Proving AstraZeneca Vaccines Kill Children

All other GM Adenovirus shots implicated

22-73% Fatality Rate In Vaccine-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT)

In the paper titled “Clinical Features of Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis”, it did a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with Vaccine-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT).

In layperson terms, it means people who experienced both a shortage of platelets (used to form clots and heal wounds) and experienced excessive blood clots in the blood vessels. In short, clotting factor wasn’t where it should be, and turned up where it shouldn’t.

The peer-reviewed paper found mortality was at a minimum 22%, rising as high as 73%:

The paper relates to the “ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine”, which is the technical term for the AstraZeneca shot (Ch - Chimpanze, Ad - Adenovirus, Ox - Oxford, 1 - version 1; nCoV-19 - novel coronavirus 2019, the precursor name to SARS-CoV-2).

Therefore we can establish several things; the Astrazenca shot causes VITT, and VITT in turn has at a minimum a 22% to 73% mortality rate.

ICU Guidance For VITT Concurs

In our prior article, death by dehydration in ICU, we covered documentation for VITT in ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patients.

Back in April 2021, the Intensive Care Society published guidance on VITT in ICU. Like the peer-reviewed paper, it reports a 25-30% mortality rate, up to 50% in European cases, for vaccine-associated thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VATT, also known as VITT) in UK cases admitted to ICU:

The ICS would publish again, in May 2021 (note it ‘supercedes’ VATT and renames it VITT). Notice it says ‘most typically with the AstraZeneca’, but not exclusively, implying other shots also cause this:

There isn’t much dispute that VITT cases have at least 22% mortality rate, and that it is not exclusively AstraZeneca.

What Other Shots Could Be Implicated?

Shots with a similar design profile to AstraZeneca’s. AstraZeneca uses a genetically modified chimpanzee adenovirus, a DNA virus (yes; SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus, so the choice is unusual).

Adenoviruses are a virus that infects adenoids, found at the back of the nose. We’re not entirely sure how that’s supposed to work via a blood injection, given such viruses are usually breathed in.

How similar can technologies be? Well, the Johnson & Johnson technology and AstraZeneca — both of whom use GM adenoviruses — were so similar, that the US vaccine manufacturer Emergent screwed up 75 million doses by confusing the ingredients, as found in a House Congressional investigation:

How many did the US government order for Johnson & Johnson shots under Trump’s Operation Warp Speed? 100 million. Emergent had screwed up 75 million doses, or three-quarters of the total order, over the confusion and similarity:

Overlooking the fact the vaccine manufacturer had absolutely no quality assurance controls and did not sample the batches until long after they had been manufactured, if the manufacturer has trouble telling the difference, then technologically most people won’t see the distinction either.

It is worth noting that Intensive Care Society publish ICU data for the UK, where Johnson & Johnson shots are far less prevalent than in the US, in contrast AstraZeneca is more common in the UK, given it is a British manufactured shot.

AstraZeneca Partnered With Russia For Sputnik V

In the older (and arguably sloppier) Daily Beagle article “A-mazing Response To Edward's Amazing Announcement”, connections between AstraZeneca and Sputnik V were discussed with alias ‘Edward Slavsquat’.

‘Edward Slavsquat’, a self-reported former Russia Today reporter turned apolitical, has been eagerly calling out Russia’s digital and vaccine encroachments on people’s freedoms there. Readers ought to check out his tongue-in-cheek style.

In terms of Sputnik V, as Edward previously highlighted, the Russian government formed a partnership with AstraZeneca:

This is despite the fact AstraZeneca are British-Swedish:

Essentially, Sputnik V is AstraZeneca technology in all but name only. So we have three implicated shots: AstraZeneca-Oxford, Johnson & Johnson and Sputnik V. So whatever issues plague AstraZeneca, also plague these shots.

Adenoviruses Aren’t Safe Either

As an additional note, Oxford (who partnered with AstraZeneca) claim the chimpanzee adenovirus is “harmless”:

However this is demonstrateably false.

The AstraZeneca shot (ChAdOx1) uses a “sheared” human adenovirus serotype 5 as part of their manufacturing process, as part of their manufacturing process (given they use HEK293, murdered child cells), not chimpanzee:

Page 14

Sputnik V — designed by AstraZeneca — also uses human adenovirus serotype 5 (as well as serotype 26):

Why highlight this? Well, these adenovirus types are all linked causally to VITT in yet another peer-reviewed paper:

PF4 stands for ‘platelet factor 4’, which is a type of clotting agent. In dynamic computer modelling simulations, researchers found the adenovirus will ‘bind’ with the clotting agent, therefore causing clots within the body (also known as thrombosis).

And to top it all off, adenoviruses cause cancer:

Although it says in “non-human animal models”, there will never be a human trial for it. As one bioresearcher and ethicist said in response to the Daily Beagle, it is completely unethical to inject patients with potentially cancer-causing agents to see if it causes cancer. You know, on the grounds it risks killing the patient. Oxford ought to take notes.

So the argument it hasn’t been verified in humans is irrelevant, and to suggest that’s a requirement unethical and psychopathic. Animal models are a reasonable proxy in such ethical dilemma studies. It causes cancer in animals.

Another peer-review study shows human adenoviruses cause issues in children and the immunocompromised:

So not “harmless” as Oxford falsely claimed.

Demonstrating Risks Have Always Outweighed Harms

In July 2021, the BBC were forced to admit that only 25 children in 12 million in the UK (2 per million; 1 in 500,000) were declared to have died from SARS-CoV-2:

This of course ignores the major issues uncovered with PCR tests used to test for SARS-CoV-2 positivity.

However, even taking the information at face value, we can demonstrate shots are harmful. In a Norwegian study of the AstraZeneca shot they found the rate of risk for Thrombosis (part of the VITT package) was 1 in 20,000:

This is a 1 in 20,000 risk per dose. So if you take two doses, it becomes 1 in 10,000, three doses 1 in 5,000, and so on. This assumes material doesn’t ‘stack’ or have multiplier effects either.

If we take the base rate figures for VITT mortality mentioned earlier at 22%, we’d end up with a rough 1 in 91,000 risk of death per one dose administered. If we use the higher end figures, 50% would become 1 in 40,000, and 73% would become 1 in 27,397 risk of death. The risks would increase with more dosages, ignoring any ‘stacking’ effects.

GM Adenovirus shots like AstraZeneca and Sputnik V therefore increase children’s risk of death at least 5-fold (500,000 / 100,000 = 5) and up to 18-fold (500,000 / 27,397 = ~18.2). This isn’t factoring in secondary harms, such as adenovirus driven tumour growths, or other vaccine harms; this is just one known variable, which were known back in early 2021.

Exceeds The Threshold For Recall Even Without

A decade ago, it was found Pandemrix (Swine Flu shot), which was authorised for use in the UK and the US, had a 1 in 55,000 risk of narcolepsy in children. Narcolepsy is a debilitating illness where the individual can suddenly “fall sleep” (pass out) at any time.

This is a particularly dangerous illness as it means if a person was driving and they spontaneously ‘passed out’, they could crash. Or fall down stairs. Or drown in a bath. Or choke on the food they’re eating mid-swallow. They must have a lifelong carer with them; an expensive, full-time employee. The UK government prohibits people with narcolepsy from driving.

All the pharmaceutical loving UK government cronies offer these people is a mere £120,000. Even despite this insultingly low payout, the UK government fought to disgustingly withhold people's — including innocent children’s — compensation having suffered injuries from the shots. They lost.

Many MPs earn the majority of that amount in a single year.

In Ireland (ROI), for contrast, some payouts were as high as 1.2 million Euro for a permanent, lifelong disability with no cure. Even as recently as 4 days ago, another who was a teenager at the time of the injury has finally managed to settle for 750,000 Euro, after years of fighting the legal system. Pandemrix was ultimately suspended in Ireland after many years.

If 1 in 55,000 narcolepsy cases are sufficient to prompt a slow, recluctant withdrawal of the shots, then 1 in 20,000 blood clot risks with a 1 in 100,000 fatality rate easily should meet the threshold. It should have met the threshold in 2021. It should have been recalled.

Dog food with bits of plastic in them get recalled for less. If we don’t accept choke hazards in food, why would we accept clot risks in injections? Why are are the UK government so complicit in the mass murder of children?

Regulatory Agencies Are Child Murderers

There is no valid argument or rebuttal for why the charade of safety carried on for so many years crippling and killing so many. A mortality rate of 22% in 170 confirmed cases is 34 dead in a single year. Well in excess of the 25 dead.

Easy to calculate, no fancy degrees required, easily done in a few hours, understandable, valid, well-referenced sources, transparent.

And remember, shot risks are on top of the risks from SARS-CoV-2. AstraZeneca has not demonstrated any effectiveness in preventing the catching of additional, new strains. So it’s the 1 in 500,000 death risk from SARS-CoV-2 on top of the 1 in 40,000 death risk from the GM adenovirus shots.

They should never have passed regulatory approval, and should have been immediately recalled (not simply quietly ‘discontinued’ to avoid drawing attention to what is effectively a war crime).

This intentional failure to enforce moral, ethical and legal considerations, demonstrates clearly regulatory agencies are wholly and abhorrently corrupt, and ought to have criminal charges filed for what amounts to a genocide.

If they don’t see the inside of a jail cell, or in some States, the death penalty, they will only do it again, and next time more brazenly, with an even greater casual disregard to human life, killing more people, and more children in the process.

---

Subscribe to get more content from The Daily Beagle.

Raise awareness!