What Justifications For Exemptions Are There?

In response to Igor Chudov

Note: Still dealing with bereavement, please forgive this ‘rush job’ article.

Disclaimer: This article does not constitute legal advice, speak with a legal professional.

Igor Chudov recently posted asking for examples of religious grounds to file an exemption for the poison shots:

Whilst replying with a short Tweet (that would ultimately be suppressed by Twitter) was considered, it serves as a better opportunity for a wider training and understanding exercise on what beliefs-based exemptions might exist in relation to vaccines.

Normally, as a paid publication, we don’t feel it is appropriate to touch religious topics, however as this falls firmly within the domain of the shots, we will be covering this. We will also be covering beliefs that may not strictly be a religion, but could be interpreted as such.

Given there are many subsects of religious groups, we’ll be focusing on individual beliefs, rather than trying to dissect every possible group.

What Exemptions Can There Be?

This does not intend to be an exhaustive list.

Christianity

Objection to: child murder (abortion)/child sacrifice/killing (Pacifism + variants)

A Pfizer whistleblower went on record to state that Pfizer’s shots make use of unborn baby (‘fetal’) cells.

Murdered baby cells such as HEK (human embryonic kidney. Read: kidney cells taken from an unborn human) variants are often used by the pharmaceutical industry (typically HEK293).

This includes the AstraZeneca shot:

How they might counter:

Those ‘approving’ exemptions may attempt to find actions of hypocrisy, such as support for war, murder or the use of guns (for ‘pacifists’), or the use of medicines that contain or use HEK (for those opposed to child murder). If notified of HEK-containing medicines, simply inform them you weren’t aware and will be ceasing the use of such a product.

Objection to: Another’s Blood

Some sects of Christianity believe that they cannot accept blood transfusions, which may also extend to that of human cells, or products produced from human cells. For example, Jehovah’s Witnesses quote various Bible passages countermanding any consumption of blood (whilst HEK cells are not strictly blood, cells were not a mentioned concept in the Bible, and it could be argued it is a more broad definition).

How they might counter:

Similarly to the earlier objection: if one has received a blood transfusion, or is okay with, or donates blood, or even an organ transplant, or has consumed a medicine that makes use of said blood, then it is grounds by which they might object. That of course, presumes they have access to your medical history.

Islam

Objection to: consuming Halal meats/consuming Haaram food

The AstraZeneca shot was produced both via the use of chimpanzee cells — which is a non-Halal meat — and via the use of human cells (HEK). As noted with the Pfizer shot, they also use HEK cells. Consumption of human meat is considered Haaram in the Quran. It could therefore be strongly considered injection is a type of consumption, and therefore injection of human cells Haaram.

How they might counter:

Reportedly there may be exemptions to non-Halal foods, but it seems to be denomination/sect based. Some sects may argue risking death by rejecting non-Halal foods (for example, in lifesaving medicine; insulin from pigs is a prime example) is more Haaram than consuming the non-Halal food (so chimpanzee cells might get a free pass). However, the Quran clearly denounces the consumption of human flesh; some sects may still choose to ignore this depending on interpretation.

Most non-Islamists however won’t be aware of this, and you can simply identify as a domination that considers consumption of human flesh to Haaram regardless of circumstance.

Judaism

Objection to: Non-Kosher food

The Torah is pretty strict in the interpretation of what foods are and are not Kosher. Whilst some Rabbis may debate highly technical interpretations for specific animal species as to whether or not they are Kosher, one thing is clear: consumption of human flesh is not.

How they might counter:

Similar to Islam regarding Halal foods, some sects of Judaism also create exemptions for non-Kosher foods, for example in emergencies (pig insulin being one such example). However, stricter forms do not. This presumes a high risk of death, which if you’re reading this, is highly unlikely.

Atheism

Objection to: Whatever the heck you feel like.

Atheism has invented various concepts, such as the flying spaghetti monster and Pastafarianism, which involves wearing a pasta strainer on your head. So chances are you could literally make up whatever excuse you wanted — such as a decree from the flying spaghetti monster itself commanding you not to take the shots (earmark it as a protest movement if it requires qualifying).

How they might counter:

They might contend this isn’t a mainstream ‘religion’, or that your particular belief isn’t mainstream, however Pastafarians got their pasta sieve headwear accepted on passport photos (only typically doable if what you’re doing is seen as a religion), although the Netherlands took exception to this, Americans very likely have First Amendment rights to invent whatever kind of religion they want, although this might require some sort of legal action.

Veganism

Depending on how far you take your veganism, it may actually qualify as a type of ‘religion’, or more blandly, a ‘philosophical belief’ (which for UK purposes is a sort of ‘religion without the bells and whistles’).

For those thinking of just quickly adopting veganism; it doesn’t quite work that way for UK purposes. Your entire life has to revolve around the concept of it to count as a philosophical belief.

Objection to: Animal testing/Use of animals/Non-plant products (E.G. HEK)

Given nearly everything in the pharmaceutical industry makes use of animal testing (which if you’ve seen what Fauci did with the beagles and sandfleas, is actually quite horrific), this is a near universal.

Pfizer have (supposedly) conducted experiments on mice, and as noted earlier, the AstraZeneca shot makes use of chimpanzee cells — which naturally also means animal testing/animal sacrifice.

How they might counter:

People who are not vegans often confuse vegetarianism (which permits the consumption of animal produce, such as milk and eggs) with veganism (which prohibits any sort of animal product entirely), and may incorrectly object on the basis of this misinterpretation.

They may also attempt to ‘slap down’ veganism on the grounds it’s not technically a religion, and it will be on the individual’s own merits and adoption that determines if it is or isn’t. I’ve personally used this to successfully reject any involvement in vaccine rollout twice without getting fired.

African-Centric Religions

Too many to name, and too much of a tinderbox to choose a grouping, you’ll have to forgive the wording as the pandering fence sitting it is. Boo, neutrality!

Objection to: Historic oppression of black people

The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (being whitewashed as the ‘Tuskegee Syphilis Study’), was an experiment conducted on black people by the murderously ironic Public Health Service, a US government agency, that ran the experiment from 1932 and 1972 (40 years!).

Black people were given injections containing Syphilis, but weren’t told this (they were merely informed it was some beneficial medicine, and told to sign consent forms they could not read).

They were monitored to see how the disease progressed, and maliciously denied treatment, which included getting doctors at other clinics not to treatment, and preventing them from being referred to other services, or even from leaving the area (most were too poor to leave).

Such an abusive experiment involving injections (lets face it, this isn’t the first time the US government have conducted unethical medical experiments) has severe moral and ethical implications, and as a result, any member of any Black or African-centric religions (or even beliefs or groups), would be well within their means and rights to reject the shots on the historic grounds of distrust and dishonesty by the US government, as part of their belief system.

How they might counter:

Given the government are classically staffed with unfeeling psychopaths who don’t care how many people they kill or maim, they may even attempt to object to this, trying to argue you should trust the government or that the ‘shots save lives’ (which is what they told the Tuskegee participants as well before they all died slow, horrible deaths).

You could push back and say they are reinforcing such systemic oppression by failing to accept your viewpoint (and maybe offer a protest or two to raise awareness).

Multiple Beliefs?

If you’ve got multiple beliefs that would grant an exemption, pick the ones you think the schools administrators will personally resonate and agree with. If you don’t think they will agree with any, pick the one you most strongly follow, as it will motivate you to stand your ground more strongly.

‘Wallet Religion’

There is one thing all schools universally worship, more strongly than any other religion, and that’s money.

Every pupil they lose a placement on, means less funding for their school. Usually, but not always, schools are assigned funding on a ‘per head’ and ‘per attendance’ basis.

This means, they get money for every student enrolled, and they continue to get money for each student in attendance. This is why schools hate granting vacation or permission to leave, because it comes out of their budget; it is also why they’re more concerned with attendance rates rather than quality of schoolwork.

As a result, pointing out you will withdraw the student (meaning they make a loss financially) until their beliefs are supported is a valid low-key threat.

Some countries make parents liable for student non-attendance, so alternatively you can offer to place them in another school or you can try homeschooling. If you’ve got money for it, you could always hire a private tutor.

Risk Factor

It is also worth considering that any schools that tries to mandate shots, will attempt to inject your child without your permission when your back is turned anyway (usually by conditioning the child into going and getting it); because they have devolved into the Cult of Vaccine, underhanded tactics like brute force and deception are acceptable to them.

So even if they accept your exemption request… they will more than likely try to subvert it anyway.

Readers are invited to submit their own exemption request suggestions in the comments below.

---

Don’t subscribe.

Don’t share.

Don’t leave a comment below.