Matt Hancock Commits Perjury By Lying In Court

Provably false claims about Midazolam

Vaccine cultist Daily Mail screeched about an “anti-vaxxer” who dared confront Matt Hancock over his involvement in the Midazolam murders, with Matt Hancock falsely claiming he didn’t have any knowledge.

For those of you new to The Daily Beagle, the Midazolam murders refers to when the elderly were bumped off in shockingly high numbers during March-April 2020, corresponding to a huge spike in Midazolam prescriptions which paralleled a massive spike in deaths.

The Daily Beagle presented a landside of evidence and figures, including a peer reviewed paper, that showed the deaths were people with dementia, not COVID-19, with an abnormal increase in deaths.

At no other point during 2020 were there such a massive spike in prescriptions of Midazolam. Quack Hancock committed perjury to Westminster Magistrate’s Court…

…by falsely and fraudulently claiming he had never heard of Midazolam until after he heard the so-called “conspiracy theory” (the usual slur used by propagandists for factually accurate information):

Except this is an outright, provably false lie, meaning Matt Hancock has committed perjury by lying to a court of law in order to convict another person (A.K.A. perversion of the course of justice).

Matt Hancock had heard of Midazolam prior to the theory emerging… back in April 2020 when he discussed Midazolam with Dr Luke Evans in a Parliamentary hearing, where he had discussed the supply chain for it:

Even when on official record, Matt Hancock still outright lies to a court of law about having “never even heard of midazolam”. Perhaps Dr Luke Evans — whom The Daily Beagle exposed — can help remind Matt Hancock to be truthful?

We won’t hold our breath. What do you think, dear reader?

---

Subscribe for free to get more content from the Daily Beagle.

Raise Awareness.

And leave your thoughts in the comments below: