BMJ Accuses FDA, CDC Of Secret VAERS Database
It seems The Daily Beagle did see behind the veil after all
Lead originally posted by Jonathan Engler…
…The BMJ (British Medical Journal) has found the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) have two VAERS databases, a public and a private database:
Long time readers of The Daily Beagle might not be surprised by this, although skeptics might be. We previously published how VAERS accidentally gave The Daily Beagle a rare and unique insight into what appeared to be the true numbers for SARS-CoV-2 shot harms. A recap:
Deaths
2,040,914 rows for deaths (a person can only die once).
Permanent Disabilities
153,861 rows for permanent disabilites.
Life Threatening Conditions
209,761.
Hospitalized and Emergency Room (AKA ‘Hospital Visits’)
Some Emergency Room visits will result in being hospitalised (interred) at the hospital (as opposed to discharged and sent back home).
1,271,829 rows.
Hospitalized Only
People admitted to hospital: 737,680 rows.
Emergency Room Only
924,142 rows.
Hospitalized Or Emergency Room Discrepency
Note that there is a seeming discrepency with the above figures: Hospitalized Only (737,680) + Emergency Room Only (924,142) comes to 1,661,822, not ‘1,271,829’ as shown under ‘Hospitalized and Emergency Room’.
This is likely due to a person both going to an Emergency Room and then getting Hospitalised (interred) rather than discharged (so a double-count in some cases; one for ER, one for hospitalised).
This might seem counter-intuitive to some people as they will consider the Emergency Room as part of a hospital, but hospitalisation typically involves being admitted to a ward.
An Emergency Room is usually for assessments prior to admittance; if ER assesses you as not requiring hospitalisation, you get discharged and don’t get hospitalised.
We Couldn’t Replicate The Above Results… Now We Know Why
The numbers were so explosive that The Daily Beagle planned to record video evidence from end-to-end of the VAERS datasets, except we couldn’t replicate the results.
We even tried testing things like adding all vaccine deaths from all vaccines together from all time only to find it fell majorly short of the 2 million rows mark (a mere 25k). It wasn’t an accidental miscalculation.
We suspect we somehow got shown the real VAERS database by the CDC. Now we have the BMJ on record declaring the FDA and CDC use a private, hidden VAERS database containing real death counts, it seems like The Daily Beagle did indeed see the true results.
That means at time of print of our original article back in Jan 2023, at least over 2 million people died from the SARS-CoV-2 shots. Our article even uses UK excess death calculations as a projection to demonstrate 2 million deaths not only is plausible, but below the projected casualty rates.
In that article we asked:
So Dear Reader, Did The Daily Beagle see beyond the veil? Are the CDC committing fraud? And how should the matter be addressed?
And the answers are: Yes, yes, and by being exposed by the BMJ.
You heard it here first folks. We saw beyond the veil.
Related Articles To Read
Found this informative? Receive more for free!
Help improve The Daily Beagle’s reach?
What do you think, dear reader? Let us know in the comments.
This could lead to potentially the biggest scoop in the history of reporting - that millions of people have secretly died in each and every nation via COVID shot and covered up by fake weekly mortality figures. Is it true?
A lot of people saw my article on new evidence of 160,000 + missing Yellow Cards. It was explosive:
https://open.substack.com/pub/feldmans/p/are-the-mhra-releasing-all-of-their?r=xwknv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The conclusion I drew there was that the reduced injury reporting for the boosters may be doctored and therefore the vaccines continue their trend of a rising severity of reactions per shot, admitted by Pfizer and Moderna for dose 2.
Data may be doctored in other nations as well such as in the US. This guy has painstakingly been gathering evidence for several years now. I recommend him for anything on VAERS cover ups (although you prob are aware!).
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/
I do have concerns about the ONS weekly mortality data. You know that bar graph release every Tuesday showing how many people were registered to have died in a given week? I swear I saw several times that the latest bar was revised downwards after a few days. This shouldn't happen for registered deaths unless their was a series of mistakes. It can only go up as missing data sets are added. I can't remember the guy, is it Mike Austin who covers this? I need to talk with him! I wish I had saved the pages as they were released, I didn't!!
I'm probably quite skeptical that millions have really died in a nation the size of the UK but I ask myself this question, what is the maximum number of people that could disappear without us really noticing?
Thanks for this fascinating (and disturbing) post.
Wow! No words!!