I'm just sick of the lies, not just this situation, Gaza, Covid, safe and effective, climate change, "green" energy, wokeism, higher bills, DEI, Disease X! Most of all, I deplore all the lives taken, from everywhere, but particularly the women and children of Gaza.
Aloha Markker. I agree. I would like to add to your list: Sex trafficking of children & adults, the desecration of integrity, morals, ethics, honesty, humanity, and the Sanctity of Life.
Unless NATO have dedicated their entire forces into Kursk under the pretence of being 'Ukrainian', I'm not sure Kursk is going to succeed. That said, it is a suspiciously large operation and the Kursk NPP seems like a strike target.
The only thing I'm baffled by is why they haven't missiled the plant. Is their intention to steal nuclear materials? But why? Ukraine has their own nuclear materials. To frame Russia? It is all a bit weird.
Are these wars being caused by the industrial complex of the USA (joo operators) as cover for the destruction of Palestine/i.e. i$rahell domination of the world?
It is hard to say what the specific objectives are, except from what can be inferred by their telegraphed efforts. My thoughts is this is an expansion of the harms they're trying to inflict on society. Radiation poisoning can cause infertility.
The powers that be are definitely gunning to use nuclear weapons. I think a dirty bomb is exactly what they want to use to really destroy any hope of peace. They have been baiting and goading Putin the entire time. He just isn’t crazy like they are. No one in their right mind would want to poison the planet with a nuclear weapon except the Cabal. God help us all!
Former CIA Larry Johnson says that 30% of the invaders got killed in their RUS-triggering manöver, and that the RUS will change it's rules of engagement from the "Special Mil Op" to anti-terrorist operation. Let's see if it means that no prisoners taken?
Putin seems to have finally understood that this war won't be solved at negotiation table, but on the battlefield. Really scary if this turns into total war even if it was only in UKR, as new desperade moves will be made.
Not impressive for starters. Not 'battalions' but 'brigades'. I can name three myself off the cuff: 80th, 82nd and 22nd I think. Two of them rotated out by now. Doesn't impress, that sort of gaff.
Everyone looks for motives and PR seems clearly a main one.
Secondary the NPP for whatever reason.
But thirdly there's now talk of taking civilian hostages. Astounding idea but in fact it is happening; depending on how you look at it perhaps, or maybe not: I'm told technically it simply IS 'kidnapping'. What is it? It is the forcible removal of the civilians from occupied areas and moving them into their own country, the occupier, his country: Kiev Ukraine. And that's what they're doing.
They're destroying the bridges across the Siem (?) and that has the effect more of preventing civilians fleeing than stopping Russian reinforcements coming in. i.e. it therefore seems directed that way.
And fourthly there's 'distraction' to suck allied forces away from Donbas. I say 'fourth' but it is considered by many to be the main one.
Fifth there's a suggestion of it being a distraction but of a slightly different kind: a distraction from the real much anticipated attack they are going to mount. Which some say will be in Belgorod direction in truth and many others say will be in Zaporizhia aimed at the ZNPP.
All of the above fairly easily discoverable from TG and sites such as 'resident' and 'legitimny', 'colonel cassad', 'two major', 'southfront'.
I see you've since edited your comment, so I will respond to the edited version.
"PR seems clearly a main one."
There is easier ways to generate PR without risking troop lives. NPP seems to be the primary target; it's the only thing of value within Kursk.
"there's now talk of taking civilian hostages."
I've seen videos of them shooting at civilian cars. I am pretty sure the civilians are dead. Notice Ukraine only has videos and images of Russian soldiers as POWs... not a single civilian among them.
"They're destroying the bridges across the Siem (?) and that has the effect more of preventing civilians fleeing than stopping Russian reinforcements coming in"
The main goal would be to stop reinforcements. Unarmed civilians aren't a threat. Even WW2 standard M.O. was to blow up bridges that can't be captured to prevent reinforcements.
"there's 'distraction' to suck allied forces away from Donbas"
I know I didn't mention it in the article, but that hasn't happened. 95% of 'New York' (in Ukraine) has been captured and Russia is on the verge of taking the entirety of the Donbas.
"Which some say will be in Belgorod direction in truth and many others say will be in Zaporizhia aimed at the ZNPP."
Even recently after I wrote this article, ZNPP has been hit again by another Ukrainian drone.
Belgorod is near Kursk and an opportunistic target; likely part of the Kursk strike.
"All of the above fairly easily discoverable from TG and sites such as 'resident' and 'legitimny', 'colonel cassad', 'two major', 'southfront'."
Whilst I do read Russian sources (thank you for introducing me to new ones) - the main one being Intel Slava Z - I avoid trying to rely on solely Russian sources, given a portion of my Western audience are critical of Russian sources.
Instead I point towards more 'self-evident' claims which have an impact. Whilst there's many aspects to Kursk that have occurred, most people in the West are disinterested about war in general; they're only concerned with issues that will impact them (namely, a nuclear reactor meltdown).
I only mention the tactics to demonstrate the NPPs are the goal. This isn't intended to be a detailed report on casualties or losses.
I distinctly recall you were critical of my rebuttals and you previously wrote you were leaving this Substack. Would you like me to help you find the exit? I wouldn't want to clog up your subscription with an unimpressive, terribly written Substack. Give me the nod and I can make it happen.
I'm just sick of the lies, not just this situation, Gaza, Covid, safe and effective, climate change, "green" energy, wokeism, higher bills, DEI, Disease X! Most of all, I deplore all the lives taken, from everywhere, but particularly the women and children of Gaza.
Aloha Markker. I agree. I would like to add to your list: Sex trafficking of children & adults, the desecration of integrity, morals, ethics, honesty, humanity, and the Sanctity of Life.
I suspect like the C19 event ,it's all a scam.
Not sure whether it's a PR exercise to get extra funding or whether there after a dirty bomb (or both).
Suspect in the long run it won't work out well for UK/raine but I don't think it's meant to🍻👍
Unless NATO have dedicated their entire forces into Kursk under the pretence of being 'Ukrainian', I'm not sure Kursk is going to succeed. That said, it is a suspiciously large operation and the Kursk NPP seems like a strike target.
The only thing I'm baffled by is why they haven't missiled the plant. Is their intention to steal nuclear materials? But why? Ukraine has their own nuclear materials. To frame Russia? It is all a bit weird.
Are these wars being caused by the industrial complex of the USA (joo operators) as cover for the destruction of Palestine/i.e. i$rahell domination of the world?
It is hard to say what the specific objectives are, except from what can be inferred by their telegraphed efforts. My thoughts is this is an expansion of the harms they're trying to inflict on society. Radiation poisoning can cause infertility.
The powers that be are definitely gunning to use nuclear weapons. I think a dirty bomb is exactly what they want to use to really destroy any hope of peace. They have been baiting and goading Putin the entire time. He just isn’t crazy like they are. No one in their right mind would want to poison the planet with a nuclear weapon except the Cabal. God help us all!
Former CIA Larry Johnson says that 30% of the invaders got killed in their RUS-triggering manöver, and that the RUS will change it's rules of engagement from the "Special Mil Op" to anti-terrorist operation. Let's see if it means that no prisoners taken?
A sound interview here:
https://www.youtube.com/live/3xhin-fYRvo?si=Y5B0DFkM0xWoAUCm
Putin seems to have finally understood that this war won't be solved at negotiation table, but on the battlefield. Really scary if this turns into total war even if it was only in UKR, as new desperade moves will be made.
I keep waiting for a big move by Russia.... are they waiting on something to time it just right? Anything happening this fall?
Not impressive for starters. Not 'battalions' but 'brigades'. I can name three myself off the cuff: 80th, 82nd and 22nd I think. Two of them rotated out by now. Doesn't impress, that sort of gaff.
Everyone looks for motives and PR seems clearly a main one.
Secondary the NPP for whatever reason.
But thirdly there's now talk of taking civilian hostages. Astounding idea but in fact it is happening; depending on how you look at it perhaps, or maybe not: I'm told technically it simply IS 'kidnapping'. What is it? It is the forcible removal of the civilians from occupied areas and moving them into their own country, the occupier, his country: Kiev Ukraine. And that's what they're doing.
They're destroying the bridges across the Siem (?) and that has the effect more of preventing civilians fleeing than stopping Russian reinforcements coming in. i.e. it therefore seems directed that way.
And fourthly there's 'distraction' to suck allied forces away from Donbas. I say 'fourth' but it is considered by many to be the main one.
Fifth there's a suggestion of it being a distraction but of a slightly different kind: a distraction from the real much anticipated attack they are going to mount. Which some say will be in Belgorod direction in truth and many others say will be in Zaporizhia aimed at the ZNPP.
All of the above fairly easily discoverable from TG and sites such as 'resident' and 'legitimny', 'colonel cassad', 'two major', 'southfront'.
I see you've since edited your comment, so I will respond to the edited version.
"PR seems clearly a main one."
There is easier ways to generate PR without risking troop lives. NPP seems to be the primary target; it's the only thing of value within Kursk.
"there's now talk of taking civilian hostages."
I've seen videos of them shooting at civilian cars. I am pretty sure the civilians are dead. Notice Ukraine only has videos and images of Russian soldiers as POWs... not a single civilian among them.
"They're destroying the bridges across the Siem (?) and that has the effect more of preventing civilians fleeing than stopping Russian reinforcements coming in"
The main goal would be to stop reinforcements. Unarmed civilians aren't a threat. Even WW2 standard M.O. was to blow up bridges that can't be captured to prevent reinforcements.
"there's 'distraction' to suck allied forces away from Donbas"
I know I didn't mention it in the article, but that hasn't happened. 95% of 'New York' (in Ukraine) has been captured and Russia is on the verge of taking the entirety of the Donbas.
"Which some say will be in Belgorod direction in truth and many others say will be in Zaporizhia aimed at the ZNPP."
Even recently after I wrote this article, ZNPP has been hit again by another Ukrainian drone.
Belgorod is near Kursk and an opportunistic target; likely part of the Kursk strike.
"All of the above fairly easily discoverable from TG and sites such as 'resident' and 'legitimny', 'colonel cassad', 'two major', 'southfront'."
Whilst I do read Russian sources (thank you for introducing me to new ones) - the main one being Intel Slava Z - I avoid trying to rely on solely Russian sources, given a portion of my Western audience are critical of Russian sources.
Instead I point towards more 'self-evident' claims which have an impact. Whilst there's many aspects to Kursk that have occurred, most people in the West are disinterested about war in general; they're only concerned with issues that will impact them (namely, a nuclear reactor meltdown).
I only mention the tactics to demonstrate the NPPs are the goal. This isn't intended to be a detailed report on casualties or losses.
I distinctly recall you were critical of my rebuttals and you previously wrote you were leaving this Substack. Would you like me to help you find the exit? I wouldn't want to clog up your subscription with an unimpressive, terribly written Substack. Give me the nod and I can make it happen.
Sorry, I forgot. Thanks for the reminder. Yep, please make it happen. :)