"Then Delete Your Account" - Elon Musk
Elon Mask wants your facial recognition mask as spat over block grows
Delete For Free Speech
James Woods had levelled a criticism at Elon Musk over his plans to destroy the block feature on Twitter, given James Woods has experienced coordinated harassment attacks on Twitter from 30 trolls previously (to the point of litigation with said trolls).
Elon Musk gave him the proverbial ‘go fuck yourself’ and told him to delete his account.
This is particularly fresh given how much fretting Elon Musk did previously about people tracking his private jet in real time; he banned elonjet, if you recall, despite lying and saying he wouldn’t.
Canadian Lawyer and well known YouTuber Viva Frei was so shocked by Elon Musk’s brash attitude telling James Woods to ‘delete their account’ that he refused to believe it was Elon Musk himself:
Saying Elon Musk is being run by an impersonator is a great ‘copium’ tactic, except Elon Musk implemented a ban on Elon Musk impersonators who don’t clearly mark themselves as parody, as you recall.
So this would mean any unmarked “impersonation” would be done with Elon Musk’s consent, I.E. a deception he approves of.
The Daily Beagle has been quite vocal in highlighting examples of “Elon Mask” clearly acting as controlled opposition (ConOp). For example, Elon claimed to be critical and suspicious of the shots, but did you know Tesla manufactures mRNA for CureVac?
He didn’t highlight that ‘in bed with the shot sellers’ so vocally. Then there was the time he mass banned Substack. Only after massive backlash did he allow the links to be posted, but not embed (embedding is where the thumbnail image appears, and it improves click-through rates). Rules for thee on blocking.
Viva is being charitably kind to Elon, but Elon has a clear trend of authoritarianism and power-tripping, even ‘suspending’ (banning) those who point out Twitter is a giant information honeypot. The title of the article? “Criticise Musk's Plans, Get Suspended”. James Woods had a close run-in.
The criticism that got the account suspended? Pointing out Twitter is a giant honey pot.
Twitter Plans To Sell Your Data To Facial Recognition Intel Agency Firm
PC Magazine published an article declaring Twitter will have users submit a ‘selfie’ along with a ‘government issued ID’, so they can share it with AU10TIX. Twitter frantically rushed out to “fact check” it as ‘optional’:
‘Optional’, like the shots were ‘optional’; either quit your job or get your shot. Either delete your account or accept the changes. The “factcheck” cited an unheard of website suspiciously called “socialmediatoday” as ‘evidence’:
Even if we take the “factcheck” as face value; Twitter will simply deboost non-Blue users (remember the post count restrictions?) to the point of zero reach. The message from the globalists? Submit to digital surveillance and control or no-one will see your posts.
This mirrors The Daily Beagle’s tongue-in-cheek prediction on Elon Musk’s ConOp perfectly. We even guessed the future name correctly (this was written last year):
AU10TIX Are Part Of A Facial Recognition Mass Surveillance Company
AU10TIX are a subsidiary of ICTS International N.V. (N.V. indicates it is a Netherlands registered company, however they’re operated out of Israel).
AU10TIX are partnered with pro-vaccine Microsoft, no doubt so the two pro-mass surveillance companies can pool their surveillance data together:
AU10TIX makes use of AI for ‘KYC’ (Know Your Customer). KYC is an ID verification requirement for ‘anti-money laundering’, however KYC does not require facial recognition nor the use of AI:
AU10TIX are partnered with Thomson Reuters (the same Thomson Reuters with ties to Pfizer).
The Thomson Reuters article has a thumbnail image hinting at facial recognition (the facial mapping mask and face box identifier), but the article itself mysteriously doesn’t mention the words and only talks about ‘synthetic identities’ (read: fake images):
That’s fine, though, as AU10TIX in their blog talk about facial recognition based on AI machine learning…
…Hang around on their web page long enough, and it will pop-up a claim it is a “fully automated Identity Verification solution”…
…this is on an article that mentions “Selfie-to-ID face matching” (read: facial recognition performed on your ‘selfie’)…
Sounds bad? Gets worse.
Connected To An Intel Agency Firm
AU10TIX’s parent company, ICTS International N.V. was established in 1982 by former agents of Shin Bet and former El Al airline security agents:
They also have ties to the Dutch government (in a revolving door job, they set the airport security guidelines, which no doubt favours their own business model):
They operate airport screening services, beside other surveillance and datamining services. Airport checkpoints, travel documents, X-ray machines, etc). Yes, exactly the kind of airport people you’re thinking of.
And yes, it does also include American airports. At the bottom of the ICTS International N.V. holdings page, are ICTS’ holdings (subsidaries; connected companies) listed, including Huntleigh USA:
Huntleigh USA’s page declares it deals with airport security, including ‘baggage handling’:
I-SEC operate airport security in mostly European countries. ICTS datamine and profile airline passengers Minority-Report style to assess how much of a threat they are:
You can bet the Farm it will be used to profile and assess Twitter users for their level of threat as well, as The Daily Beagle predicted.
Delete your account: probably the best-worst advice for a data mass surveillance company imaginable.
Summary
James Woods complained he needed Twitter's block function to deal with stalkers he's litigating. Elon Musk, who hates impersonation and stalking, and has banned stalkers before, told Woods to delete his account. Viva Frei refused to believe this was Elon. The Daily Beagle provided prior examples of Elon Musk acting two-faced.
Twitter is using an Israel intel agency connected firm called AU10TIX, known to profile airline passengers for 'threat level', to datamine selfies using AI facial recognition for Twitter Blue verification.
Twitter 'factcheck' claimed it was optional, but Twitter plans to deboost non-Blue accounts, effectively coercing them into giving away ID, confirming a prediction by The Daily Beagle that Twitter would be used to identify "threats" to the government's regime. One account was suspended already for making the "honeypot" observation.Join Gab.com if you haven’t already; speech is open, block functions work, and no selfies required.
Found this informative? Receive more for free!
Raise awareness?
What do you think, dear reader?
Addendum (loose notes that didn't fit neatly anywhere):
Twitter also requires users sign a 30-day holding period consent form with AU10TIX. This is likely to align with US law enforcement requirements, which requires US service providers hold potentially incriminating data for 30 days minimum. Whilst wholly US based companies can do this without asking for consent, the consent form is likely so they can meet European GDPR compliance rules (which require consent on data collection).
This implies Twitter intends to fully comply with any and all law enforcement requests to hand over your data - including ID, selfies, facial recognition data and threat profile. It wasn't added to the article because it is speculation on intentions (which is worthless reporting in this day and age), however it is a point worth discussing; do they plan to share your facial recognition data with the US government?
Another question to ask yourself is: why are they hosting data in an Israeli company, rather than a US based company, if Twitter plans to be an 'American hosted service' (to avoid EU censorship issues)? Similarly, why not a European based organisation if it's for compliance with European laws? The very odd jurisdiction selection with a known intel agency tied firm raises eyebrows.
EU and US have no enforcement jurisdiction over Israel, so if they sell off your data to third party firms or datamine it... you will have great difficulty proving it is even happening, and will have even greater difficulty litigating against it given the jurisdictional complexities if they misuse your data, which odds are, they will.
It isn't to bypass censorship, as this Israeli company is tied in with Europe itself (via the Netherlands), and ergo, likely tied into EU GDPR rules (and thus, EU laws on censorship). The EU probably won't care what they do with your data, so long as censorship is a thing.
(If Elon was aiming for censorship immunity he could have just routed payments through either Iceland or one of the endless tax havens found around the planet.)
First take a selfie. Then stand in one fixed leg for 4 minutes and 13 seconds, then do 3 pirouettes.
Then to hear your voice, say the warm water recipe 7 times. Make sure it is not a recipe for hot water. Then blow your nose into the kitchen sink. Then answer to the question: are you a slave? You have just one option. Yeee, login successful. :)