or take the first pathologist who CAREFULLY investigated >80 bodies of DECEASED VICTIMS AFTER the covid shots... As soon as he testifies in front of EU parliament and shows black on white that 75-80% of the covid injections were DIRECTLY involved in DEATH of these deceased, he dies during swimming.... I'm talking about Prof. Arne Burkhardt from Germany:
I like how you point out the way the fact-wreckers bully people.
Magafuli tested a fruit, a goat, motor oil, and other weird things with the official pcr test and they all came back positive, so he threw the WHO out of his country. He was a PhD chemist and very loved by his people and other Africans.
just noticed one thing. I posted a comment here about other similar cases this post is touching, and quite few people liked it, BUT thedailybeagle didn't. This is NOT to beg thedailybeagle for one like, it is about TRUTH, for me... I wonder WHY the dailybeagle does NOT like my content? Is it because I self-advertise and point to my substack? Or something else related to the content?? Am always trying to check every fact before writing anything down, from multiple sources, in different languages.. And when something is still wrong I correct it. So since sub-stack is NOT very truth friendly platform in general (my opinion, while subscribing only to those who seem to be nearest the truth), just wonder, if liking 'self-advertisement' is not encouraged here?
If I was opposed to self-advertisement, I'd ban it outright.
I'm also far too acutely aware of discredit-by-association attempts. A truthseeker wouldn't care if they got approval or not - but if they had the freedom to speak out. Which you do.
I also don't follow popularism trends, so, yes, 15 people giving you a like does not equate to a like from myself. If I'm not sure what I think about a comment, I typically refrain from liking it. You speak of an individual I'm not familiar with, so I don't know - independently - what the case details are, so I don't know if I agree with your assessment or not. I don't have the time to evaluate it, and you would know pretty quickly if I disagreed.
Don't force words into my mouth based on inaction, thanks.
or take the first pathologist who CAREFULLY investigated >80 bodies of DECEASED VICTIMS AFTER the covid shots... As soon as he testifies in front of EU parliament and shows black on white that 75-80% of the covid injections were DIRECTLY involved in DEATH of these deceased, he dies during swimming.... I'm talking about Prof. Arne Burkhardt from Germany:
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/the-last-messages-from-the-covid19
just few out of MANY!!!!!!!!! Or take Dr. Rashid Buttar, the personal MD of RF Kennedy Jr.....
I like how you point out the way the fact-wreckers bully people.
Magafuli tested a fruit, a goat, motor oil, and other weird things with the official pcr test and they all came back positive, so he threw the WHO out of his country. He was a PhD chemist and very loved by his people and other Africans.
You do great posts! Keep at it, Beagle!
I wonder which nation took them out. Us or one of them.
In the case of Haiti, I'm pretty sure it was the United States. I mean, it is their backyard, after all.
The others, I'm guessing might be Israel or Europe. Cui Bono.
just noticed one thing. I posted a comment here about other similar cases this post is touching, and quite few people liked it, BUT thedailybeagle didn't. This is NOT to beg thedailybeagle for one like, it is about TRUTH, for me... I wonder WHY the dailybeagle does NOT like my content? Is it because I self-advertise and point to my substack? Or something else related to the content?? Am always trying to check every fact before writing anything down, from multiple sources, in different languages.. And when something is still wrong I correct it. So since sub-stack is NOT very truth friendly platform in general (my opinion, while subscribing only to those who seem to be nearest the truth), just wonder, if liking 'self-advertisement' is not encouraged here?
If I was opposed to self-advertisement, I'd ban it outright.
I'm also far too acutely aware of discredit-by-association attempts. A truthseeker wouldn't care if they got approval or not - but if they had the freedom to speak out. Which you do.
I also don't follow popularism trends, so, yes, 15 people giving you a like does not equate to a like from myself. If I'm not sure what I think about a comment, I typically refrain from liking it. You speak of an individual I'm not familiar with, so I don't know - independently - what the case details are, so I don't know if I agree with your assessment or not. I don't have the time to evaluate it, and you would know pretty quickly if I disagreed.
Don't force words into my mouth based on inaction, thanks.
No offence, but I'm not interested in being datamined to submit a worthless piece of paper a bunch of tyrants are going to ignore anyway.
Just short of overthrow, they're not going to change their minds or their positions.
They slaughter children wholesale.
Do you honestly think a non-threatening piece of paper is going to bother their conscience in the slightest?
The fact you deleted your own comment once I called it out as datamining tells me all I need to know.
Imagine thinking a piece of paper is 'do something'.
No, the alternative is overthrow, like I said.