Discussion: Did The Daily Beagle Accidentally See Behind The Veil On Vaccine Deaths?

Unable to replicate these results on VAERS, but screenshots and UK data add weight

The Gateway Pundit published this compelling and saddening image of posters of those killed by the vaccine, plastered outside the BBC, by grieving, bereaved families calling out the BBC for their lies. Even the BBC’s own have died by this hand.

Source: @allanweir on TikTok

At this point, the evidence for the massacre is everywhere and overwhelming. News reporting ‘1,000 excess deaths a week’ in the UK (that would be 52 thousand per year; 52 weeks in a year) whilst trying to blame it on the ‘NHS buckling’, even though the NHS has always been ‘buckling’ for decades.

Meanwhile the UK government signals it knows it is to do with heart attacks, with plans to cover up the vaccine deaths by offering Statins en-mass. A Statin is a cholesterol lowering drug, used to regulate blood pressure.

Given these cardiac arrest deaths aren’t caused by cholesterol, they won’t do anything. Simply theatre, to make it seem like the government cares. If they really cared they’d tell you the truth.

What Is The Truth, Anyway?

During research over specific accident statistics, The Daily Beagle visited the VAERS dataset to see if comparisons and trends could be spotted. We selected COVID19 and COVID19-2 shots, sorted by vaccine manufacturer and VAERS ID, and restricted the report range to 2020-2022.

VAERS has an “event category” on the form:

So The Daily Beagle figured we’d go through the list, picking only one category at a time, and only the event categories likely to be directly related to serious vaccine outcomes. Individually, we only picked: Death, Life Threatening, Permanent Disability, Hospitalized, and Emergency Room.

We also did both Hospitalisation and Emergency Room together as a representation of hospital visits.

Understanding VAERS Design Flaw

There’s an intentional design flaw in VAERS where they intentionally limit how many results you get to a mere 10,000, and just report a row count for anything above that. CDC doesn’t want you getting anything damning.

The Daily Beagle used this fact to get totals for each section in the Events Category, to work out a total of how many deaths, permanent disabilities, hospitalisations there are.

As the VAERS form is massive (bigger than the available screen space we could screenshot), and this was only intended to be preliminary research for a later, in-depth write up for an article, we only took screenshots of the row totals, with plans to make a video showing the step-by-step process later.

We can no longer repeat what we got following the steps we used.

The numbers we got back were huge.

The Numbers (That We Can’t Get From VAERS Now)

Deaths

We got back 2,040,914 rows (that would be individual entries, IE over 2 million deaths).

Permanent Disabilities

153,861 rows (or entries).

Life Threatening Conditions

209,761 rows.

Hospitalized and Emergency Room (AKA ‘Hospital Visits’)

Note there is some overlap; some Emergency Room visits will result in being hospitalised (interred) at the hospital. So what this count represents is the number of people who visited hospital regardless of outcome: 1,271,829 rows.

Hospitalized only

For people who were admitted to a ward or hospital treatment (not necessarily via Emergency Room). 737,680 rows.

Emergency Room only

People who visited the Emergency Room. Not all Emergency Room visits result in hospitalisation (being interred), some may be sent home with treatment.

924,142 rows.

Huge and damning figures for the COVID-19 shots, right?

Except We Can No Longer Replicate These Results (In VAERS)

We returned to shoot a video to show the steps to replicate these given counts. Such large numbers require evidence of high calibre — so a video showing the step-by-step process would be suitable.

Except, now when we do the COVID19 + COVID19-2 death results, we get back a mere 13k rows. Or 14k. Or 15k. It suspiciously changes despite searching the same area. But never does it show the 2 million rows we once had despite following the same steps.

As a result, this is presented purely on trust, which admittedly is the worst form of evidence, but how would someone explain how we got such large, distinct numbers? We don’t even know how.

How Could It Be Possible?

There’s only a handful of possible arguments, either:

1. The Daily Beagle has committed fraud

2. The Daily Beagle has committed a mistake

3. The CDC has committed a mistake

4. The CDC has committed fraud

The Daily Beagle Committed Fraud?

If it was The Daily Beagle committing fraud, why would we report it doesn’t match the current CDC numbers and still shoot a video? Why bother with several row counts? Why even take screenshots?

It’s not even clear how we would get VAERS to return such high numbers, or why they would change so drastically between categories, or even over time.

The Daily Beagle Committed A Mistake?

What possible genuine mistake could we commit on such a form that would allow us to select only COVID19 and COVID19-2 shots but then get millions of returns under the death category?

As the video demonstrates at the 3 minute mark onwards, you cannot accidentally select both ‘all’ and a specific subset. Even if you were to choose all vaccines, all reports ever, the VAERS form laughably claims there’s only about 25k deaths from vaccines over the last 40 years.

This is frankly absurdly low given the 50k excess deaths in the UK alone, the size of just one US State.

CDC Has Made A Mistake?

If the CDC has committed a mistake, why has this large number phenomena never occurred before, and why would the mistake only show itself to The Daily Beagle and no-one else?

Why does their form give inconsistent death results even within the COVID-19 category in the renewed search? They must be aware of the issues, right?

CDC Has Committed Fraud?

Curiously we will note that the timing of this discrepancy coincides with the CDC’s ‘investigation’ that COVID-19 bivalent poison shots cause stroke.

We wonder if perhaps they temporarily enabled the real figures during their own ‘investigatory’ cover-up and The Daily Beagle was there by sheer luck during the window conducting our own research.

We find the idea of 2 million deaths and 1.2 million hospital visits to be a much more believable figure than the ones being proclaimed by the CDC currently. Plus we know the pharmaceutical industry pays large sums of money to silence the truth.

Can We Prove It?

We can replicate similar results, but by using non-VAERS datasets and inference. Not as strong as seeing the original, but you’d agree extremely compelling, and more compelling than just taking us at our word.

If we take the UK’s 50k excess death figures, and we treat the UK as akin to a US State, and treat the figure as an average — basically, we multiply the UK figures (50,000) by the number of US States (50) — we see this:

That’s right. 2.5 million deaths.

Obviously we haven’t included ‘all US territories’ like the VAERS dataset, so Washington DC isn’t part of that count, nor Puerto Rico, or other island territories. So this is likely an undercount.

Now we would anticipate some underreporting factor on VAERS, as well as variations between States (poison shot uptake, healthcare intervention, pre-existing health), which explains why we only saw roughly 2 million rather than 2.5 million.

But it does seem like what we saw on VAERS originally of more than 2 million deaths jives with the other datasets we already have.

So Dear Reader, Did The Daily Beagle see beyond the veil? Are the CDC committing fraud? And how should the matter be addressed? Leave a comment below.

---

Financially Support The Daily Beagle For More Chance Discoveries Like This!

Or share with others so they can learn?