EMA Leaks: Trial Site News Finds Pfizer Likely Committed Fraud
EMA Leaks: Trial Site News Finds Pfizer Likely Committed Fraud
Opening the legal floodgates to full (de facto part 3)
Disclaimer: This does not constitute legal advice. Speak with a legal professional.
Trial Site News has become one of the only outlets to go into depth on the EMA leaks, exploring various documents and the consequences therein.
In one very detailed article — props to Trial Site News — they explain how the documents show evidence they likely falsified key data.
Certain independent scientific experts have described these Western blots as the “smoking gun” evidence (particularly the “duplication” of the results) which suggest that BioNTech and Pfizer falsified key data as part of their submissions to the European Medicines Agency and the Federal Drugs Agency for securing emergency use authorisation (conditional) and later marketing authorisation approval of their product.
What Trial Site News are referring to here, is #blotgate.
#blotgate was a term coined by Jikkyleaks, who is an anonymous mouse poster on Twitter who clearly has scientific chops. It refers to the “blots” found on the datasets shown above. Jessica Rose has also written about it to a limited extent.
As the ‘Stark Naked Brief’ comments:
The Daily Beagle does not profess to have the scientific knowledge to interpret, but our understanding is the blots show a specific spike protein formation (we believe one without a poly-A tail?) that is not possible for the spike protein to hold. A bit like half an Eiffel tower floating in midair. More on poly-A tails can be found here.
That is to say, the ‘blot’ datasets showing a ‘stable’ spike protein look like fabrications in the eyes of the scientific community. How can we be sure? Well…
Trial Site News Covers Tail Truncation
The Daily Beagle back in January covered the evidence in the documents showing that the spike proteins were becoming ‘truncated’ (read: cut-off, shortened) resulting in unstable mRNA.
Trial Site News have now also covered this, highlighting additionally that an EMA rolling review commented that BioNTech (the mRNA manufacturers working on behalf of Pfizer), had failed to characterise the spike proteins (read: they did not give the EMA sufficient technical data):
A severe deficiency of the characterisation section is that no biological characterisation is presented and that the mode of action is not described.
This quote is found in the ‘Rapporteur Rolling Review Report Overview LoQ - COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BioNTech.docx’ document under the ‘02. Rapporteur's (SE) AR’ folder.
That is to say, BioNTech were evasive and vague about how exactly their spike proteins work, if even at all.
This suggests that BioNTech did not actually have any working spike protein, given they clearly did not know how it worked, and thus lied to the corrupt regulators — who did not challenge the lie — regarding how the spike protein ‘worked’ — or in this case, didn’t, and even sped through development.
Meaning fabrications were used to justify getting emergency authorisation.
This Opens The Door To Fraud
At this point the evidence of fraud and malfaesance is overwhelming:
We have the Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla lying to the FDA head of biologics Peter Marks (which is also a conflict of interest given the close ties).
Project Veritas has the Pfizer R&D Director admitting to mutating viruses in secret, only to later for him to falsely claim he had lied, only for Pfizer then to write an admission that they were mutating viruses, something they knew they were doing and did not disclose previously.
We have Peter Doshi, editor of the BMJ, asking why the raw data proving the 95% effectiveness claim has not been released for peer review (read: there’s no evidence to back up their claim).
Rob Roos, minister for European Parliament, got Pfizer to admit they never conducted any transmissibility tests, and therefore they lied on their claims it prevents spread.
None of the pharmaceutical companies nor health regulators wanted to disclose what the acceptability criteria were for the shots, meaning it was accepted on fraudulent grounds.
No pharmaceutical company has disclosed nor explained the issue of mRNA instability to the public, nor made any mention of the risks associated when selling the product, and are therefore fraudulently withholding known information.
The FOIA lawsuit document that the FDA fought tooth and nail not to release, that from page 30 onwards, shows walls of text of adverse reactions to the shots that was not willingly disclosed to the public.
The over 800 studies and more showing harms that are being completely ignored.
Plus evidence of a mechanism for blood clots that Pfizer won’t admit to nor warn people of.
There are many more instances highlighting fraud, omission of crucial evidence, falsified claims and more.
The Law Won’t Protect Them
At this point it opens the floodgates for lawsuits, as previously discussed on The Daily Beagle:
Part 1 of why pharmaceutical companies are not immune show protections don’t apply in ‘willful misconduct’ under PREP Act, and;
Part 2 shows the PREP Act is fundamentally Unconstitutional anyway and could be overturned with a concerted legal effort.
At this stage, it is now down to Americans with deep pockets and good lawyers, and eager-beaver States, to lead the charge. The opening has presented itself, and you will never get another opportunity like this to reform both the judicial system and healthcare in the United States.
Subscribe to The Daily Beagle to get more content like this.
Think others could learn something new?
And leave a comment below (be sure to leave a like):