This could lead to potentially the biggest scoop in the history of reporting - that millions of people have secretly died in each and every nation via COVID shot and covered up by fake weekly mortality figures. Is it true?
A lot of people saw my article on new evidence of 160,000 + missing Yellow Cards. It was explosive:
The conclusion I drew there was that the reduced injury reporting for the boosters may be doctored and therefore the vaccines continue their trend of a rising severity of reactions per shot, admitted by Pfizer and Moderna for dose 2.
Data may be doctored in other nations as well such as in the US. This guy has painstakingly been gathering evidence for several years now. I recommend him for anything on VAERS cover ups (although you prob are aware!).
I do have concerns about the ONS weekly mortality data. You know that bar graph release every Tuesday showing how many people were registered to have died in a given week? I swear I saw several times that the latest bar was revised downwards after a few days. This shouldn't happen for registered deaths unless their was a series of mistakes. It can only go up as missing data sets are added. I can't remember the guy, is it Mike Austin who covers this? I need to talk with him! I wish I had saved the pages as they were released, I didn't!!
I'm probably quite skeptical that millions have really died in a nation the size of the UK but I ask myself this question, what is the maximum number of people that could disappear without us really noticing?
Thanks for this fascinating (and disturbing) post.
"I swear I saw several times that the latest bar was revised downwards after a few days."
ONS have a lot of history of fudging data statistics, and struggled to answer basic questions. ONS however handle UK data. VAERS is for the CDC which is the US.
"I'm probably quite skeptical that millions have really died in a nation the size of the UK"
The data isn't for the UK (United Kingdom), VAERS is for the US (United States). I used the UK excess deaths as a projection baseline given the US doesn't have much useable data, essentially emulating the UK as a single US state (given geographical size and resources; the size is on par with Florida). I then multiplied the UK's 50k deaths by the 50 US states to give the rough 2.5 mil figure for the US.
It isn't strictly proof; it is to show that 2 million dying in the US under excess deaths (read: caused by the shots) is entirely plausible.
Nov 10, 2023·edited Nov 10, 2023Liked by The Underdog
Yeah no worries, I understood what you was trying to do, thanks for helping. I'm from the UK hence the UK angle here, sorry didn't mean to confuse. However of interest, UK Yellow Card reports actually did make VAERS and can be found in their wayback machine, but you have to use medalerts if you ever wish to research that route.
The known extent of the global deception is very shaky at the moment and their could be more shocking news on the way.
I am not familiar with the DoD database (I presume you mean DMED?). My suspicion is it was actively tampered with, but frankly I consider anything that comes out of the military to be propaganda.
So in 2022 when vaccine skeptics compared the percentages of various known adverse effects of the vaccines from 2021 DMED Data to the 2016-2019 averages, showing many 200-300% increases, the military says that the 2016-2019 was wrong and took the system offline to correct the data, saying that only a fraction of the cases from 2016-2018 were posted to DMED and they were correcting the DMED by adding the missing information. Just discovered 4 wrong years at this moment in time; nothing to see here.
BMJ has taken a long time - on the order of decades - to move across the aisle. They used to host hitpieces by the medically unqualified Brian Deer against victims of the vaccines. These days they're taking a much more critical stance of the corporations.
And yes, there are overwhelming number of flaws with VAERS beyond the obvious two-faced system. 1.7 million reports to me seems like an 'undersell' given you can clearly see I got over 2 million rows back in early 2023!
The USA (330 million) has about six times the population of the United Kingdom (56,500,000). So 50,000 UK deaths would parallel 292,000 deaths in the USA.
That's an alternative way, however VAERS covers territories that aren't States that fall under the jurisdiction of the US but aren't counted as States (Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Diego Garcia, Gaum, ex-pats, US military bases overseas...).
I forgot about that. VAERS also allows international entries, but I am not sure when they are included and excluded. There are reports of Canadians and Australians making VAERS reports just to create a permanent record of their injury somewhere.
I restricted my search results to the relevant 50 States. So the 2 mil figure is only for the 50 States. Trying to calculate ex-pat is a mess not even I'd want to touch.
This could lead to potentially the biggest scoop in the history of reporting - that millions of people have secretly died in each and every nation via COVID shot and covered up by fake weekly mortality figures. Is it true?
A lot of people saw my article on new evidence of 160,000 + missing Yellow Cards. It was explosive:
https://open.substack.com/pub/feldmans/p/are-the-mhra-releasing-all-of-their?r=xwknv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The conclusion I drew there was that the reduced injury reporting for the boosters may be doctored and therefore the vaccines continue their trend of a rising severity of reactions per shot, admitted by Pfizer and Moderna for dose 2.
Data may be doctored in other nations as well such as in the US. This guy has painstakingly been gathering evidence for several years now. I recommend him for anything on VAERS cover ups (although you prob are aware!).
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/
I do have concerns about the ONS weekly mortality data. You know that bar graph release every Tuesday showing how many people were registered to have died in a given week? I swear I saw several times that the latest bar was revised downwards after a few days. This shouldn't happen for registered deaths unless their was a series of mistakes. It can only go up as missing data sets are added. I can't remember the guy, is it Mike Austin who covers this? I need to talk with him! I wish I had saved the pages as they were released, I didn't!!
I'm probably quite skeptical that millions have really died in a nation the size of the UK but I ask myself this question, what is the maximum number of people that could disappear without us really noticing?
Thanks for this fascinating (and disturbing) post.
"I swear I saw several times that the latest bar was revised downwards after a few days."
ONS have a lot of history of fudging data statistics, and struggled to answer basic questions. ONS however handle UK data. VAERS is for the CDC which is the US.
"I'm probably quite skeptical that millions have really died in a nation the size of the UK"
The data isn't for the UK (United Kingdom), VAERS is for the US (United States). I used the UK excess deaths as a projection baseline given the US doesn't have much useable data, essentially emulating the UK as a single US state (given geographical size and resources; the size is on par with Florida). I then multiplied the UK's 50k deaths by the 50 US states to give the rough 2.5 mil figure for the US.
It isn't strictly proof; it is to show that 2 million dying in the US under excess deaths (read: caused by the shots) is entirely plausible.
Yeah no worries, I understood what you was trying to do, thanks for helping. I'm from the UK hence the UK angle here, sorry didn't mean to confuse. However of interest, UK Yellow Card reports actually did make VAERS and can be found in their wayback machine, but you have to use medalerts if you ever wish to research that route.
The known extent of the global deception is very shaky at the moment and their could be more shocking news on the way.
Wow! No words!!
Wow, great job, thank you!
This existence of the #2 VAERS will probably become public knowledge in the near future.
All it will take is for Rand Paul or Senator Johnson to ask the right questions to a senior CDC official under oath.
Of course, that assumes they really want the answers....
There's also a question of: is the private VAERS subject to FOIA?
Only unless it can remain hidden by some FOI Act clause like "national security" etc
Politicians can review classified material.
As for privacy, redactions exist, anonymisation of the information is a thing (it is why we already have access to some VAERS information).
They can't redact the total numbers, though, or the counts; tampering with the datasets and misreporting would be fraud.
Like what happened to the DoD database from 2016-2019?
I am not familiar with the DoD database (I presume you mean DMED?). My suspicion is it was actively tampered with, but frankly I consider anything that comes out of the military to be propaganda.
Here is the biased fact check from Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-militarydatabase-error-idUSL1N2UY1S2
So in 2022 when vaccine skeptics compared the percentages of various known adverse effects of the vaccines from 2021 DMED Data to the 2016-2019 averages, showing many 200-300% increases, the military says that the 2016-2019 was wrong and took the system offline to correct the data, saying that only a fraction of the cases from 2016-2018 were posted to DMED and they were correcting the DMED by adding the missing information. Just discovered 4 wrong years at this moment in time; nothing to see here.
You will want to read my observations. God Bless BMJ, but they are late to the party!
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/the-bmj-investigates-the-broken-system
BMJ has taken a long time - on the order of decades - to move across the aisle. They used to host hitpieces by the medically unqualified Brian Deer against victims of the vaccines. These days they're taking a much more critical stance of the corporations.
And yes, there are overwhelming number of flaws with VAERS beyond the obvious two-faced system. 1.7 million reports to me seems like an 'undersell' given you can clearly see I got over 2 million rows back in early 2023!
The USA (330 million) has about six times the population of the United Kingdom (56,500,000). So 50,000 UK deaths would parallel 292,000 deaths in the USA.
That's an alternative way, however VAERS covers territories that aren't States that fall under the jurisdiction of the US but aren't counted as States (Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Diego Garcia, Gaum, ex-pats, US military bases overseas...).
Good point.
I forgot about that. VAERS also allows international entries, but I am not sure when they are included and excluded. There are reports of Canadians and Australians making VAERS reports just to create a permanent record of their injury somewhere.
"VAERS also allows international entries"
I restricted my search results to the relevant 50 States. So the 2 mil figure is only for the 50 States. Trying to calculate ex-pat is a mess not even I'd want to touch.
remember that 17 million number? https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/study-17-million-dead-from-the-mrna
seems it may be an underestimate!
Long live Ed Dowd! Long live Daniel Rancourt!
see how the various actors try to get to the top of the dogpile....all loathsome...