it to do with the fact Australian healthcare workers aren’t indemnified?
Happens In America
The US also does kickback schemes for the vaccines. USA today tried to do a ‘factcheck’ where they didn’t deny the claims… they just insisted the so-called ‘bonuses’ were based on some other metrics as well:
PolitiFact falsely tried to claim it was simply false:
A small problem with that. In the (attached) document "2016 Performance Recognition Program" for the "Blue Care Network" [BCN] (part of Blue Cross Blue Shield based in Michigan)…
…it clearly states they will pay $400 per ‘combo 10’ (combination 10 criteria) they administer:
So, it is true. And clearly so.
As much as media outlets try to desperately invent deflections for their pharmaceutical financiers (for the media’s sponsorships and adverts come indeed from pharmaceutical companies), the evidence is clear that healthcare professionals are both bribed and coerced into forcing these shots onto people.
There’s even a PopSugar article where they admit to receiving kickbacks… even though kickbacks are illegal… but then disputing the source of the finances:
Despite having hosted the article…
PopSugar have since deleted the evidence after media outlets decided to spread the lie that doctors don’t get financial bribes for specific decision making.
Then There’s The Revolving Door Jobs, Too
As noted in our previous article “A Balanced Discussion On Masks”, it turns out a great many UK government cronies are in the employ, or financial receipt of, industries that stand to benefit from such fearmongering.
Copying the vaccine-relevant segments, we have:
Patrick Vallance under GlaxoSmithKline (yesman Hancock: ‘Government’s Chief Scientific Advisor has no input into contractual and commercial decisions on vaccine procurement’ — What? Scientific advisor doesn’t advise on science?)
Rishi Sunak’s shares in Theleme who in turn have shares in Moderna. Sunak gave Moderna a 10-year contract with the UK for no good reason.
Neil Ferguson’s overinflated death predictions in advocacy of extreme measures (has a history of blowing things out of proportion) [same bad statistics Imperial College London as ‘Viki’ Male who uses skewered datasets to falsely claim shots are safe for pregnancy]
Then we have the various Universities who want to cash-grab pharmaceutical grant monies, such as the University of Edinburgh, and those that want to cash in on manufacturing the shots, such as Imperial College London (mentioned above), Rutgers University, and Baylor College of Medicine, to mention a few.
Then we have such classics as Scott Gottlieb, member of the Pfizer board of Directors, former commissioner of the FDA and former head of his own pharmaceutical firm…
…Stephen Hahn, also former commissioner of the FDA, who joined Flagship Pioneering, a venture capital firm that launched Moderna…
Then there’s the FDA in general:
[…] researchers who studied the careers of FDA medical reviewers found that more than half of the hematology-oncology assessors who reviewed drugs between 2001 and 2010 went on to work for the biopharmaceutical industry.
TheUnderdog: In my own personal experience of the NHS, care homes were doing this as well. Lobbyists for care homes would show up to hospital care pathway decision making centres with ‘goodie bags’ (including pens, per Jikkyleak’s above tweet), and boxes of cakes and various food treats. The pens try to act as a reminder ‘think of us… think of us…’ with the constant branding. Even the goodie bags would be branded.
The lobbyists wouldn’t say anything, knowing full well this would break the law, but the influence was evident: ‘send elderly our way and get more treats’, ‘pick us we’re the “nice” people’. The lobbyists don’t strictly hand out cash to people, they get creative in their bribery and influence to skirt the law. Look up doctors who receive ‘nice meals’, for example.
The offering of gifts creates a ‘social debt’ that obliges the ‘other’ to repay. Accepting any such things should, frankly, be an offence. Medical decision making should weigh on the patient’s choices, not how nice the box of flapjacks from a sellout shill are.
NHS management were far too comfortable with what were inappropriate visits by said lobbyists offering what were de facto bribes to influence healthcare decision making. I have the distinction of not accepting any of their bribery trash, even objecting to it, unfortunately to no avail.
This is despite the fact their visits constitute a patient-doctor privacy violation as well (they have line-of-sight on any patient records that happen to be viewed in said decision making centre). Not strictly on topic about vaccines but thought you’d be interested in how broken the medical system is.
One thing is for sure, you cannot trust medical advice on vaccines with so much money and conflicts of interest rolling about. They’re just raking it in!
Summary
Even as early as 2015, about half of US doctors were in receipt of kickbacks for off-label drug prescribing to the tune of $2.4 billion. Johnson&Johnson settled $2.2 billion with the DoJ alone.
Lobbyists will use a variety of tactics, including pens, goodie bags, food treats, meals, paying for travel and just straight up paying cash based on how well they peddle a product.
This has become institutionalised, with the governments acting on pharmaceutical companies' behalf, bribing doctors with money for every shot administered, whilst greenlighting 'below radar' lobbyist activities.
Bribes for shots occur in many countries, including the UK, US, and Australia. One British GP tried to get 4,000 jabs into arms over the weekend, who would be in receipt of an estimated whopping £50,302.
Despite media gaslighting, bribes-for-shots is evident, as are the revolving door jobs between regulators, and pharmaceutical companies, such as Scott Gottlieb, Stephen Hahn, Rishi Sunak, Patrick Vallance, Jonathan Van-Tam, Neil Ferguson and 'Viki Male'. Universities often also have a financial conflict of interest.
Lobbyists within healthcare are painfully commonplace.Read Our Other Related Articles?
Found this informative? Receive more for free!
Raise awareness?
What do you think, dear reader? Let us know in the comments.
When we realised that pre-existing and proven SAFE non-vax 'cures' for viral diseases, like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc, suddenly disappeared from the WHO's recommended list of "the most important drugs every country should have", in order to make way for the unsafe, barely trialled, inadequately tested (even on mice), DEADLY INJECTIONS they call vaccines, we knew there was skulduggery afoot!
Did you notice that Flu mysteriously disappeared from the face of the earth in early 2020, making way for the man-enhanced Covid virus! The stats are embarrassingly obvious about what really went on since the planned release of COVID and subsequent Big Pharma's DEADLY Vax MARKETING CAMPAIGN for jabs they call "Vaccines"!
See the ridiculously unbelievable but patently clear WHO Charts!
The next virus is already in Gates's Pipeline. He's told us "it will make you take notice this time!"
And all the while, Big Pharma claim TOTAL IMPUNITY from all Vax-related DEATHS and Injuries! What a fantastic Business Plan.
NO LIABILITY is the biggest clue these jabs are potentially LETHAL!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
It is a fact that pediatricians in the US are monetarily incentivied to get all the children in their practice vaccinated with the full CDC requirements (up to 73 by age 18.) $ for each vax, and the higher percentage of your practice is vaxxed, the more money. It is why pediatricians will kick people out of their practice for choosing to not vaccinate their children. So how is that NOT an illegal kickback?