Establishment Wants You To Believe This Is Just An Accident

Oakeshott turns out to be a fairweather friend

Correction: Wrote ‘daughter’ instead of ‘relation’ for Isabel’s relation to Baron Oakeshott. Has been since corrected.

Anna Brees, former member of mainstream BBC, ITV, and of the National Union of Journalists, told people to “Focus on Ferguson”, calling Matt Hancock an “incompetent fool” whilst insisting he is “not a murderer”

Ironically, she calls for debate, which is a reasonable request, but then she goes on to restrict who can actually reply, showing she isn’t actually interested in debating the point, merely shilling the position.

Ironically, she insist she received lots of DMs in agreement (apparently none brave enough to agree in public), from her no doubt restricted DM access account.

She had no response to when the Daily Beagle queried her publicly as to what parts of the evidence in our article isn’t proof.

Anna Brees doesn’t offer up any evidence to justify why Furguson should be the one responsible for the Midazolam murders, either. Brees contradicts herself and tries to call it ‘fearmongering’, despite this being exactly what the mainstread media pundits like herself did in regards to COVID-19.

Bulk Ordering In Advance Shows Intention To Kill

The evidence is clear that the Department of Health and Social Care imported murdering midazolam under Matt Hancock, with advisory from Dr Luke Evans. Dr Luke Evans must have since read the article, because he has now blocked The Daily Beagle without explaining himself or disputing the claims.

As we know from the article, Dr Evans was already preplanning the “good deaths”, with Matt Hancock in agreement. This was no accident.

Oakeshott Is A Fairweather Friend

Source: Cambridge Dictionary

Anna Brees isn’t the only mainstream media source trying to deflect from the Midazolam Murders, however:

Isabel Oakeshott, relation of Liberal Democrat Matthew Oakeshott — Baron Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay — partner of head of Reform Party Richard Tice, former political editor of The Sunday Times, is as rich and as mainstream as they come.

You wouldn’t know it from talking with her, however, where she downplays her various connections and reports herself as just a journalist.

And omits the part about being an international editor, burying it at the bottom of her bio. She doesn’t even mention her political ties to Richard Tice.

Whether you believe the WhatsApp messages to be real or fake — either way, evidence of UK government deception — it is clear from a perusal of history that Isabel Oakeshott is a fairweather friend.

Taking down the Tories is beneficial to the Reform Party, but her work trying to cover up the Midazolam murders is not beneficial to us.

Oakeshott Is Vocally Supportive Of Vaccines

Earlier on in 2021, Oakeshott can be found screaming in all caps that ‘the vaccines work’:

She repeats this view:

And again, where she insists them working is why the UK government is insisting upon them, insisting the elderly were victims of ‘the latest strain’, and not say, Midazolam:

She goes on to mention she has had ‘both jabs’:

She also fluffed the UK government, telling them how great their vaccine rollout is going:

Nadhim Zahawi even thanks her for the praise:

After this, however, in August 2021, Isabel criticises the AstraZeneca vaccine — the one the UK government rolled out first and foremost — highlighting how BBC presenter Lisa Shaw died of complications relating to AstraZeneca:

She then goes on to insist people should ask questions of the vaccines:

However, several months after the AstraZeneca criticism, in December 2021, she goes back to repeating how great the vaccine rollout is. How quickly Lisa Shaw was forgotten!

So what prompted Isabel Oakeshott to potentially ‘leak’ these WhatsApp messages, besides the Midazolam Murders?

Bad sales.

Isabel Oakeshott published Matt Hancock’s book on the back of his little publicity stunt in ‘I’m a celebrity, get me out of here’, to frankly, a fizzled reception:

There were only 44 likes, and it is doubtful any of them resulted in a sales conversion. Oakeshott found out that brownnosing to an extremely unpopular man is very unprofitable. One individual had this curt reply:

It was rumoured Oakeshott offered to work on the book for free. So no sales, meant no payment. Oakeshott wasn’t exactly an established, known or credible author with a big following, and one suspects she imagined herself rolling in the big money upon publishing such a book, only to be met with the disappointment of 44 likes and hardly any sales. Such is the experience of working also on Substack.

Much easier, then, to just publish whatever she was given to stir up a controversy, and indirectly draw attention to her failing book to generate sales. After all, it wasn’t the first time she published entrusted files resulting in someone getting removed.

But to do so would require she bury the parts about Midazolam Matt and the Bungled Crew working to kill the elderly, otherwise she’d be guilty of writing the book of a mass murderer for free. Not exactly a good look. And remember, she opted to write the book and publish it first, rather than warn the public.

Money came before public interest; it was only after the money didn’t materialise did she flip. Doesn’t she know government goons won't be saved?

The irony in all this? Oakeshott was working to perpetuate the very lies she now is claiming to ‘expose’.

All-in-all, a fairweather friend.

---

Subscribe to get more content from The Daily Beagle.

Learned something new? Think others could learn?

And leave a comment.