Ah, the giants of the earth are busy tending to their flocks -- whether the flocks want it or not. Good thing human lifespan is finite in all cases, as it provides for cessation of salient cases of idiocy and associated hubris.
Malnutrition vaccines! (You couldn't make it up!) Apparently predicted by slimeball Hotez for the impending famine that the NWO have planned for us humans!
I couldn't quite believe my eyes when i read the words 'malnutrition vaccines', sounded like a really bad joke. Then someone showed me the 'peer reviewed' paper. And Hotez' name.
I feel like that is false attribution and hero worship. I imagine you'll argue he single handedly writes Children's Health Defence... where they file lawsuits against individual schools?
I'd also ask you not forget people like Andrew Wakefield, Alex Jones (whether or not you agree with all of his views), Del Bigtree, Jessica Rose, Steve Kirsch, and god knows how many parents trying to fight the system (pretty sure none of those vaccine injury lawsuits were spearheaded by RFK). Here's my contribution:
I spearheaded the 27 State campaign against the US vaccine mandates on the Federal level leading to the SCOTUS lawsuit that overturned Biden's federal overreach. I convinced BLM to switch sides (which is why you will notice they've stopped appearing in media), secured support from the Vegan Society, got the Islamists onboard (Christians were already onboard; Jewish people weren't sure), helped take the EMA leaks from a minor obscure event to the biggest uncovering of Pfizer and EMA fraud (getting the attention of Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose and the BMJ), and triggered Ron DeSantis' Grand Jury investigation.
I also successfully fought no less than three times against the UK government's attempt to introduce vaccine passports, on each occasion bringing up a new subset of arguments that have flagged down the planned legislation.
I've also attempted to sway Louis Rossmann (he didn't change position; but three virologist experts fled the questions even with a money pot on offer, much like Peter Hotez with Joe Rogan). I've gotten the Daily Mail to issue a correction for a vaccine article (practically unheard of), got an academic to withdraw a factually inaccurate article (never to be heard from again), and I worked with another Substacker to convince Andrew Bridgen to switch sides; he received a copy of the same document that formed the justification for Florida spearheading the 27 State lawsuit; it's the one with *160 citations*.
Now, you might argue this has only been recently, in the last 3 short years, and I'd agree; because in the years prior to those 3 years RFK Jr was around, and naive and gullible trust in vaccines was at an all time high. RFK has been supposedly working on the issue in 30 years, and yet I've managed to gain more traction and influence on an infinitely smaller budget in 3 years? Is RFK Jr even trying? Because I don't think he is.
You don't need to become a President to overturn faulty Congressional legislation. You need a damn good lawsuit; and lawsuits don't have to be elected or pander to polling figures.
Point taken. All I am saying is RFK has fought against vaccines and made very good strides with his organization, so to call him controlled opp seems unjustified.
Sounds like you've done a lot without appropriate appreciation, so thank you.
It isn't the absence of opposition; instead, the opposition is severely throttled. Words, not actions; or if actions, the actions are severely delayed, take a long time, or don't produce any tangible effect. How long has National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act been around for?
I don't believe in the viability of any political candidacy because the entire political system is broken. Once in power, what's to stop another not-drained-swamp session? Nothing. 'We'll vote for someone else' - the someone else being another wordsmith ConOp who promises the moon but can't even proverbially deliver a rock.
It is such 'huh?' outcome, but people had that reaction when I said the dementia patient Joe Biden was going to get Presidency. 'He can't even string a sentence together, how can he get Presidency?' and yet... here we are. Broken, rigged system, where they buy out Senators and fix the Electoral College and rig the primaries all "legally".
I'm sorry to say, but RFK Jr is a stall. There are no peaceful options. Public don't seem to want to learn that lesson, so once more into the political tumble dryer of 'they're trying to kill you' we go...
JFK jr is part of the establishment. He supported and endorsed Hillary Clinton, a Monsanto and Big Pharma shill, not once, not twice but THREE times. His corporate sponsors want him to be the next POTUS to move their climate change grift forward. Check out Critique of RFK Jr. Presidential Candidacy, Excerpt from Digital Sandboxes, Cognitive Domain Mgmt by Alison McDowell. He is no different than all the other establishment swarm: power, profit and control is all they care about
However, I find proof that RFK is conop is sorely lacking. I am leery of throwing accusations of being conop around too freely as it fractures the movement.
update: funnily enough, I just received this email from CHD:
George Watts Jr. was only 24 years old when he died . . . from what his autopsy confirmed were complications related to COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis.
Watts got the vaccine because his community college mandated it.
He also agreed to get it because government officials misled him to believe that Pfizer’s vaccine was “fully licensed” and “safe and effective.”
Please donate today to help support CHD’s landmark lawsuit against the DOD
there's lots of things they didn't do that could have been good. Cherrypicking a single thing they did not do, then calling them conop is a fallacy.
Have you asked them why they didn't do this particular thing? Maybe they found it to be a non-useful approach. Maybe they thought it should be the states who did this and NGO's would only muddy the waters. Maybe they wanted to use limited resources in other ways.
Why is it necessary for all parties to sponsor this if they are NOT conop?
The conclusion from this evidence the RFK is conop is weakly established. It is possible that he is, but I see an insufficient evidentiary claim in this line of reasoning.
Opinions and talk are both surprisingly cheap in this era.
I still wonder why he's never filed for a Due Process violation lawsuit against the immunity to liability law.
I also heard a rumour he sponsored NCVIA, although deeply buried and not something easily found on the Internet, given the bill was passed back in 1986 when the internet was still in its infancy.
I think the public are far too gullible in their trust of artificially promoted heroes. And too naive in their understanding of Presidential politics; the President's power is not absolute and to implement any of those things you'd need Congressional backing. Ever heard of a lame duck President?
I'm sure Kennedy will no doubt hand wring and blame the failures on a lack of control over Congress, but... it was never meant to be viable to begin with anyway. False hope. Uniparty.
Matters not what Country now, what colour the party is or the name ... the main parties at least are just 2 cheeks of the same arse... each bowing to the same globalist parasites, each with the same end goal, but maybe having a different approach as to manipulating the muppets and sheeple.
We have exactly the same thing in the UK.
Totally agree with your comment and no offence to the Yanks, but they seem to be a more "manipulative" than us Brits and the Europeans... who can more than often see through this crap.
PS Did we ever have "Representative Democracy"; when the parties chose the candidates ??.
Representative is more the colloquial name for the model; more representative of a region than the people living there (many of the earliest MPs were just so-called "nobles" or barons, representing their own estates' interests, not the workers operating there).
It's shifted to mean 'representing the people', but which people? The vocal minority? The silent majority (of which no-one can read the thoughts of)? Not all people agree. And that assumes a good faith attempt by the 'representative' to actually represent. In truth, they don't represent the people, never can and never will.
As BlackRock employee says: you can buy a senator for $10k. But, if you know how to word things, it is less than that: I've influenced politicians for free, and I don't think people would believe me if I told them of some of the things I managed to pull off. (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/have-i-been-able-to-redpill-people).
The system is completely broken and in dire need of an overhaul: if a Brit can have a huge impact on the US elections using just social media and email for free... think how badly the system is being exploited by continuous attacks.
Well, at least an Idiocracy like future is being prevented.
Actually, the film Idiocracy centres on their being a mass famine, and only someone of average intelligence being able to solve their problems.
Healthcare is also heavily automated, and staffed by idiots who don't question how the system works.
And a court system involving a highly opinionated judge executing questionable decision making skills based on their perceived bias.
And a President staffed with moronic cabinet members.
And an idiot President.
...hang on a minute.
Ah, the giants of the earth are busy tending to their flocks -- whether the flocks want it or not. Good thing human lifespan is finite in all cases, as it provides for cessation of salient cases of idiocy and associated hubris.
Malnutrition vaccines! (You couldn't make it up!) Apparently predicted by slimeball Hotez for the impending famine that the NWO have planned for us humans!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.
I couldn't quite believe my eyes when i read the words 'malnutrition vaccines', sounded like a really bad joke. Then someone showed me the 'peer reviewed' paper. And Hotez' name.
How has no-one noticed this paper before?
RFK has done more to expose the dangers of vaccines than all of us on Substack combined ever could, so...
I feel like that is false attribution and hero worship. I imagine you'll argue he single handedly writes Children's Health Defence... where they file lawsuits against individual schools?
I'd also ask you not forget people like Andrew Wakefield, Alex Jones (whether or not you agree with all of his views), Del Bigtree, Jessica Rose, Steve Kirsch, and god knows how many parents trying to fight the system (pretty sure none of those vaccine injury lawsuits were spearheaded by RFK). Here's my contribution:
I spearheaded the 27 State campaign against the US vaccine mandates on the Federal level leading to the SCOTUS lawsuit that overturned Biden's federal overreach. I convinced BLM to switch sides (which is why you will notice they've stopped appearing in media), secured support from the Vegan Society, got the Islamists onboard (Christians were already onboard; Jewish people weren't sure), helped take the EMA leaks from a minor obscure event to the biggest uncovering of Pfizer and EMA fraud (getting the attention of Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose and the BMJ), and triggered Ron DeSantis' Grand Jury investigation.
I also successfully fought no less than three times against the UK government's attempt to introduce vaccine passports, on each occasion bringing up a new subset of arguments that have flagged down the planned legislation.
I've also attempted to sway Louis Rossmann (he didn't change position; but three virologist experts fled the questions even with a money pot on offer, much like Peter Hotez with Joe Rogan). I've gotten the Daily Mail to issue a correction for a vaccine article (practically unheard of), got an academic to withdraw a factually inaccurate article (never to be heard from again), and I worked with another Substacker to convince Andrew Bridgen to switch sides; he received a copy of the same document that formed the justification for Florida spearheading the 27 State lawsuit; it's the one with *160 citations*.
Now, you might argue this has only been recently, in the last 3 short years, and I'd agree; because in the years prior to those 3 years RFK Jr was around, and naive and gullible trust in vaccines was at an all time high. RFK has been supposedly working on the issue in 30 years, and yet I've managed to gain more traction and influence on an infinitely smaller budget in 3 years? Is RFK Jr even trying? Because I don't think he is.
You don't need to become a President to overturn faulty Congressional legislation. You need a damn good lawsuit; and lawsuits don't have to be elected or pander to polling figures.
Point taken. All I am saying is RFK has fought against vaccines and made very good strides with his organization, so to call him controlled opp seems unjustified.
Sounds like you've done a lot without appropriate appreciation, so thank you.
That's the nature of controlled opposition.
It isn't the absence of opposition; instead, the opposition is severely throttled. Words, not actions; or if actions, the actions are severely delayed, take a long time, or don't produce any tangible effect. How long has National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act been around for?
I would not trust a man who injects his own children with mine. Even Congress exempted themselves from the shots (see the ever terrible Poynter article: https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2021/why-is-congress-exempt-from-the-biden-covid-vaccine-mandate/)
I don't believe in the viability of any political candidacy because the entire political system is broken. Once in power, what's to stop another not-drained-swamp session? Nothing. 'We'll vote for someone else' - the someone else being another wordsmith ConOp who promises the moon but can't even proverbially deliver a rock.
Your choices are decided at the Primaries anyway. Remember when the US courts said it was okay to rig the DNC Primaries against Bernie Sanders? (https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/)
My prediction (not advocacy, they're all corrupt in my view), is the system will be rigged to elect Mike Pence. I wrote about it a while back: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/why-mike-pence-is-going-to-become
It is such 'huh?' outcome, but people had that reaction when I said the dementia patient Joe Biden was going to get Presidency. 'He can't even string a sentence together, how can he get Presidency?' and yet... here we are. Broken, rigged system, where they buy out Senators and fix the Electoral College and rig the primaries all "legally".
I'm sorry to say, but RFK Jr is a stall. There are no peaceful options. Public don't seem to want to learn that lesson, so once more into the political tumble dryer of 'they're trying to kill you' we go...
JFK jr is part of the establishment. He supported and endorsed Hillary Clinton, a Monsanto and Big Pharma shill, not once, not twice but THREE times. His corporate sponsors want him to be the next POTUS to move their climate change grift forward. Check out Critique of RFK Jr. Presidential Candidacy, Excerpt from Digital Sandboxes, Cognitive Domain Mgmt by Alison McDowell. He is no different than all the other establishment swarm: power, profit and control is all they care about
I agree with much of what you said.
However, I find proof that RFK is conop is sorely lacking. I am leery of throwing accusations of being conop around too freely as it fractures the movement.
It's a fine line to walk, imo.
Ask yourself this.
Did Children's Health Defence ever sponsor the 27 State lawsuit against the US vaccine mandates?
update: funnily enough, I just received this email from CHD:
George Watts Jr. was only 24 years old when he died . . . from what his autopsy confirmed were complications related to COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis.
Watts got the vaccine because his community college mandated it.
He also agreed to get it because government officials misled him to believe that Pfizer’s vaccine was “fully licensed” and “safe and effective.”
Please donate today to help support CHD’s landmark lawsuit against the DOD
-00-
Lawsuit against DOD.
what do yo think? Just more controlled opp?
If so, why?
there's lots of things they didn't do that could have been good. Cherrypicking a single thing they did not do, then calling them conop is a fallacy.
Have you asked them why they didn't do this particular thing? Maybe they found it to be a non-useful approach. Maybe they thought it should be the states who did this and NGO's would only muddy the waters. Maybe they wanted to use limited resources in other ways.
Why is it necessary for all parties to sponsor this if they are NOT conop?
The conclusion from this evidence the RFK is conop is weakly established. It is possible that he is, but I see an insufficient evidentiary claim in this line of reasoning.
It's not hero worship, btw. It's only virtue of his birth pedigree. It gets him on national shows with huge audiences.
No reason to project on people.
Proof, whilst we're at it:
https://humanevents.com/2021/11/08/27-states-have-filed-lawsuits-against-the-biden-administration-over-vaccine-mandate-so-far/
RFK Jr no longer holds positive opinions of vaccines.
Opinions and talk are both surprisingly cheap in this era.
I still wonder why he's never filed for a Due Process violation lawsuit against the immunity to liability law.
I also heard a rumour he sponsored NCVIA, although deeply buried and not something easily found on the Internet, given the bill was passed back in 1986 when the internet was still in its infancy.
Then there's the awkward part about the Kennedy family having ties to Andrew Cuomo (see: https://www.thelist.com/301456/the-truth-about-andrew-cuomo-and-kerry-kennedys-marriage/), you know, of nursing home deaths infamy (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/15/nyregion/cuomo-nursing-homes.html).
I think the public are far too gullible in their trust of artificially promoted heroes. And too naive in their understanding of Presidential politics; the President's power is not absolute and to implement any of those things you'd need Congressional backing. Ever heard of a lame duck President?
I'm sure Kennedy will no doubt hand wring and blame the failures on a lack of control over Congress, but... it was never meant to be viable to begin with anyway. False hope. Uniparty.
Representative Democracy is Dead.
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/why-representative-democracy-is-dead
Matters not what Country now, what colour the party is or the name ... the main parties at least are just 2 cheeks of the same arse... each bowing to the same globalist parasites, each with the same end goal, but maybe having a different approach as to manipulating the muppets and sheeple.
We have exactly the same thing in the UK.
Totally agree with your comment and no offence to the Yanks, but they seem to be a more "manipulative" than us Brits and the Europeans... who can more than often see through this crap.
PS Did we ever have "Representative Democracy"; when the parties chose the candidates ??.
Representative is more the colloquial name for the model; more representative of a region than the people living there (many of the earliest MPs were just so-called "nobles" or barons, representing their own estates' interests, not the workers operating there).
It's shifted to mean 'representing the people', but which people? The vocal minority? The silent majority (of which no-one can read the thoughts of)? Not all people agree. And that assumes a good faith attempt by the 'representative' to actually represent. In truth, they don't represent the people, never can and never will.
As BlackRock employee says: you can buy a senator for $10k. But, if you know how to word things, it is less than that: I've influenced politicians for free, and I don't think people would believe me if I told them of some of the things I managed to pull off. (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/have-i-been-able-to-redpill-people).
The system is completely broken and in dire need of an overhaul: if a Brit can have a huge impact on the US elections using just social media and email for free... think how badly the system is being exploited by continuous attacks.