The Quasi-Direct Ukrainian War
The Quasi-Direct Ukrainian War
Missing a lung is a 'minor disability'
The Russians recently accused NATO of fighting in Ukraine undercover at Avdeevka (alt: Avdiivka):
In a rare case of adversarial news outlets agreeing, albeit for differing reasons.
The Sun rushed out this gushing propaganda piece bragging how blatantly western troops killed Russians, written by the suspiciously named “Georgie English” (either the Sun only hires the most English of writers, or the propagandists hit British patron St George a bit too hard on the nose).
The Sun then remembers, last minute, they’re supposed to pretend these are ‘foreign fighters’ (of course they’re foreign, they’re not Ukrainian). They also confirm they were operating in the city of Avdeevka:
Notice they didn’t call them mercenaries, or the usual BS excuse, “volunteers” (if you work for pay, lads, you’re a mercenary; volunteers work for free).
The Daily Beagle readers will recall the ever name changing ‘Michael Green’, sorry, Grant Shapps, let the cat out the bag by declaring British troops were going to be sent to Ukraine back in October 2023. Are we really going to be surprised the Sun lets slip there are British troops now active there?
Well, it looks like it isn’t just British troops. But you already knew that.
Documented On YouTube
We can further verify this via another pro-Ukrainian propaganda outlet, hosted on YouTube, called Civ Div, which puts paid to numerous pro-Ukraine YouTube videos (all begging for donation monies — apparently the billions engorged from taxpayers isn’t enough). Notice they all show wartime violence, which YouTube is okay with, apparently.
One of them has this whopper of a line, which literally says “How U.S. Marines Prepare for Ukraine”. Why would US marines be preparing for Ukraine?
…unless they were getting involved.
Civ Div himself claims to be a ‘volunteer’ in Ukraine, and, surprise, a former(?) marine, acting as ‘advisor’ (in a similar, capacity, we suppose, as the Vietnam ‘advisors’?).
Now, perhaps you imagine the Ukrainian military consists of ‘mostly Ukrainians’ and a handful(?) of ‘foreign mercenaries’ fighting by their side.
This can’t be the case, however.
The ‘Minor Disabled’ Get Drafted (Organs Optional)
To give you an idea of how short Ukrainian manpower is, we need only look at the recent mobilisation fliers from December 2023 (less than 2 months ago), detailed by Ukrainian news outlet Strana Today.
From what can be made out of the translation (more screenshots of the pages of the document are at the link), people who are being drafted to the front-lines include, but are not limited to, people who have:
A missing lung
A missing eye
No bladder
A hip replacement
A damaged jaw that prevents them from chewing food
Dwarfism
Paralysis of the limb(s)
Missing fingers
Both breasts removed
We’re not sure how some of these are supposed to survive, let alone fight. Do you think the tank pedals accomodate someone with Dwarfism?
Perhaps the guy who can’t chew food takes a food blender to process his rations with that he plugs into the dirt? And how is he supposed to communicate over the radio? Intense glare?
These — besides others — are classified as “Group 3” disabilities (groups 2 and 1 are more severe). Anyone who cares for someone who is suffering from a Group 3 disability can also be drafted. So the nurse feeding the guy who can’t chew food goes with them.
As the article notes, Ukraine plans to block access to healthcare and access to card payments if they refuse to sign up. Die without healthcare and food or die on the frontlines without healthcare. What a pleasant choice.
European news outlets tried to spin it as “minor” disabilities. Missing your bladder and one of your lungs is a minor disability, is it? Having Dwarfism is a minor disability?
This reeks very much of the same desperation tactics used in the last months of Nazi Germany prior to their defeat — known as ‘Volkssturm’ (‘Folks storm’) — a ragtag militia comprised of the young, the elderly, and the disabled.
This was because Nazi Germany had used up all their able-bodied troops, leaving only those who either hadn’t been drafted due to age, or due to illness.
So contrary to popular belief, it is very unlikely that the majority of the Ukrainian military is actually comprised of Ukrainians (if it was; they wouldn’t have needed to draft the disabled who can’t run away). Ukraine are even hiring Columbians.
You know Columbia, of drug cartel, murder capital fame. Only the best for Ukraine.
Defeat At Avdeevka
Despite all the scraping for mercenaries (and NATO troops pretending to be mercencaries), Ukraine ultimately lost Avdeevka, something only recently reported in mainstream media on the 19th…
…this was despite the fact pro-Russian outlet Intel Slava Z reported the retreat of Ukrianian forces as early as the 15th:
This can only mean either a lot of Ukrainian troops died, got captured or they ran away. Hence the mass mobilisation of the disabled.
Barely a few months earlier, propaganda rags were insisting Russia had admitted defeat or that their fight had ‘fizzled out’ over Avdeevka.
Apparently not.
Now they’re attempting to paint people as Ukraine-hesitant, insisting Ukraine needs even longer range missiles to attack Crimea (for some reason; this isn’t anywhere near Avdeevka), or else ‘Europe gets it’.
As you can see even from pro-Ukrainian maps, Russia are nowhere near Europe. If it has taken them over a year to acquire this much land — bearing in mind Russia are not making full use of their borders — it would be a long time before they acquire much else.
Unless of course, NATO wish to admit there’s a severe manpower shortage in Ukraine and only their ‘mercenaries’ are plugging the gap, meaning NATO are de facto in a direct war with Russia. Even the pro-Russian channels acknowledge this.
The question isn’t, do the public recognise NATO are at direct war with Russia in all but name, but why exactly does Russia play along with this proxy war gimmick? Are they secretly hoping they can just mow down endless mercenaries so they can avoid a nuclear war with +29 other countries?
Oh, and contrary to Civ Div’s complaints of Russian troops shooting mercenaries (refusing to accept surrender)…
…the Geneva conventions makes no provisions for mercenaries (this is probably also why Civ Div takes offense of being called a mercenary). Perhaps this is why Russia are more than happy that NATO refuse to declare war with active troops — they can shoot surrendering mercenaries on sight without a trial.
They can’t complain; to do so would be to admit they’re troops and that this quasi-direct war is a direct war.
Related Articles To Read
The Side Of The Israeli-Gaza War You Might Not Have Heard About
Was Pearl Harbour Truly Unprovoked? (or that time the US sent advisors to China)
Google's Warning For Feb 2024, Sweden Threatens War, Ukraine Mobilisation [paid]
Found this informative?
Help inform?
Thoughts, dear reader?
Great stuff again. But one thing stands out to me and reinforces something I started noticing as a kid; it stands out like a sore thumb - going back to day one of humanity. Most (all?) 'experts', 'leaders', 'authority' are pure evil. Evil does rise to the top, for whatever reason. Going back to the beginning.
Your whole article pointed to that massive fact, but here's what stood out to me (opinion only):
"As the article notes, Ukraine plans to block access to healthcare and access to card payments if they (INCLUDING the severely disabled) refuse to sign up. Die without healthcare and food or die on the frontlines without healthcare. What a pleasant choice."
Amen to your last sentence. Sick bastards.