Rutgers University Exposed: Self-Profiteering Vaccine Mandates [Update]

Richard Ebright Blocks The Daily Beagle after Rutgers conflict of interest gets caught

Credit: Thanks to Joycap for assistance in retrieving Tweets. Feel free to check out their Substack here which they self-describe as “dumb articles about gaming”.

Update: The section on ‘honorific’ ‘titles’ has been updated to confirm they are job positions, not titles.

Previously, The Daily Beagle wrote a polite rebuttal to Richard Ebright regarding his stance on vaccine mandates. People remarked he was not deserving of this politeness given his stance. This was his ultimate response:

Politeness proves our point; the blocks were not due to name calling or ‘trolling’. In-fact, Richard Ebright verbally abused The Daily Beagle:

They even spammed the same verbal abuse twice.

Then there’s this gem:

“Pro-facts” Richard Ebright clearly does not follow the evidence; nor does he present any. He’s unable refute the points raised. He had no glib remark about us abusing him to fall back on to flimsily justify a block, instead done quiet, in the dark.

Ironically, Richard Ebright went on to remark in May 2nd 2023 — the time The Daily Beagle started raising the questions — that the ‘need for vaccine mandates has ended’:

Despite this, the vaccine tyrant Ebright was recalcitrant of his position, and insisted the government should have implemented it more broadly, and that unvaccinated people should not be rehired:

Rutgers University — where Ebright works — however has a financial conflict of interest. One so large, it provoked a verbal denial from the otherwise silent and avoidant Ebright, who then promptly blocked The Daily Beagle for raising the issue of Conflicts of Interest at Rutgers. Curious, no?

The Daily Beagle Queries Richard Ebright

We asked about Richard Ebright being on the ‘Board of Governors’, as well as highlighting his work on RNA transcription (note: pages may look the same but they are distinct, note the URL):

Richard Ebright declared ‘Board of Governors’ as an “honorary academic title”. Odd, isn’t Board of Governors a strictly regulated term? When is a Board of Governors not a Board of Governors? When Richard Ebright is on it, apparently.

---

Update: It turns out ‘Board of Governors’ are a temporary job position:

The line “Board of Governors Professorships are not permanent positions” implies they are, of course, temporary positions, and are not purely ‘honorific’. The fact they ‘cease to exist’ after the person leaves makes it a job, not a title.

In contrast, “honorific” PhDs, or “honorific” competition awards don’t magically disappear after you leave a university. Just ask Jill Biden.

---

He then claimed we were confusing “RNA” with “RNA vaccines”, but the message doesn’t mention “RNA vaccines”, but “RNA transcription”, which can be used for a variety of purposes; including in RNA used in shots.

It’s a bit like him saying he ‘works in tyres, not in cars’. One would see tyres as a component of cars. It doesn’t refute what we’re saying.

Ebright Squeals Under Questioning

Richard Ebright is on Rutgers University Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Board of Governors. He is a ‘molecular biologist’. Given how well known in media he is, it is no doubt he had sway over Rutgers University’s policy decisionmaking.

Richard Ebright insisted he had “no influence”, but it isn’t clear how someone with his level of influence in media doesn’t have influence on policymaking, both at Rutgers and in general:

As you’ve probably deduced, Rutgers University demanded all university students comply with the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ mandates.

Rutgers University even shilled imaginary support for the vaccine mandates was “high”:

However, it was so problematic, several students filed a lawsuit against it.

The piecemeal lawsuit (as typical from CHD), was not successful.

Rutgers University had a profit motive for doing this… selling their own COVID-19 ‘vaccine’:

The Daily Beagle challenged Richard Ebright on this evident conflict of interest, but he simply said it had “no connection” to him.

When pressed further, Richard Ebright then issued a lawyer-speak sounding denial, where he tried to cast doubt that Rutgers had any idea of what was going on in regards to either himself, the COVID-19 shots they were developing, or the mandates they themselves enacted, which is patently absurd, and sounds like a thinly veiled attempt to possibly head off a lawsuit.

It’d be like if Kelloggs Cornflakes mandated you buy breakfast cereal at work. Sounds monopolistic in practice to us.

It was shortly after this highlight Richard Ebright blocked The Daily Beagle, no doubt trying to evade further scrutiny.

Rutgers University Stands To Profit From Vaccine Mandates

This article discussing their work on a “novel” COVID-19 shot (called MT-001), mentions a department in particular… Molecular Biology. The same field of which Richard Ebright studies in.

Then there’s this particularly serious line; the US government’s National Institutes of Health want an antibody for every protein in your body; destroy all the proteins!

We’re pretty sure they’re aware the human body is made up of proteins and has naturally occurring, beneficial proteins. An antibody for every protein in the human body? Sounds like they’re trying to kill us off.

Then There’s Aluminium Toxicity

What’s the trick? Well, Rutgers’ MT-001 shot contains, surprise, aluminium (American: aluminum):

An ‘adjuvant’ is something that increases (in our view: worsens) immune response. It causes what is known as ‘ASIA syndrome’ (ASIA; Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants):

Autoimmunity is where your own immune system attacks your own body.

Aluminium in the body is harmful regardless. Rutgers knows this. Anyone with a basic understanding of toxicology understands this. Especially someone who also works in chemical biology.

Even aluminium drinks cans have plastic linings, albeit due to corrosion. Wouldn’t want to scare off the fizzy pop drinkers, now, would we?

Too much aluminium in the body is known as Aluminium toxicosis, and stop us if you’ve heard of any of these harms before:

Myocarditis? Thrombosis? Amyloidogenesis? Breast Cancer? Infertility? Hepatorenal disease (liver and kidney damage)?

A 36 year multi-centre (American: center) cohort study found aluminium associated with neurological degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease:

Another study, titled “Natural and Synthetic Neurotoxins in Our Environment: From Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)”, notes “extremely negative reaction” to aluminium “in vaccines administered with an aluminium adjuvant”:

Clearly, then, aluminium in the bloodstream is an extremely bad idea. But here’s Rutgers, forcing it upon people and sticking it into their poison shots.

How surprising that those advocating for ‘vaccine mandates’ are the ones with the most to financially gain from them, all whilst causing others huge detrimental harms.

Are you surprised, dear reader?

---

Twitter hates the truth and suppresses Substack. Subscribe free to bypass censorship!

Expose the conflicts of interest!

Got more information to add? Leave a comment below!