This has been bothering me since the get-go. Yes, I'm Jewish. Why didn't the government heed the warnings from Egypt? Why did they not heed the warnings from the IDF guys guarding the border??? Instead, they were told to stand down. Why disable the surveillance balloons?
And several dozens more questions, not to mention eyewitness (Israeli citizens) reports.
I don't know if we'll ever know. But something is terribly wrong here.
Something is indeed extremely wrong. To me the motive isn't entirely clear. Yes, I know people say 'to occupy Gaza', but if that was the Israeli government's sole objective, they could have just as easily done that without harming Israeli citizens.
To me, this strikes there may be something brewing within the ranks. Additional powers domestically? More power to censor free speech (as we're seeing even with news outlets)? Something is terribly wrong here.
"Is it so incomprehensible to think a government would kill their own citizens in order to justify a war with another set of citizens? We don’t think so, dear reader."
We know so. Operation Northwoods, 1962, declassified. Do a text search for "drone", or else read the entire portion entitled "Annex To Appendix To Enclosure A: Pretexts To Justify US Military Intervention In Cuba"
Operation Northwood is slightly different. It is a false flag in a vein, however Northwoods has a staged hijacking (the details are CIA agents would board a plane that then safely lands somewhere else as a drone aircraft takes over). So no actual citizens would be harmed. A disgusting deception, but at least one that doesn't involve self-harming citizens.
Depending on your take, however, there are several alternatives: the UK government killing Dr David Kelly (supposedly a 'suicide' where he dragged himself 200 meters *after* dying) to stop him warning the Iraq war was on an empty pretext; the death of US journalist Michael Hastings, who covered Pentagon corruption; the various 'known to police/known to agencies' terrorists who go on to kill (London bridge attack; he was on day release. The Woolwich stabbing attacks).
One would argue, if the US government knew or were involved, 9/11, and if the UK government knew or were involved, 7/7. Then there's the various terrorist enclaves in Brussels allowed to operate with impunity, resulting in the various train line attacks.
If one sees the citizens in the Donbas region as Ukrainians, then the allowance by Western powers of Ukrainians to kill Ukrainians to spark a wider war. Even if one doesn't see the citizens in the Donbas as Ukrainian, but Russian, the permission of attacks against civilians in order to justify war is still more of the same.
It is not when you look up the gas fields, gas reserves and the potential income from the gas ... both onshore and offshore and in "Surprise Surprise !" occupied land and The Lebanon. Oh and...a new canal to bypass the Suez canal ... worth billions or trillions even.
Just 3 links from the same source but you can find alternative pieces that hopefully back them up:
1. Video: Israel Destroys Gaza to Control World’s Most Important Shipping Lane? The Ben Gurion Canal Linking the Eastern Mediterranean to the Gulf of Aqaba
Gas and oil to me has always struck as a 'side benefit', rather than the main motive. Israel could easily have many overseas subsidies operating in oil rich countries (like how Dutch Shell exploits Nigeria) with 'favourable' returns without the need for attacking their own citizens.
The US has the ability to produce oil domestically, Israel was on the verge of a peace treaty with Saudi Arabia, and frankly I think pre-war Russia would have happily sold them oil as well. So the thought of a pressing need for it seems odd to me.
That said, even if that was their goal... did it really require the murder of their own citizens and the financing of terrorist orgs in order to achieve? Even when America invaded Iraq, they didn't try to squash the local population. I suspect other - depopulation focused - agendas may be at play.
Not saying that other parts of the agenda are not at play; with you there.
Bot with the gas and associated oil and condensate; we are talking about trillions of shekels (did look it up), making Israel into a net extorter and ... guess where they will export to ?.
Of course there is the depopulation agenda, Greater Israel project, the digitisation and blah blah, wealth, land and asset stripping ... and of course smashing National boundaries.
Err disagree totally with you on Iraq by the way ... but hey - ho.
Okay, I suspect your disagreement is on the basis the US government still killed Iraqis, which, yes, I agree happened, but if you were to ask yourself 'do you want to be in Iraq when the US invades, or Gaza when Israel invades', I'm confident you'd suggest Iraq was the safer of the two.
Even so, we're free to disagree. No beef there and I totally get why you would as well.
Nov 24, 2023·edited Nov 24, 2023Liked by The Underdog
Actually no; but yes, but no; LOL, but not no laughing matter
Yes, millions killed by the US, my UK and and... but I am talking afterwards after we had this massive SURPRISE oil and gas investment on the area of the Kurdish region - mainly through Yank firms based in the ME - the investment and tenders coming up was beyond belief.
I do not know the latest as have been out of the O&G business for just over 4 years now but I know until my last days running my firm; any idiot going out there to work as an engineer HAD to be heavily protected 24/7 and I think from memory; it was more Turkey and Iran than our US and UK, taking them out.
It was so disturbing watching Israeli citizens line up for the shots, at the hands of the German/US BioNTech/Pfizer corporations. I thought "have you learned nothing?"
I don't make a great study of Israel/Palestine because complex/history. But you've put together something very plausible there. I've heard whispers of Zionists being fully involved in WW2. Would the US murder its own citizens as a pretext for war? Like 911?
Thank you for your reply comment. Looking at the situation of the people around me who have been vaccinated, it has already been three years, and most of them seem to have no problems.
So, in your opinion, how often do you think excess deaths will occur from cancer, intractable neurological diseases, autoimmune diseases, myocarditis, etc. in 5, 10, and 15 years? ?
What percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have the spike protein, DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 promoter, etc. integrated into their genomes?
Myocarditis has a fatality rate of about 50% within 5 years.
The Daily Beagle has documented at least 110k cancer cases; mortality from these cases depends on treatment modalities; assuming they're fast spreading, I imagine 50% will be dead within 4 years.
"intractable neurological diseases" - these I anticipate to be permanent disabilities, which do not fall under the death radar. They will however be permanently crippled and unable to work. Judging by the insights The Daily Beagle saw on the hidden VAERS database, we know there's at least 153,861 permanent disabilities; these are not likely to be all neurological conditions, however they are severe enough to warrant a VAERS report, and factoring in Lazarus report's under-reporting factor (< 1% of total cases ever reported to VAERS), we can stuff two zeroes onto the end: roughly ~ 15,386,100 permanent disabilities. I imagine 1/3rd would be neurological, but *this is just a guess*.
"What percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have the spike protein, DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 promoter, etc. integrated into their genomes?"
Depends on the definition of 'genomes'. If you mean 'any cell's DNA', ignoring the ones who die, I'd estimate about 98% because there are five routes for integration:
- Natural plasmid integration during cell division
- Viral cell entry encouraging plasmid adoption (read: someone with SARS-CoV-2 at the same time as plasmids from the shots)
- Linearised form of the DNA (linearised DNA integrates more easily than circular plasmid DNA)
This ignores the plasmids being adopted by gut bacteria via horizontal gene transfer.
If you're asking how many get into the sperm/ova, the final percentage is irrelevant given genetic inheritance. My estimate is 11% based on LNP distribution patterns (assuming the plasmids follow the LNPs).
Of those 11%, assuming the child does not get miscarried, die, or suffer a preterm birth resulting in death (read: it survives), there's a probability the gene is recessive, not dominant. This means as the child grows up into an adult and procreates with others, the gene will spread within more and more members of the human race.
So the gene is a silent carrier. It only triggers if both partners have the gene; which based on my early analysis will result in no conception. So even if only 11% have the gene, it will spread and that percentage will grow.
In-fact, the only circumstance it would not spread is if all people with the gene do not conceive or die before conception. Once the gene goes 'resident' it would be earmarked by an ever increasing rate of infertility and drop in rate of births. That's on top of the pre-existing deaths, remember; people who are dead don't get to procreate either.
Just to tack onto my above analysis to make it more explicit:
Based on my projections, the earliest we could see human extinction ('worst case scenario') is within 3 generations, assuming all silent gene carriers procreate with non-silent.
This is a highly unrealistic scenario, and my smoother projection says within 25 generations.
This is based on the following key assumptions:
1) More than 60% of the population took at least one shot with an 11% probability (the 11% probability is on a per shot basis, note); meaning 1 in 10 vaccinated people are now silent gene carriers
2) The gene carrier was "optimally" designed to be a recessive (silent) gene, rather than dominant; if the gene is dominant it will burn itself out within two generations as none of the inheritors will be able to procreate
3) The human race does not successfully identify the gene in question (read: identify the carriers)
4a) The human race does not develop a countermeasure or a means to mitigate the silent gene, or
4b) The human race refuses to implement the countermeasures (most of the low hanging fruit options are to prevent silent gene carriers from procreating, or more violently, killing them to prevent gene spread; less violent options would be to disable or remove the gene, but gene editing got us into this mess to begin with)
5) Non-carrier males cannot keep it in their pants when confronted with a silent carrier female (or vice versa)
6) Non-carrier males/females avoid procreating to avoid propagating the silent carrier gene which ironically also causes depopulation
7) No attempt is made to reverse this trend, or governments make this worse
We're already seeing the first generations carrying the silent gene growing up if the suspicions are true.
I won't be alive to see this disaster unfold.
It will require a multi-generational effort to combat if my calculations are correct.
PS: There's an additional risk it goes native in bacteria, and also in animal populations, leading to mass extinct events in animals, especially if any received mRNA COVID-19 shots, which I know in some zoos they did.
I'm looking at your article. Excess deaths are currently occurring around the world, and I am very interested in whether they will continue to rise five or ten years from now, or whether they will calm down without becoming a big deal.
My understanding is that it is highly unlikely that 300 million, 500 million, or 1 billion people will die within 10 years due to population reduction plans by Bill Gates, the WHO, the United Nations, the FDA, etc. I think I'll go there.
The thing I'm most curious about is what percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 Hersensor, etc. integrated into their genomes?
Sterilisation shots (DNA integration for a reason, think long term).
How many have died in Ukraine already from the war alone?
How many in Gaza?
By how much has the birth rates dropped in so many countries?
Why is Xi ordering Chinese women to open their legs and start producing more babies?
You can try to suggest the deaths aren't coming, but The Daily Beagle got to see the real VAERS data by accident - a hidden database that the BMJ was basically forced to confront. 2 million are already dead in the US from the shots alone.
It does not include disability.
It does not include sterilisation.
It does not include what is coming next, which is global war.
People like you mocked me back in 2020 when I issued two key predictions:
1) The shots were harmful and nobody should take them, and
2) A war between the US and Russia would break out by 2022
Would you like to see my predictions for 2050?
If we don't 'solve' this genome editing the entire human race goes extinct.
This has been bothering me since the get-go. Yes, I'm Jewish. Why didn't the government heed the warnings from Egypt? Why did they not heed the warnings from the IDF guys guarding the border??? Instead, they were told to stand down. Why disable the surveillance balloons?
And several dozens more questions, not to mention eyewitness (Israeli citizens) reports.
I don't know if we'll ever know. But something is terribly wrong here.
Something is indeed extremely wrong. To me the motive isn't entirely clear. Yes, I know people say 'to occupy Gaza', but if that was the Israeli government's sole objective, they could have just as easily done that without harming Israeli citizens.
To me, this strikes there may be something brewing within the ranks. Additional powers domestically? More power to censor free speech (as we're seeing even with news outlets)? Something is terribly wrong here.
"Is it so incomprehensible to think a government would kill their own citizens in order to justify a war with another set of citizens? We don’t think so, dear reader."
We know so. Operation Northwoods, 1962, declassified. Do a text search for "drone", or else read the entire portion entitled "Annex To Appendix To Enclosure A: Pretexts To Justify US Military Intervention In Cuba"
https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/jfk/northwoods-NARA-FullDocument.pdf
Operation Northwood is slightly different. It is a false flag in a vein, however Northwoods has a staged hijacking (the details are CIA agents would board a plane that then safely lands somewhere else as a drone aircraft takes over). So no actual citizens would be harmed. A disgusting deception, but at least one that doesn't involve self-harming citizens.
Depending on your take, however, there are several alternatives: the UK government killing Dr David Kelly (supposedly a 'suicide' where he dragged himself 200 meters *after* dying) to stop him warning the Iraq war was on an empty pretext; the death of US journalist Michael Hastings, who covered Pentagon corruption; the various 'known to police/known to agencies' terrorists who go on to kill (London bridge attack; he was on day release. The Woolwich stabbing attacks).
One would argue, if the US government knew or were involved, 9/11, and if the UK government knew or were involved, 7/7. Then there's the various terrorist enclaves in Brussels allowed to operate with impunity, resulting in the various train line attacks.
If one sees the citizens in the Donbas region as Ukrainians, then the allowance by Western powers of Ukrainians to kill Ukrainians to spark a wider war. Even if one doesn't see the citizens in the Donbas as Ukrainian, but Russian, the permission of attacks against civilians in order to justify war is still more of the same.
These are just examples off the top of my head.
It is not when you look up the gas fields, gas reserves and the potential income from the gas ... both onshore and offshore and in "Surprise Surprise !" occupied land and The Lebanon. Oh and...a new canal to bypass the Suez canal ... worth billions or trillions even.
Just 3 links from the same source but you can find alternative pieces that hopefully back them up:
1. Video: Israel Destroys Gaza to Control World’s Most Important Shipping Lane? The Ben Gurion Canal Linking the Eastern Mediterranean to the Gulf of Aqaba
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-israel-destroys-gaza-control-world-most-important-shipping-lane/5839470
2. The Two Wars of the West: America Targets Europe as Well as the Middle East. Manlio Dinucci
https://www.globalresearch.ca/two-wars-west/5840602
3. War and Natural Gas: The Israeli Invasion and Gaza’s Offshore Gas Fields
https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-and-natural-gas-the-israeli-invasion-and-gaza-s-offshore-gas-fields/11680
Gas and oil to me has always struck as a 'side benefit', rather than the main motive. Israel could easily have many overseas subsidies operating in oil rich countries (like how Dutch Shell exploits Nigeria) with 'favourable' returns without the need for attacking their own citizens.
The US has the ability to produce oil domestically, Israel was on the verge of a peace treaty with Saudi Arabia, and frankly I think pre-war Russia would have happily sold them oil as well. So the thought of a pressing need for it seems odd to me.
That said, even if that was their goal... did it really require the murder of their own citizens and the financing of terrorist orgs in order to achieve? Even when America invaded Iraq, they didn't try to squash the local population. I suspect other - depopulation focused - agendas may be at play.
Not saying that other parts of the agenda are not at play; with you there.
Bot with the gas and associated oil and condensate; we are talking about trillions of shekels (did look it up), making Israel into a net extorter and ... guess where they will export to ?.
Of course there is the depopulation agenda, Greater Israel project, the digitisation and blah blah, wealth, land and asset stripping ... and of course smashing National boundaries.
Err disagree totally with you on Iraq by the way ... but hey - ho.
Err,
Okay, I suspect your disagreement is on the basis the US government still killed Iraqis, which, yes, I agree happened, but if you were to ask yourself 'do you want to be in Iraq when the US invades, or Gaza when Israel invades', I'm confident you'd suggest Iraq was the safer of the two.
Even so, we're free to disagree. No beef there and I totally get why you would as well.
Actually no; but yes, but no; LOL, but not no laughing matter
Yes, millions killed by the US, my UK and and... but I am talking afterwards after we had this massive SURPRISE oil and gas investment on the area of the Kurdish region - mainly through Yank firms based in the ME - the investment and tenders coming up was beyond belief.
I do not know the latest as have been out of the O&G business for just over 4 years now but I know until my last days running my firm; any idiot going out there to work as an engineer HAD to be heavily protected 24/7 and I think from memory; it was more Turkey and Iran than our US and UK, taking them out.
9/11
It was so disturbing watching Israeli citizens line up for the shots, at the hands of the German/US BioNTech/Pfizer corporations. I thought "have you learned nothing?"
I don't make a great study of Israel/Palestine because complex/history. But you've put together something very plausible there. I've heard whispers of Zionists being fully involved in WW2. Would the US murder its own citizens as a pretext for war? Like 911?
Pearl Harbour might be another analogy some might consider, depending on your take (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/was-pearl-harbour-truly-unprovoked).
Thank you for your reply comment. Looking at the situation of the people around me who have been vaccinated, it has already been three years, and most of them seem to have no problems.
So, in your opinion, how often do you think excess deaths will occur from cancer, intractable neurological diseases, autoimmune diseases, myocarditis, etc. in 5, 10, and 15 years? ?
What percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have the spike protein, DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 promoter, etc. integrated into their genomes?
https://hatchardreport.com/our-worst-nightmare-beckons/
Myocarditis has a fatality rate of about 50% within 5 years.
The Daily Beagle has documented at least 110k cancer cases; mortality from these cases depends on treatment modalities; assuming they're fast spreading, I imagine 50% will be dead within 4 years.
"intractable neurological diseases" - these I anticipate to be permanent disabilities, which do not fall under the death radar. They will however be permanently crippled and unable to work. Judging by the insights The Daily Beagle saw on the hidden VAERS database, we know there's at least 153,861 permanent disabilities; these are not likely to be all neurological conditions, however they are severe enough to warrant a VAERS report, and factoring in Lazarus report's under-reporting factor (< 1% of total cases ever reported to VAERS), we can stuff two zeroes onto the end: roughly ~ 15,386,100 permanent disabilities. I imagine 1/3rd would be neurological, but *this is just a guess*.
"What percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have the spike protein, DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 promoter, etc. integrated into their genomes?"
Depends on the definition of 'genomes'. If you mean 'any cell's DNA', ignoring the ones who die, I'd estimate about 98% because there are five routes for integration:
- LNPs
- Plasmid SV40 promoter (technically speaking there's *two* promoters)
- Natural plasmid integration during cell division
- Viral cell entry encouraging plasmid adoption (read: someone with SARS-CoV-2 at the same time as plasmids from the shots)
- Linearised form of the DNA (linearised DNA integrates more easily than circular plasmid DNA)
This ignores the plasmids being adopted by gut bacteria via horizontal gene transfer.
If you're asking how many get into the sperm/ova, the final percentage is irrelevant given genetic inheritance. My estimate is 11% based on LNP distribution patterns (assuming the plasmids follow the LNPs).
Of those 11%, assuming the child does not get miscarried, die, or suffer a preterm birth resulting in death (read: it survives), there's a probability the gene is recessive, not dominant. This means as the child grows up into an adult and procreates with others, the gene will spread within more and more members of the human race.
So the gene is a silent carrier. It only triggers if both partners have the gene; which based on my early analysis will result in no conception. So even if only 11% have the gene, it will spread and that percentage will grow.
In-fact, the only circumstance it would not spread is if all people with the gene do not conceive or die before conception. Once the gene goes 'resident' it would be earmarked by an ever increasing rate of infertility and drop in rate of births. That's on top of the pre-existing deaths, remember; people who are dead don't get to procreate either.
Just to tack onto my above analysis to make it more explicit:
Based on my projections, the earliest we could see human extinction ('worst case scenario') is within 3 generations, assuming all silent gene carriers procreate with non-silent.
This is a highly unrealistic scenario, and my smoother projection says within 25 generations.
This is based on the following key assumptions:
1) More than 60% of the population took at least one shot with an 11% probability (the 11% probability is on a per shot basis, note); meaning 1 in 10 vaccinated people are now silent gene carriers
2) The gene carrier was "optimally" designed to be a recessive (silent) gene, rather than dominant; if the gene is dominant it will burn itself out within two generations as none of the inheritors will be able to procreate
3) The human race does not successfully identify the gene in question (read: identify the carriers)
4a) The human race does not develop a countermeasure or a means to mitigate the silent gene, or
4b) The human race refuses to implement the countermeasures (most of the low hanging fruit options are to prevent silent gene carriers from procreating, or more violently, killing them to prevent gene spread; less violent options would be to disable or remove the gene, but gene editing got us into this mess to begin with)
5) Non-carrier males cannot keep it in their pants when confronted with a silent carrier female (or vice versa)
6) Non-carrier males/females avoid procreating to avoid propagating the silent carrier gene which ironically also causes depopulation
7) No attempt is made to reverse this trend, or governments make this worse
We're already seeing the first generations carrying the silent gene growing up if the suspicions are true.
I won't be alive to see this disaster unfold.
It will require a multi-generational effort to combat if my calculations are correct.
PS: There's an additional risk it goes native in bacteria, and also in animal populations, leading to mass extinct events in animals, especially if any received mRNA COVID-19 shots, which I know in some zoos they did.
I'm looking at your article. Excess deaths are currently occurring around the world, and I am very interested in whether they will continue to rise five or ten years from now, or whether they will calm down without becoming a big deal.
My understanding is that it is highly unlikely that 300 million, 500 million, or 1 billion people will die within 10 years due to population reduction plans by Bill Gates, the WHO, the United Nations, the FDA, etc. I think I'll go there.
The thing I'm most curious about is what percentage of vaccinated people do you think will have DNA fragmentation, plasmids, SV40 Hersensor, etc. integrated into their genomes?
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-associated-mortality
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/fda-shuts-down-enquiries-about-dna
"it is highly unlikely"
World War 3.
Food shortage.
Sterilisation shots (DNA integration for a reason, think long term).
How many have died in Ukraine already from the war alone?
How many in Gaza?
By how much has the birth rates dropped in so many countries?
Why is Xi ordering Chinese women to open their legs and start producing more babies?
You can try to suggest the deaths aren't coming, but The Daily Beagle got to see the real VAERS data by accident - a hidden database that the BMJ was basically forced to confront. 2 million are already dead in the US from the shots alone.
It does not include disability.
It does not include sterilisation.
It does not include what is coming next, which is global war.
People like you mocked me back in 2020 when I issued two key predictions:
1) The shots were harmful and nobody should take them, and
2) A war between the US and Russia would break out by 2022
Would you like to see my predictions for 2050?
If we don't 'solve' this genome editing the entire human race goes extinct.