Canada Will Jail You Over Crimes You Might Commit
Draconian dystopian tyranny is here
Justin Trudeau's Uniparty Liberal so-called 'justice' minister Arif Virani says he will put people under house arrest on the mere suspicion they may commit a future “hate crime”. The globalist tyrant claims it is to "help" deradicalise people who are "learning things online". Cannot be educated, prole.
Naturally, the tyrannical leader uses edge case scenarios implying shootings at synagogues, but reading further it is clear the intention is to abuse members of the general public over speech, including comedians and jokes.
It only requires a perception. Not an actual harm, the mere perception of it.
In a thinly veiled gaslighting attempt, the minister lies and claims it won’t “undermine freedom of speech”, even though that is clear that is exactly what it does.
Globe And Mail Re-writes Propaganda After Backlash
So tyrannical was this bill, that the propaganda outlet Globe and Mail radically rewrote their own version of this horrifying story in order to downplay the consequences on freedom.
Notice the radically revised version does not say it is ‘edited’. They attempt to trojan horse their tyrannical control freak bill by trying to pretend it will ‘protect the kids’.
This is the same government that implements child genital mutilation, has State-sponsored murder of children for depression (see also Kanada's Aktion T4), and rolled out the harmful poison shots then tried to cover it up.
What is the difference between the Globe and Mail two wildly different versions?
The first version admits there is an Orwellian ‘oversight committee’ designed to control speech online, but even that revision is tepid:
The article also claims Muslims will be outraged by this bill; which is gone in the second version. This is likely in relation to outrage at the Gaza war, which you’ll see later in this article (curiously as a minority their concerns get ignored entirely later on when it doesn’t suit the tyrannical narrative).
The second version omits the tyrannical censorship aspect entirely and wholly focuses on the claim the paedophile-filled government will use the bill to stop online child porn. They even regurgitate the blatant government lie it “isn’t” censorship:
Uniparty Conservatives pretend to condemn this Orwellian agenda, but they push a similar version of this: online digital ID which will be used to track and identify dissenters against the state, hidden under the guise of supposedly protecting children (amazing how globalists re-use the same trick, isn’t it?).
It is a litmus paper test; if the public accept it here, and it “works”, then they can papercut their way to control of social media outlets via “age verification”. Uniparty Conservative US States are already aiming to implement it. The State wants to co-parent what you and your child can and cannot do online.
It isn't the job of the state to police your children - the state can't even police themselves. That duty falls to the parents. And if the parents can’t control the kids, then neither can the State.
UK Draconian Echoes
Canada's so-called "Online Harms Act" bill echoes the lockstep Orwellian “Online Safety Act” implemented within the UK, even echoing similar naming - and the same excuses. ‘Won’t someone please think of the children’ — as they destroy children’s futures by taking away free speech and implementing poison shot mandates.
Proving it has nothing to do with children, Globe and Mail trotted out another contradictory gaslighting piece where they feared so-called “haters” would dare escape their tyrannical overreach onto “smaller platforms”, posing their own media propaganda as supposedly the voice of “minorities”.
In reality, it is the self-appointed self-proclaimed egotistical so-called “advocates” for minorities — are not the “minorities” themselves. Instead, it looks more like foreign interest groups, trying to prohibit overseas criticism of the Gaza war, from emerging (hence the earlier objections by Muslims):
The article goes on to further reveal the Canadian government wants to also censor US based content providers such as Gab, by trying to trot out the usual ‘white supremacists’ and ‘far right’ narrative.
Remember, this is a bill they’re trying to gaslight you on as being ‘only’ about child porn and supposedly ‘isn’t about censorship’.
Guilty Of A Future Crime You Didn’t Commit
The thought police no longer need you to be found guilty in a court of law for an actual crime, the mere possibility of you thinking of a future crime is sufficient. Cast a thought back to the UK woman arrested and charged (now dropped) for merely holding a thought of a prayer outside a child murder ('abortion') facility. If globalists charge for prayer, they will charge more so for dissent.
The Canadian government, who trample elderly women, uses so-called “terrorist” legislation to freeze the bank accounts of everyday truckers peacefully protesting, after abusing power and giving itself “emergency powers”, legalises hard drugs, and has murdered over 30,000 people under MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) which they continually expand (trying to include poverty as justification), after rolling out massively harmful vaccine mandates, and forcing dissenting members of the public into mandatory re-education training and compelled speech…
…has the temerity to berate you, the public, on hate, violence, intimidation, bullying and child abuse, and expects you to fall hook, link and sinker for their Orwellian Minority Report pre-crime bill?
We don’t think so. Let us know what you think dear reader.
Related Articles To Read
UK Government Spying On Innocents' Bank Accounts | Cash Is King
Health Canada Admits Plasmids In mRNA Shots Are Real [They Don’t Care]
Found this informative?
Help inform?
Thoughts, dear reader?
It is, indeed, getting very scary up here. The bill also contains an ex post facto clause. So if you ever said anything on the internet and they find it hateful....
It's a crazy world. Bad enough down here in the US, but I feel for freedom-minded Canadians. I considered myself a liberal years back, but have to wonder what I was thinking. As a fantasy writer, I've seen that many authors are easily tricked into believing whatever they are told. This is strange to me when I've always considered writers to be thinkers. Thinking through the ramifications of what these anti-freedom policies will lead to (like a real-world 1984) should be right up their alley, and yet...