25 Comments

A DEADLY JOKE - that's the useless injection (they pretend is a 'vaccine') which does NOTHING to stop Covid or it's transmission. It simply shortens recipient's lives, brings back previous illnesses (with more serious eventualities) or can Kill recipients outright.

Perhaps this was the Plan from the outset = To kill of the majority of the World's population in order to Save the Planet from 'fictitious Global Warming'?

All the while these murdering injection manufacturers enjoy ZERO LIABILITY from any adverse reactions or DEATHS that follow their poisons being injected.

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!

Expand full comment

"To kill of the majority of the World's population in order to Save the Planet from 'fictitious Global Warming'?"

Actually global warming doesn't exist (see global warming is a scam article) and is used as a retroactive justification for depopulation agenda. You can tell this because the global warming scaremongering (in 1982 via a UN Rio conference by Maurice Strong, a big oil tycoon) came after the so-called "Georgia Guidestones" which indicate a target population of only 500,000.

The precise reasoning for the depopulation agenda isn't clear (excuses include 'Earth's resources are too limited' but this has been debunked time and again), but I know one thing for sure: the globalists are completely unhinged. I don't think they have any valid reason, I think they want to mass kill.

Expand full comment

Trying to understand your reasoning better -

I think your framing is similar to arguments I've made for suing

(under 18 USC 2333 - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2333)

imposter government officials *in their personal capacities only*, including the Secretary of State. Imposter SoS would be the first listed defendant in an 18 USC 2333 civil suit as the government official authorized to designate terrorist organizations under 18 USC 2333 but who will clearly not designate his own agency, DoD, HHS, DHS, DOJ etc. as terrorist organizations, nor will he designate SecDef, AG, HHS secretary as individual terrorists, to the extent they form a criminal cabal acting together in furtherance of the criminal programs.

I got to the "personal capacity" point by looking at RICO, False Claims Act and others, and noting statutory exemptions for military, Congress, President, Cabinet (SES), and judges.

These exemptions probably also cover pharmaceutical corporate executives who have been brought into US government sovereign status under Defense Production Act and PREP Act declarations since Jan. 2020.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/dual-use-government-officials-of

Do you have a legal theory about how to get past the RICO exemption for government officials acting in their official capacities and private actors, also acting in official capacities to the exten they've been granted sovereign and governmental immunities from suit under DPA and PREP?

Expand full comment

"These exemptions probably also cover pharmaceutical corporate executives who have been brought into US government sovereign status under Defense Production Act and PREP Act declarations since Jan. 2020."

PREP Act has no application on RICO. RICO is for corruption only. PREP is for product injuries.

Pfizer, if it became government by extension, can then be sued for First, Fourth, Seventh and Fourteenth amendment violations, because it would then become Constitutionally bound.

"will clearly not designate his own agency, DoD, HHS, DHS, DOJ etc. as terrorist organizations"

Correct. Primary target should be Pfizer, with the inclination towards exposing their infiltration of said agencies. EcoHealth Alliance and the vaccine manufacturers are third parties. If the US government admit they are part of their own enterprise, they would be admitting to causing the pandemic. It's a lose-lose trap.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

I agree that carefully-drafted civil RICO cases could bring a lot of the program mechanics to better public understanding, even if they got dismissed before discovery.

I don't think US gov officials and programs -- or corporations rendered de facto government agents under DPA -- are vulnerable to Constitutional challenges, both in general under sovereign immunities and under the specific Constitution-superseding/license-to-kill circumstances of PHE+EUA declarations.

To the extent RICO claims are separated from specific products or acts tied to concrete injuries, plaintiffs will get thrown out for lack of standing.

To confirm my understanding: Your theory of the case is that the entity that has infiltrated US gov is Pfizer, as a pharma corporation, through infiltration of FDA as pharmaceutical regulator?

https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/map/ClaimsagainsttheGovernment.html

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Nov 2, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

"this may be very well indemnified"

I've been told people were legally 'untouchable' before, but I think you're all familiar with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislane Maxwell, and the latest addition, Sam Bankman-Fried.

The "indemnification" under PREP Act is unsound Constitutionally. I have put it forward as an argument previously on The Daily Beagle, however it requires big financial backers and heavy legal hitters to pursue.

Unfortunately the success I had against OSHA has not repeated itself with PREP Act proposal, likely because whilst my OSHA fight applied legal technicalities everyone could understand, the opposition to PREP Act requires novel arguments based on Constitutionality requiring a court precedent fight all the way up to SCOTUS.

RICO is an easier reach and more understandable to most people, and actually arguably more damaging. But it requires you target either corporations *or* name individuals specifically, such as Albert Bourla or Scott Gottlieb. It won't hit agencies, but your goal ultimately isn't to cripple the agencies; it is to take down the corrupt people within those agencies.

Set a few hard examples and I guarantee the rest of their cronies will fall into retreat.

I think the CEOs of AstraZeneca-Oxford, BioNTech, Pfizer, Moderna, CureVac, Johnson & Johnson would be a good starting point, along with former heads of the FDA such as Scott Gottlieb and Stephen Hahn. You could then snowball to accommodate others; but I feel like they could become separate RICO cases. One per company/CEO.

Expand full comment

Wow.

"Any supposed anti-vaccine organisation that doesn’t use this (or any of the other proposals, such as how to take down the immunity to liability for both National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and PREP Act) is purely controlled opposition designed to slow down the resistance movement against this medical fascist state."

Are you planning to rub this in the face of the various grifters, aka. supposed anti-vaccine organisations?

Expand full comment

I've detailed a great many various lawsuits that have been left on the table whilst many an organisation feigns powerlessness in the face of the onslaught of our rights.

It is one thing for a corrupt court to toss out a case. I get those failures. It is entirely another if an organisation with deep pockets never even tries. And if they feel any of my particular legal suggestions are unviable, they are welcome to criticise and pick apart whichever aspects or flaws they perceive.

I've involved myself in enough politics and enough law to know when someone isn't even trying.

Expand full comment

I hear you. About "many an organisation feigns powerlessness in the face of the onslaught of our rights", I was thinking - to name a few - Steve Kirsch, Reiner Fuellmich, David Martin and the likes (I'm still not completely sure about RFK Jr), who give a lot of good info, make a lot of noise about suing and seeking justice, and then end up with nothing even remotely workable.

I understand Mathew Crawford is planning to out the grifting and inexplicably delayed actions of MFM superstars who reek of conflicts of interest. He seems to imply that some of them have it all in place to rake in from bringing down Pfizer on the grounds of bad manufacturing practices and then whitewashing the mRNA platform into which they have heavily invested. I really don't know, but I'm looking forward to read on this topic. I've always felt Mathew was the candid and naive one, working his ass off on his own, and then getting drawn into a hornet's nest of people who don't mind making a little bit (or a huge heap) of money on the side. He sometimes sounds a little paranoid about it.

Maybe it would be interesting to also have feedback from Katherine Watts on the legal aspects of what you suggest, and from Sasha Latypova as a former pharma insider and regulatory expert.

Expand full comment

Have been thinking about this quite a bit lately.

The main conflict of interest I see for the lawyers fixated on commercial product liability strategies (in pursuit of which they're trying to break off the VICP/CICP provisions from the rest of the PREP/EUA statutes as severable, and unconstitutional takings of property interest in litigation proceeds, while *leaving the core of the PREP/EUA kill programs intact*) is that -- if they're successful -- they can spend the rest of their lives chasing the money in the pharma companies or successor pharma corps, and the higher the body count as the years go by, the better for their firm profits.

Expand full comment

Well, if so those characters will redefine "shady". But you're right, it fits the current model - banking, financial, industrial or otherwise - quite well: factoring in future losses and possibly making a few bucks in the process. It all looks like a military strategy, war profiteers, double agents and traitors included.

Constant war is not even a problem, what matters is *we* are one or two wars behind, while *they* are planning ahead years in advance, as clearly demonstrated by your invaluable research on the incremental tweaking of the regulatory environment that allowed blurring the line between drugs and bioweapons, pharma and military and ultimately, peace and war.

Expand full comment

Oh well, I just realized Katherine Watt has already volunteered some feedback while I was writing my reply.

Expand full comment

Can't argue your summary of facts because everything we hear is tainted with the underlying intention = To take total CONTROL of all non-Elite humans that survived poisonous injections that supposedly dealt with Fauci's GoF modified Coronavirus.

Freedom will disappear and Slavery to the evil New World Order will become the new normal!

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer and fight the NWO.

Expand full comment

Amazing piece of work. Chapeau.

Expand full comment

For those of you wondering what you can do as actionable material if you can't afford a lawsuit, *forward* this article to your State's Attorney General and file another copy to your State's governor.

It does not matter which 'colour' or party that State is. Forward it regardless to both to your State's AG and governor. If they ignore it they will make themselves complicit in said RICO.

Do not hurl abuse. Please be professional. Can be as simple as 'see link for further details' or as detailed as asking them when they plan to engage the corruption. It is well documented, it is time to move forward and deal with this tragic harm to society.

Expand full comment

Big Pharma could load every Covid Vax vial with dog poo, there are no consequences as they enjoy ZERO LIABILITY! How can this even be acceptable? It doesn't work and is Genetically Modification?

Covid - The biggest and most sinister 'confidence trick' in human history! Far worse than a 'DISASTER' because it was deliberately planned for decades, launched for financial gain and a sinister DEPOPULATION program! And vax makers operate with a NO LIABILITY Shield! Why?

Covid Vax doesn't work. The DEADLY injections, they pretend are vaccines, are far more dangerous than Covid. IVERMECTIN WORKED but had to be hidden by Big Pharma so that their FRIENDS at the FDA could give them an EUA = 'LICENCE to KILL' with impunity, whilst making fortunes and depopulating the planet.

Many of us already know that FLU was 'cancelled' in 2020 to falsify the Covid numbers. Also every death in hospital, from any cause was categorised a COVID DEATH if the patient was tested for Covid. If the patient (falsely) tested POSITIVE during their occupation, and subsequently died = IT WAS ALWAYS REGISTERED as a COVID DEATH!

There never was a Scamdemic, but the man-enhanced coronavirus, was planned, created and released to justify a 'profit making cure'. The 'CURE' never worked but denigrated recipients' natural immunities, so that they had less resistance to ALL pre-existing and future illnesses they might have encountered. All will now die younger than they might have!

Covid - a cunning but highly profitable plan to undermine the financial stability of ALL NATIONS, make vast profits for the now CORRUPT Big Pharma, whilst depopulating the planet. The objective is/was to reduce Global Warming whilst making a fortune.

Vast PROFITS with absolutely no liability or risk because Governments assumed the responsibility to compensate the thousands that suffered and died following the injection (called a VACCINE). Governments were assured the useless but POISONOUS injections were "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE". What a Fantastic Business Plan!

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!

Expand full comment

That's a shot and a miss. We know DoD actually manufactured and distributed the poisons. Pfizer has used that defense already

Expand full comment

In which legal case?

Expand full comment

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. Brook Jackson,

Plaintiff,

v.

VENTAVIA RESEARCH GROUP, LLC;

PFIZER INC.; ICON PLC,

Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

Expand full comment

Incorrect. I spoke with Brook. The judge reopened the case. It wasn't related to DoD anything, but a motion to dismiss (which is common in a lot of legal disputes).

Randomly filing a citation without a quoted excerpt is disappointing and I did give you the benefit of the doubt. If I catch you trying to lie and discourage lawsuits against Pfizer again I will ban you.

Expand full comment

To be fair, it has been convoluted. At 38min40sec is what you mean by 'judge reopened the case' https://rumble.com/v373tu3-ep.-173-ohio-1-trump-and-twitter-andy-ngo-trial-fbi-shooting-and-more-viva-.html

Truncale did dismiss the case after 'The United States' Statement of Interest Supporting Dismissal of the Amended Complaint' ,

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/recap-of-jackson-v-pfizer-whistleblower

On Oct. 4, 2022, US Government stepped into the case again — this time taking Pfizer’s side in the dispute, concurring with Pfizer that there was never any fraud to prosecute, because Pfizer was never obligated to conduct valid clinical trials in order to receive payment for the manufactured bioweapons that they refer to as ‘vaccines.’

2022.10.04 US Gov Statement of Interest in support MtD

So for those trying to get up to speed in the case at 1hr45min Jan 7,2024 https://rumble.com/v45n92n-ep.-192-the-biggest-cases-of-2024-trump-to-amos-miller-to-brook-jackson-viv.html this approach and it's strengths and weaknesses was mentioned by Katherine in the comments above. And here

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/whatever-is-in-the-biochemical-weapons

Oct. 19, 2023 - Breaking: Pfizer is going under the bus... (Sasha Latypova https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/breaking-pfizer-is-going-under-the ) - “…As part of “covid live military exercise” it was always planned that when deaths and injuries become so undeniable, that 98%+ Americans refuse the boosters (and technically become anti-vaxxers), and the truth about DOD deploying bioweapons on Americans with intent to kill and harm becomes sort of known, Pfizer will be “prosecuted” with much great publicity (to drown out the truth)…”

Expand full comment

Who is to be the defendant in your RICO cases? The federal, state or local government cannot be sued under RICO. "Government entities are incapable of forming malicious intent necessary to support RICO action" 18 USCS § 1964. We would all disagree with this reasoning but it is in the statute. You cannot successfully use their own laws against them. Similar to the idea of repealing PREP, how would you do that in their legislature and their president with the veto pen? Engaging in ill-conceived lawsuits in their courts is not exactly "trying."

Expand full comment

"Similar to the idea of repealing PREP, how would you do that in their legislature and their president with the veto pen?"

PREP is Unconstitutional. You overturn it at SCOTUS, you don't pass new legislature because the old one is already faulty. Why is it unconstitutional? It gives HHS the power to enact laws granting immunities in violation of the Fourteenth amendment.

Expand full comment

If necessary, you name the individuals specifically who are involved, and bypass the corporation/agency altogether.

Expand full comment

Pfizer. See video.

Expand full comment