Lets see if the Pfizer shills who are trying to post unevidenced propaganda via sock accounts will cough up the stump fee if I change the comment section settings to 'paid'.
The "Charles Beaudry" sock was quite amusing because all their bio says is that they are a "Geologists". So good at geology there's more than one of them, amazing.
Well, that's the big question isn't it? Are they engineering something you might want to keep out of your DNA? Are they engineering in something they want like tractability, less IQ, infertility, more cancer prone? I mean anything that would make you more dependent on THEM? Or something to 'time' your life span, just like a Replicant in Blade Runner? Yeah. Kind of think they are. And the nano tech. What will happen in an huge EMP situation? A mass coronal ejection? Would that burn the tech out, kill the body of the person who has alot of it in them? I have a thousand questions, thought.. no answers though.
I notice your Substack is barely two weeks old (3rd June 2023).
"It is essential to not believe anything you hear unless it is backed by a huge amount of data proving it"
What is the scientific definition of a "huge amount"? Sounds subjective and unscientific. PhD in what? Can you prove your qualifications?
"Not all conspiricy theories"
Interesting typo.
Ah, the usual shill schtick of 'muh conspiracy theory', when unable to refute the evidence, claim it doesn't exist and scream conspiracy theory.
" Thousands of greedy people with vested interests are capable of terrible things but their motivation is usually money and power."
It's odd how you demand "huge amounts" of evidence, but then deal in vague generalisations about 'money' and 'power' without actually refuting the premise. So they want money and power, and? How does that disprove the evidence - from the pharmaceutical shills mouth - of plasmids in the mRNA shots?
"stupidity"
Ah, you're here to try to downplay culpability.
Goes out the window when it is obviously confirmed they already knew, admit they knew, and are fully aware of the consequences. Ignorance of law was never a valid legal defence anyway; as a judge remarks, 'it is the duty of every citizen to familiarise themselves of the law, not to ignore it and hope for the best'.
You can deny all you want- and claim - 'there's no evidence'. There is a boat load surfacing, more every day. Nano is in the jabs (some at least, though not all). They've (the Deep State MIC DARPA) been experimenting for years on it and synthetic bio. This was a great oppo for them to load up the jabs with the tech and see what is and is not tolerated, what causes death, what doesn't. After all no one in their right mind would volunteer if they KNEW about side effects up to and including sudden death, unless terrified of getting something else (eg the overblown Covid) would they? There is plenty of evidence of the gene therapy delivery mechanisms that result in incorporation into your DNA. Excess plasmid will help do it, yes? Well a day, there is at least one additional way the uptake to DNA can happen and that is through reverse transcriptase, as demonstrated in the liver cells. (I have read and read ALOT and this one is pretty well established as occurring.) If you don't want to believe the worst, don't. But most of us with eyes open wide not shut wide, can see the writing on the wall. You are wanted DEAD. Not alive. By the Bill Gates, Warren Buffets and others who believe too many people exist... (not really, we could if we took their monies away, probably feed, shelter and develop and carry the billions on earth. They just don't want to give up their monies and power... for the well being of ALL. No they want to maintain their positions wealth and power by killing off the rest of us. They haven't managed to tackle Africa, and you have to wonder if famine is what they plan to use there.. or if they plan to enslave the fecund Africans for body parts, young blood supply and the like. But sure as shooting they are wiping out North America, Europe and Australia with the jabs. Talk to me in 10 years when the Alzheimer's wave hits (prion disease from 24/7 production of spike in the body...)
Imagine claiming yourself a PhD and talking about hard data but then constantly misspelling 'governement' and 'conspiricy'. Kinda had a child school vibe to it.
What was the infamous saying?
'Mutton and illiteracy go together like sausages and mash'
"I am happy to debate the issues until the cows come home but if you start throwing around insults then you are simply proving your own stupidity!" - Robert
And this is ultimately what earned you your ban. I did not insult you. I asked questions how exactly a PhD could misspell the words "government" and "conspiracy". You then, hypocritically, decided to suggest I was stupid (all of your actions checked off on the vaccine shill bingo card, by the way, congratulations).
I asked for evidence of your claims. You could have calmly presented them. You didn't, all you did was concede the plasmid contamination was real, but then tried to lie and suggest pharmaceutical companies weren't trying to kill us, this is refuted by the fact that:
1) They know the shots are unsafe and acknowledge they are unsafe; Pfizer barely admit to the shots causing myocarditis (they still sell and promote the shots), AstraZeneca have suspended shots (but have not admitted culpability), Johnson & Johnson have ceased manufacturing (but have not admitted culpability)
3) There has been no recall of the shots despite overwhelming evidence of harms; many of the victims have not been compensated; none have been warned of the harms.
6) The Daily Beagle literally contains the litany of above evidence, and you didn't ask me to provide evidence for any claims specifically, just made vague contrarian generalisations 'no they're not killing people', trying to paint this comprehensive and well evidenced campaign of murder as nothing more than a coincidental accident that somehow spans over 200 countries, over 10 different companies, and coordinated government censorship campaigns over the harms amounting to billions. Your position is not evidence: that is propaganda via the use of rote repetition.
7) I have low tolerance of fraudulent hacks who can't "put up" evidence for their claims and then try to waste my time with ad hominems, hairsplits, and opinionated garbage. Go tell your IP logging pharmaceutical buddies to eat a dick.
THANK YOU X1000 for highlighting these SEC filings from Moderna and Biontech. I have also been raising awareness by quoting these SEC filings in my substack comments on various substacks.
How many people do you think would have absolutely refused these shots had they had the proper informed consent about what gene therapy is, and what the associated severe outcome risk really is?
Maybe 1/3 of us - so a few more than the 25 percent who said no oh hell no from the start. I think right now, the numbers are like only 20 percent never got even 1 jab. The rest had at least 1 jab. And didn't go back for more...
They didn't fuck up. They planned it that way. This is the problem, everyone says it was a 'mistake'. It is not, never was. It is planned extermination of humankind 1.0 aka mankind and the biosphere. To replace with ??? digital bio synthetic silicon based life not 'real' bio...
I don't think what they did was a 'mistake', which is why I will refer to them explicitly as poison shots (and very charitably, SARS-CoV-2 shots to the less informed).
However this article is meant to show to critics how much ground even the shills have conceded. They concede there are plasmids. They concede mRNA is classified as 'gene therapy' (nothing therapeutic about it; it is gene modification). They concede plasmids are deemed gene modification.
They are essentially calling the toxic shots gene modification shots in all but name, with flimsy, poorly worded, contradictory denials issued.
I agree. No one wants to open their eyes and see the truths out there. Eyes Wide Shut is a very good analogy. personally, I've no children to worry about, and I believe I'll be around 76 when the storm hits. I've had a decent life, and I'm going to say, Go with God to everyone, and hope I go with God. Because I reject what they plan for humanity. Absolutely. Without question, and it does not take faith to make this leap. Only intellect. Intellect will light you the way, faith only butresses it. We talk about AI becoming sentient. We should worry because the ones birthing it, programming it are very very sick indeed. So how would AI ever be good or beneficial? If humanity is sick at its core?
More great revelations 'they' don't want us to know! The purveyors of DEADLY INJECTIONS, they call 'vaccines', are becoming ruthlessly obvious with their lame attempts to cover up all down-sides to their useless but potentially life threatening, longevity impacting, INJECTIONS.
Never again will they be able to 'SELL' the next Viral attack as a natural event! Nor will we buy into their sinister 'pretend' restrictions designed to control us from our rightful freedom and independence.
Say NO to Gates's corrupted World Health Organisation's veiled attempt to steal reasonable international reaction to illnesses, whether they be Man-enhanced or not!
Lets see if the Pfizer shills who are trying to post unevidenced propaganda via sock accounts will cough up the stump fee if I change the comment section settings to 'paid'.
The "Charles Beaudry" sock was quite amusing because all their bio says is that they are a "Geologists". So good at geology there's more than one of them, amazing.
Well, that's the big question isn't it? Are they engineering something you might want to keep out of your DNA? Are they engineering in something they want like tractability, less IQ, infertility, more cancer prone? I mean anything that would make you more dependent on THEM? Or something to 'time' your life span, just like a Replicant in Blade Runner? Yeah. Kind of think they are. And the nano tech. What will happen in an huge EMP situation? A mass coronal ejection? Would that burn the tech out, kill the body of the person who has alot of it in them? I have a thousand questions, thought.. no answers though.
I hope to answer the question in due time.
Kevin McKernan sequenced a vial, but without an analysis of what the DNA does it's hard to say at this stage.
I notice your Substack is barely two weeks old (3rd June 2023).
"It is essential to not believe anything you hear unless it is backed by a huge amount of data proving it"
What is the scientific definition of a "huge amount"? Sounds subjective and unscientific. PhD in what? Can you prove your qualifications?
"Not all conspiricy theories"
Interesting typo.
Ah, the usual shill schtick of 'muh conspiracy theory', when unable to refute the evidence, claim it doesn't exist and scream conspiracy theory.
" Thousands of greedy people with vested interests are capable of terrible things but their motivation is usually money and power."
It's odd how you demand "huge amounts" of evidence, but then deal in vague generalisations about 'money' and 'power' without actually refuting the premise. So they want money and power, and? How does that disprove the evidence - from the pharmaceutical shills mouth - of plasmids in the mRNA shots?
"stupidity"
Ah, you're here to try to downplay culpability.
Goes out the window when it is obviously confirmed they already knew, admit they knew, and are fully aware of the consequences. Ignorance of law was never a valid legal defence anyway; as a judge remarks, 'it is the duty of every citizen to familiarise themselves of the law, not to ignore it and hope for the best'.
You can deny all you want- and claim - 'there's no evidence'. There is a boat load surfacing, more every day. Nano is in the jabs (some at least, though not all). They've (the Deep State MIC DARPA) been experimenting for years on it and synthetic bio. This was a great oppo for them to load up the jabs with the tech and see what is and is not tolerated, what causes death, what doesn't. After all no one in their right mind would volunteer if they KNEW about side effects up to and including sudden death, unless terrified of getting something else (eg the overblown Covid) would they? There is plenty of evidence of the gene therapy delivery mechanisms that result in incorporation into your DNA. Excess plasmid will help do it, yes? Well a day, there is at least one additional way the uptake to DNA can happen and that is through reverse transcriptase, as demonstrated in the liver cells. (I have read and read ALOT and this one is pretty well established as occurring.) If you don't want to believe the worst, don't. But most of us with eyes open wide not shut wide, can see the writing on the wall. You are wanted DEAD. Not alive. By the Bill Gates, Warren Buffets and others who believe too many people exist... (not really, we could if we took their monies away, probably feed, shelter and develop and carry the billions on earth. They just don't want to give up their monies and power... for the well being of ALL. No they want to maintain their positions wealth and power by killing off the rest of us. They haven't managed to tackle Africa, and you have to wonder if famine is what they plan to use there.. or if they plan to enslave the fecund Africans for body parts, young blood supply and the like. But sure as shooting they are wiping out North America, Europe and Australia with the jabs. Talk to me in 10 years when the Alzheimer's wave hits (prion disease from 24/7 production of spike in the body...)
Imagine claiming yourself a PhD and talking about hard data but then constantly misspelling 'governement' and 'conspiricy'. Kinda had a child school vibe to it.
What was the infamous saying?
'Mutton and illiteracy go together like sausages and mash'
Time limit is 24 hours.
So don't think you can ignore the challenge and go silent.
"I deal in hard data."
You haven't presented any, and the fact you're blatantly spreading lies is strongly inclining me to removing your misinformation.
"Whether it is spread by the governement or by conspiricy theorists"
What's interesting is you can't spell either government or conspiracy, and have used the same misspelling twice.
"Show me the data and I will change my mind."
The data has been shown.
So, ultimatum: put up your evidence refuting it or receive a ban for spreading misinformation.
"I am happy to debate the issues until the cows come home but if you start throwing around insults then you are simply proving your own stupidity!" - Robert
And this is ultimately what earned you your ban. I did not insult you. I asked questions how exactly a PhD could misspell the words "government" and "conspiracy". You then, hypocritically, decided to suggest I was stupid (all of your actions checked off on the vaccine shill bingo card, by the way, congratulations).
I asked for evidence of your claims. You could have calmly presented them. You didn't, all you did was concede the plasmid contamination was real, but then tried to lie and suggest pharmaceutical companies weren't trying to kill us, this is refuted by the fact that:
1) They know the shots are unsafe and acknowledge they are unsafe; Pfizer barely admit to the shots causing myocarditis (they still sell and promote the shots), AstraZeneca have suspended shots (but have not admitted culpability), Johnson & Johnson have ceased manufacturing (but have not admitted culpability)
2) The risk-benefit clearly kills children; the FDA admit to the myocarditis harms (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/proving-the-mrna-shots-harm-children), the UK's ICU admit to AstraZeneca causing VITT (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/proving-astrazeneca-vaccines-kill): *they continue to push the shots despite knowing they kill and maim*
3) There has been no recall of the shots despite overwhelming evidence of harms; many of the victims have not been compensated; none have been warned of the harms.
4) The pharmaceutical companies knew of the risks back pre-2021 (see the EMA leaks I've been covering: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/ema-leaks-acceptability-criteria) and they covered it up.
5) The pharmaceutical companies gave fraudulent datasets to fake 'safety' (mouse images [https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/pfizer-skips-leg-day-on-mouse-malarkey], Western blots [https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/ema-leaks-trial-site-news-finds-pfizer], maladjusted clinical trials/racism/mis-filing of injuries [https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/pfizer-trial-uses-racism-to-cover], etc)
6) The Daily Beagle literally contains the litany of above evidence, and you didn't ask me to provide evidence for any claims specifically, just made vague contrarian generalisations 'no they're not killing people', trying to paint this comprehensive and well evidenced campaign of murder as nothing more than a coincidental accident that somehow spans over 200 countries, over 10 different companies, and coordinated government censorship campaigns over the harms amounting to billions. Your position is not evidence: that is propaganda via the use of rote repetition.
7) I have low tolerance of fraudulent hacks who can't "put up" evidence for their claims and then try to waste my time with ad hominems, hairsplits, and opinionated garbage. Go tell your IP logging pharmaceutical buddies to eat a dick.
No mad insults. Banned for ban evasion. Have a nice day.
THANK YOU X1000 for highlighting these SEC filings from Moderna and Biontech. I have also been raising awareness by quoting these SEC filings in my substack comments on various substacks.
How many people do you think would have absolutely refused these shots had they had the proper informed consent about what gene therapy is, and what the associated severe outcome risk really is?
Maybe 1/3 of us - so a few more than the 25 percent who said no oh hell no from the start. I think right now, the numbers are like only 20 percent never got even 1 jab. The rest had at least 1 jab. And didn't go back for more...
If it's spread by bacteria, who did or did not get the jab will quickly become irrelevant.
E. Coli is surprisingly good at horizontal gene transfer. Including to other types of bacteria.
They fucked up when they released this.
They didn't fuck up. They planned it that way. This is the problem, everyone says it was a 'mistake'. It is not, never was. It is planned extermination of humankind 1.0 aka mankind and the biosphere. To replace with ??? digital bio synthetic silicon based life not 'real' bio...
I don't think what they did was a 'mistake', which is why I will refer to them explicitly as poison shots (and very charitably, SARS-CoV-2 shots to the less informed).
However this article is meant to show to critics how much ground even the shills have conceded. They concede there are plasmids. They concede mRNA is classified as 'gene therapy' (nothing therapeutic about it; it is gene modification). They concede plasmids are deemed gene modification.
They are essentially calling the toxic shots gene modification shots in all but name, with flimsy, poorly worded, contradictory denials issued.
I agree. No one wants to open their eyes and see the truths out there. Eyes Wide Shut is a very good analogy. personally, I've no children to worry about, and I believe I'll be around 76 when the storm hits. I've had a decent life, and I'm going to say, Go with God to everyone, and hope I go with God. Because I reject what they plan for humanity. Absolutely. Without question, and it does not take faith to make this leap. Only intellect. Intellect will light you the way, faith only butresses it. We talk about AI becoming sentient. We should worry because the ones birthing it, programming it are very very sick indeed. So how would AI ever be good or beneficial? If humanity is sick at its core?
More great revelations 'they' don't want us to know! The purveyors of DEADLY INJECTIONS, they call 'vaccines', are becoming ruthlessly obvious with their lame attempts to cover up all down-sides to their useless but potentially life threatening, longevity impacting, INJECTIONS.
Never again will they be able to 'SELL' the next Viral attack as a natural event! Nor will we buy into their sinister 'pretend' restrictions designed to control us from our rightful freedom and independence.
Say NO to Gates's corrupted World Health Organisation's veiled attempt to steal reasonable international reaction to illnesses, whether they be Man-enhanced or not!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!