GAO report to Congress in 2006 warned against all medical providers to use Electronic Health Care Record software because designed extremely poorly with mistakes used by other providers with no audit trail for edits after original data time stamped. All my Electronic Health Records are incorrect with no diagnostic code for medical surgery mistake for the reason that the prescription or procedure is to treat causes from that medical mistake.
Feb 1, 2023·edited Feb 1, 2023Liked by The Underdog
A randomised trial means participants are randomly assigned to either the placebo or intervention arm of the trial. The participants don't know which arm of the trial they're in. Observer-blind means the data-collectors also don't know which arm of the trial any participant is assigned to until after the trial ends, when they are 'unblinded'.
So randomised in that sense doesn't refer to how data are collected.
(I know you know this stuff. It just read slightly oddly in your article. 😊)
All researchers into the activities of big pharma need to understand the politics of this. The days when one reported criminality to the appropriate authority, and then sat back thinking "Job well done", are long gone. In today's toxic and lawless environment, the incriminating data needs first to be broadcast over the internet so that the whole worlds knows what's going down. Then it must be sent to every regulatory agency and politician including the specific official in charge of this function; such advice as a registered letter.
Then the media, both MSM and real information and communication systems (ie you and me), plus targeted regulatory body, need to be told the predictable sequence of events: (1) Allowable processing timeline to save lives otherwise needlessly lost; (2) The expected date of announcment of remedial measures; (3) The public protest time and location pertaining to agency failure to respond; (4) The date of citizens arrest of all officials in default; (5) the time and place of People's Trial.
The public then needs to be asked what penalty should apply to the negligent officials, considering police and courts have not acted. A check list is essential, with options including: forced dismissal, imprisonment, public beating; installation in stocks; whipping; and execution. Building a scafold, gibbet, or chopping block outside the said building will do marvelous things to response precision.
Directions to the location of burial of deceased(s) at local landfill site, in the event there are grieving relatives. Nah. Just joking. Just a job number for the local backhoe operator will suffice.
GAO report to Congress in 2006 warned against all medical providers to use Electronic Health Care Record software because designed extremely poorly with mistakes used by other providers with no audit trail for edits after original data time stamped. All my Electronic Health Records are incorrect with no diagnostic code for medical surgery mistake for the reason that the prescription or procedure is to treat causes from that medical mistake.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1621421875690610690.html
Exemplary! Phanks!
I did like your turn of phrase, 'artificially crimps', though. Nicely put!
If Steve Kirsch had more sense he'd hire you as a fulltime researcher. Yoh hit it out of the park every time!
A randomised trial means participants are randomly assigned to either the placebo or intervention arm of the trial. The participants don't know which arm of the trial they're in. Observer-blind means the data-collectors also don't know which arm of the trial any participant is assigned to until after the trial ends, when they are 'unblinded'.
So randomised in that sense doesn't refer to how data are collected.
(I know you know this stuff. It just read slightly oddly in your article. 😊)
All researchers into the activities of big pharma need to understand the politics of this. The days when one reported criminality to the appropriate authority, and then sat back thinking "Job well done", are long gone. In today's toxic and lawless environment, the incriminating data needs first to be broadcast over the internet so that the whole worlds knows what's going down. Then it must be sent to every regulatory agency and politician including the specific official in charge of this function; such advice as a registered letter.
Then the media, both MSM and real information and communication systems (ie you and me), plus targeted regulatory body, need to be told the predictable sequence of events: (1) Allowable processing timeline to save lives otherwise needlessly lost; (2) The expected date of announcment of remedial measures; (3) The public protest time and location pertaining to agency failure to respond; (4) The date of citizens arrest of all officials in default; (5) the time and place of People's Trial.
The public then needs to be asked what penalty should apply to the negligent officials, considering police and courts have not acted. A check list is essential, with options including: forced dismissal, imprisonment, public beating; installation in stocks; whipping; and execution. Building a scafold, gibbet, or chopping block outside the said building will do marvelous things to response precision.
Directions to the location of burial of deceased(s) at local landfill site, in the event there are grieving relatives. Nah. Just joking. Just a job number for the local backhoe operator will suffice.