The Morality Paradox
Why freedom fighters don't (yet) fight for freedom
In response to being massacred by the poison shot (or whichever disastrous harm you care to pick), the British public have rallied to… cut down ULEZ cameras.
Curiously ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone) is the only topic so far that has seen the rise of a meaningful, productive, even organised resistance movement. From people slapping on stickers…
…to YouTubers “not” posting the locales of where ULEZ vans are kept overnight…
…to old people dressing up as dinosaurs to block the ULEZ cameras on vans…
…it is a quintessentially British movement, that is to say, particularly devoid of violence. We are being potentially mass sterilised, denied access to healthcare maliciously, as our children get murdered, and the resistance movement response boils down to… dressing up as dinosaurs and slapping stickers on cameras?
They’ll Rise Up… Any Day Now…
Nearly every self-professed scholar, armchair or otherwise, always opines when push comes to shove, an angry populace will rise up, pitchforks and all, and overthrow a tyrannical government.
We can see here that simply isn’t the case. The general public in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia — even during the peak public massacres — did not rise up (‘oh no, we might get killed if we resist this killing’). Mao’s Communist China was effectively unopposed, and Xi’s China has 1.2 billion shuffling in a digital mass surveillance slave state; and we’re following suit. 1.2 billion! Following one man!
Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro… there are endless examples of people who take power and stay there for decades unopposed regardless of how awful their policies are. Revolutions like the American war of Independence are the exception, not the norm: they’re so rare the only example for fighting for freedom people use is nearly 250 years old. The French Revolution is almost practically the same age.
‘It’s a disarmed populace’ people lacking introspection cry. Brits lack the necessary innovation to know how to build build guns, supposedly.
American gun owners often remark their guns are there to stop a tyrannical government, but unused, one emerged anyway. How did you get beat by a dementia patient? What’s the point in guns if they stay clean on a shelf?
Why Freedom Fighters Don’t Fight For Freedom
Comedian George Carlin famously asked:
Well, if crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters fight fires, what do freedom fighters fight?
Not a lot it seems. But why?
Freedom fighters hate the idea of killing people. Murderous psychopaths don’t. So when war boils down to who can kill the most in a battle of force, freedom fighters don’t step up… they step down.
This is the morality paradox: how can people who despise senseless murder fight back if violence and murder is the only option to stop violent psychopaths?
They’re automatically positioned to be pacifists who will never fight back, not even for their own children’s future. It does not matter how many children AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and the colluting governments murder, parents will whimper in the corner they cannot get justice and beg for crowdfunding from a largely apathetic public.
In any other country, entire armed militias would have formed chanting ‘death to [insert name]’. Entire mobs will form if they believe one black guy is killed by a police officer, but if millions of black people are killed by pharmaceutical companies in consort with government there will be no protest in the streets.
If freedom fighters can’t vote tyrants out of power and they won’t utilise violence to defeat mass murderers then you’re shit out of luck as a freedom fighter, and no amount of whining online will change the status quo.
They balk at the idea of murdering even one person, regardless of how Hitler-esque that person might be, that they self-defeat themselves long before any jackboot has kicked down their front door; so when the jackboot does inevitably boot down their door, they can’t even speak up, let alone fight back.
Of course it’s illegal to revolt. Why would a tyrant ever make it legal to overthrow them?
Sure, there’s plenty of talk that ‘if it happens here, we’ll show them’, but it is happening here, and you’re not showing them. Dinosaur costumes? Stickers? Bouncy Castles? What next, free kids toy? British police forcefully arrest a woman for silent prayer and you’re slapping stickers on cameras?
A dead black guy resulted in businesses being burned; a massacre of children results in... well, nothing, really. Even the dinosaur costumes and stickers are for ULEZ. Was World War 2 won with placards?
How Does A Revolution Start Anyway?
A revolution appears to be comprised of moral greys, people who have no qualms actually killing and doing the hard, brutal work of fighting, but aren’t so deposed to killing they become immoral psychopaths in and of themselves much like the mass murdering psychopaths in power.
What actually sparks such people to revolt is another question entirely. One of the key technologies that seems to be prominent in both the American Revolution and French Revolution was the rise of the printing press, and thus newspapers.
American Founder and key figure in the American Revolution, Benjamin Franklin, was part of a printing press, and famously wrote his complaints of the tyrannical British empire as a commentator in various newspapers, including under a female pseudonym, ‘Silence Dogood’. He liked aliases, on account of using a real name tends to get you killed.
We already have presses, however. Innumerable ones. So the formula isn’t simply the existence of said presses, but what they say. And what they don’t.
The public’s outrage can be manufactured and directed by perpetual screaming of the media; yesterday, Ukraine where a bout of Ukrainian flag waving broke out, today Palestine and Israel where a bout of Palestinian and Israeli flag waving broke out; before that perpetual screaming about viruses and masks.
Even now, supposed free minds are worshipping an Argentine politician simply because the media told them so. ‘He says he hates leftists’, ah, the only qualifier; empty, meaningless words. He says! He says! It is always about the words with you folks, never the actions!
Leaders Fear Angry Newspapers
Feared military leader Napolean Bonaparte who conquested much of Europe before his downfall famously wrote:
Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.
Showing even military generals of great power fear critical newspapers.
The problem is, current day newspapers — Substacks, if you will — are distinctly non-hostile. Dry, statistical analysis perpetuates the ranks with subdued ‘anger’ out of fear of tyrannical censorship.
The kind of hostilty Napolean Bonparte refers to were the kind calling for the guillotine and for French revolutionary forces to take arms and overthrow the monarchy. Perpetual calls to violence and arms
Not ‘oh dear old chap, your methodology looks a bit bunk’. Of course it’s bunk, they’re propagandists. Why are we trying to ‘refute’ them anyway? We know they’re lying. They know they’re lying. Why are we even trying to pretend there’s any sort of civil discourse to be had? They kill children. They’ll keep doing it until they’re forcefully stopped.
Pro-vaccine deluded cultists can cry out for the killing of the unvaccinated and remain distinctly unjailed; heck, even wantonly promoted in national papers (see above image), but if vaccine critical proponents cried for the killing of the vaccine proponents, say unqualified animal vet Albert Bourla, even with evidence he is mass murdering children, they can expect to get the full force of the jackboot.
We shouldn’t even attempt a general strike. Our children are too dumb to make nuclear reactors. We couldn’t possibly conceive smarter strategies than the globalists who commit arson or cut trees to protect the environment.
We must fear the US military, defeated supposedly by goatherders in Afghanistan and rice paddy farmers in Vietnam and impoverished North Koreans. The globalists supposedly fly by magic, require no food, breathe no air, and live in a pocket dimension making them untouchable.
Are We Our Own Worst Enemies?
We ought to cower in fear then, of the Terms of Service! Let us sacrifice our children on the altar of silence, worship inane, useless, do-nothing, talk-a-lot politicians with bad hairstyles presented to us by the media to consume, and when they invariably turn out to be cowardly ConOps, submit to the next round of gulags with our ‘passive resistance’ (read: sit around doing nothing) whilst mewing about mere legal repeals and not fully fledged reprisals.
Perhaps we ought pray our enemies to death, send them ‘get unwell soon’ cards, vex them with virtual voodoo dolls, make curse dances around our Twitter totem pole, slap on yet another sticker, and go back to digital sleep.
After all, it is only our children. And elderly. And family. And friends.
Related Articles To Read
Scotland Conspires To Deny Unvaccinated Fertility Treatments
By Hook Or By Crook (breaking into your house to install spyware)
MP Elliot Colburn More Interested In This Wonky Paint Than Deaths
Found this informative? Bypass censorship and receive more for free!
Help improve The Daily Beagle’s reach?
What do you think, dear reader? Let us know in the comments.
J6 planned as a pre-planned public display to dissuade the most motivated patriots, set an example?
the DC gang IS scared, they live in fear behind a razor wired electric fence.
You write some great stuff. And, your consistent in your messaging, too. Very unusual. If you look around at many of the 'experts' we read on these substacks, being consistent (objectively) is almost unheard of.
Keep it up.