The last point is very important - make sure your children are on the same page with you, and understand how extremely stupid, evil and dangerous the idea of vaccination is. Many parents want to shield their children from what they think will frighten them - like the knowledge that the school wants them dead, or maimed and sterilized by pushing this policy. I believe kids are resilient, smart and resourceful, and the only way to ensure this is by telling them the truth. We should not shield them from the truth, no matter how scary the current situation. They are our only hope to fix this madness in the future. Having an open dialogue inside the family is key. You cannot be there shielding them 100% of the time, so they must practice facing the evil and being not afraid, staring with the school administration.
Sasha the most difficult thing in my life was to expose the demonic, evil, wicked system that we live in to my daughter, I did this out of unconditional love. It breaks my 💔 to see & feel her pain every day. God bless you & may God protect you always. ❤🙏❤🙏❤🙏🇬🇧
Also depends on age, though, that "resiliant, smart" thing. I remember research suggesting that peer groups have larger influence in children/adolescents than parents, IIRC Steven Pinker mention that, next to genetics.
But perhaps that is even more reason to try to explain things to them in an as comprehensive way as possible, to, immunize them, as it were, to typical uninformed arguments they may encounter from peers, teachers etc.
That gets even more important as talking kids into being "trans" becomes a thing...
Kids must be prepared against emotional manipulation.
The reason peer groups typically have larger influence on children is because parents don't tell them the truth and treat them as children, while their friends treat them as equals.
I would have thought a simple exemption is that 'Vaccines contain poisons and I don't believe in poisoning myself as poisoning has never been good for one's health.'
That would be a scientific/medical exemption. In a functional society, simply saying 'no' to any medical procedure would be valid grounds. It would be in my book.
The problem is you're arguing with to people who are unwilling to look at medical evidence (either due to guilt, complicity or profit motive), and don't provide you any space to present any.evidence of harms.
I've never liked the idea of 'exemptions' because it's essentially asking for approval from someone else in order to follow your own beliefs. In my case I didn't even file an exemption, when asked to work on a vaccine project, I flatly said 'no' because of my beliefs.
You really only need one and that's lack of informed consent for an experimental treatment which legally it was and now it's quite clear that there was a bait and switch
Lack of informed consent would be a legal objection, and you're punching way above the paygrades of the lackeys (who will be completely oblivious as to the law) who rubbestamp the approval for the *religious* exemptions.
The 'bait and switch' you refer to is product fraud, which this in my humble non-legal opinion it definitely is, given they sold it as a vaccine, but in reality it is a gene modification shot by the payload of evidence from Pfizer & Co.
A legal route would of course, necessitate litigation, which for people with not much in the way of finances or time, would not be practical. This of course presumes the local court system isn't rife with Vaccine Cultists, which in some States they're swarming with (such as California).
Trust me...at that time there were attorneys reviewing those things behind the scenes and they knew full well the injunctions would follow suit as well as the lawsuits which are just beginning now. We need PROSECUTIONS though at the local level though. Federal is out of reach now because of Biden DOJ.
Under Title 7 and RFRA, the lack of informed consent can have a spiritual context and I cited as much in my exemption request. Also, the bait and switch was ILLEGAL period. Also, legally the pfizer vaxx is considered a medical countermeasure and NOT A PHARMACEUTICAL as such it was not subject to withdrawl by the FDA but rather BARDA which is military. 21 USC 360 BBB which is what drove Judge Truncale to dismiss the Brook Jackson false claims act against Pfizer who is nothing but a contractor for the DoD in this context.
Trust me...at that time there were attorneys reviewing those things behind the scenes and they knew full well the injunctions would follow suit as well as the lawsuits which are just beginning now. We need PROSECUTIONS though at the local level though. Federal is out of reach now because of Biden DOJ.
Igor, the drilled-down, root of this is the very basic question of belief in either the Superiority of God....or the Superiority of man. All so-called "vaccines' are a result of man playing god, believing that God somehow messed up in the creation of the innate immune system, and that man must "fix" that with his drugs and chemicals. You either believe in Nature (which is a name for the physical expression of God here on the Earth plane)....or you believe in "science"...which has actually become a religion; scientism. That's it. That's all you need. Scriptures and references to the Catechism are secondary and can be used as examples of how organized religions command certain behaviors and call for the rejection of idol worship (of which the Cadeuceus is a symbol) but what it all comes down to is the ability to articulate this fundamental concept. This was what I explained when I was asked to clarify my religious exemption, and I was met with a thunderous silence after I finished speaking, before the challenger quietly acknowledged me, and ended the call.
- In my case, it didn't matter. I worked for the State of Massachusetts, and there were no religious exemptions allowed in any agency all across the board; this make it very clear that these people were all working in concert to get rid of everyone not in their cult, and that they didn't care who knew that they had no intention of following their own laws. I informed the director of the executive office of health and human services that they were required to provide religious accommodations, and she informed me IN WRITING that the law does not apply to them.
It certainly is; the system that is on clear display out there right now is corrupt, lawless, rotten and anti-life, and it must be completely dismantled. It is unredeemable, and those who are embedded within it must go, as they have aided and abetted its ability to keep humanity inslaved and our collective state of consciousness low.
- Scientism has as its ultimate goal human augmentation and the elimination of our connection to the Divine. If you haven't read Thomas Mayer, a contemporary of Rudolph Steiner, I highly recommend him!
The larger...and more important...question is why are colleges and universities still requiring the dangerous and useless covid jabs? Are they receiving money?
Although I understand the impulse to seek an exception, you are furthering the insanity and participating in the lie.
There are plenty of colleges and universities in the US that never required or no longer require the jabs. Choose a different school. Defer a year if you have to. Most of the so-called elite schools have been revealed as pointless indoctrination centers.
I attended a small, private college in Pennsylvania (Bucknell). When I learned they were requiring the jabs, I told them I would never send another dime. Last summer and this summer, they reached out to graduates to leave notes of encouragement to incoming students and new graduates. I told the incoming students they shouldn't attend a school that requires dangerous and unnecessary gene therapy injections they didn't need. I told the recent graduates they shouldn't have taken the shots. I'm certain my special message of encouragement will not be shared.
If we try to play by their rules, they will continue.
"Although I understand the impulse to seek an exception, you are furthering the insanity and participating in the lie."
That would be Igor's choice, and his being in Illinois, I doubt there's a non-mandate school in the region (although if anyone has any suggestions, be sure to let Igor know). In an ideal world he'd homeschool, but given both his full time job and his Substack (and I don't presume him to have a partner), I doubt he has time for it. That means he has to jump through the hoops of this crooked system.
In my case, I wasn't even offered an exemption. I just said no, then implied any attempt to force me or fire me would be an attack on my beliefs (UK has anti-discrimination laws). My manager tried a second time, said no, he threatened a write up, I said he can go ahead if he wants but I'm sticking with my beliefs. No write-up materialised.
"why are colleges and universities still requiring the dangerous and useless covid jabs? Are they receiving money?"
Yes. Not in the sense of US gov grants, but in the sense of pharmaceutical profits.
Rutgers, for example, are working on their own SARS-CoV-2 shot (to the point it resulted in Rutgers' Richard Ebright blocking me):
Yes. I understand it's Igor's decision. This article, while inspired by his tweet, is directed at everyone. I can't tell if Igor is concerned about a mandate to attend high school or a college or university in Illinois. Illinois did not require a covid jab for the 2022-2023 school year for K-12. I can't find a final decision on the upcoming school year. The article below suggests it won't happen, but that could have changed.
Igor does have a partner. He's written about her before. If his son is in a science/tech/mathematics discipline, it would be very difficult to home school at the high school level but not impossible.
Yes. I'm sure schools are still taking cash from pharma companies. Are they still receiving cash from the federal government, though? That seemed to be the main driver for many schools.
I was fortunate. My children graduated from college right before the insanity started. My son's school went full covidian. My daughter attended JHU...the entrance to hell. So, I consider myself very fortunate that they weren't forced to inject. My nephew (who had Covid in September 2020) took the first two shots and had to take the booster to graduate from Boston College. I was furious, but my brother (his father) was a covidian at the time. All three of my nephews and my niece took the injections. They were not forced. Their parents thought is was the right thing to do, which really shocked me. They've all had at least three shots. One of my nephews and my niece may have had more...'cause their parents are still nuts.
I understand the difficulty, but the monster will continue as long as people fold. If you want to protect your health and your fertility, you may have to make difficult choices or get creative in your workarounds.
"Are they still receiving cash from the federal government, though?"
Good question, and if it's a public school, it will obviously be State or Federally funded.
"This article, while inspired by his tweet, is directed at everyone"
It is, as there are likely more people in Igor's position with similarity.
If I felt people had money (which, as someone who doesn't, would be hypocritical), I would advise them to "simply" move to a State or Country that still respects their medical rights and freedoms, or at least towards a less repressive school or local county with favourable attitudes.
Even presuming money, some may be tied to friends and family in the area. I watched Louis Rossmann (Right to Repair YouTuber) struggle to find a new place after New York City kept politically prosecuting him (and he was a Democrat voter!), despising the heat of Texas and the humid heat of Florida. Despite running his own business and having no children, it took him a year to arrange a move.
"They were not forced."
Prior to the SARS-CoV-2 shots and people's slow realisation of the malice of the pharmaceutical industry, I had to watch a great many people do this with the flu shots, with them always wondering why they got the flu and got ill. I was a lone voice in maybe a million. Horrible to watch, like people marching to their own personal death camp thinking it's for 'the greater good'.
Some may get away with lesser injuries, but I find that just reinforces the risk taking behaviour. Like a speeding driver who skirts death, emboldened that they're the exception or that they're safe.
"If you want to protect your health and your fertility, you may have to make difficult choices or get creative in your workarounds."
I'd agree, but not everyone occupies the strength of the Bastille. There are definitely groups of people who could fight harder - university graduates could have mass boycotted the Universities tanking their entire grading system, for example - others I am more sympathetic to, such as parents or solo individuals in a really bad financial spot. Note the article proposes indirect methods that don't apply to typical exemptions (the 'wallet exemption' is a financial boycott).
We can do better; but there must be pragmatic advice on how.
My three brothers, their wives, and their children all got the jabs. They were broken by the psy-op. And there was definitely some "I'm better than you" thrown in. They all got the jabs very early on...long before there was a whiff of the mandates. My 18-year-old nephew went on his birthday! They were not forced.
My older brother and his wife were worried about me and my family. The other two were not speaking to me for a time.
I spent several hours with my SIL in a car last summer. Early the next morning, my older brother called to ask how I was feeling. He had covid. His wife developed symptoms a couple days later. I gave them some of my nutraceuticals and advised them on the FLCCC protocol and the McCullough protocol. They recovered without complications in about a week. I never became ill. To my knowledge, I have never been infected (but I know that I might be at some point in the future).
My 68-year-old uncle has glioblastoma.
My 71-year-old uncles has prostate cancer.
My 82-year-old aunt has rapid onset dementia.
I'm certain they all took the jabs.
It isn't fair or moral, but some of us have had to make difficult choices and sacrifices. The alternative is Russian Roulette with a syringe.
As I said above, my daughter graduated from Johns Hopkins...the portal to hell. It's now ranked 7th in the nation and 15th in the world. So what. I'm no longer impressed with these elite institutions. They are populated and run by woke syncophantic morons.
FYI, Pennsylvania allows exceptions for any reason (medical, religious, moral, etc.). The state university system is barred by law from requiring the covid jabs.
Never add or take away from the book is a wise piece of religious text , as a child in the 70s a flu vaccine left me paralyzed for days and I have never allowed another needle near me ,this was just round 1 of crazy town and the only way to fight crazy is to be crazy , violence or threats of always work for me in a given situation,now while everyone was distracted with special military operations and cost of living crisis crap , Mandatory injections have been made compulsory if the WHO declare a pandemic and not many noticed or objected , there are too many softies out there not prepared to take one for the team , look them in the eye and say in your most menacing voice, I know where you stay ,I know where your children go to school, sleep with one eye open , that is not a threat that is a prediction? .
The main purpose of exemptions is to tick a procedural box before they toss you on the dung heap with the rest of the plebs.
At least in America there is a small chance to have a religious exemption processed successfully. In Australia, with no 1st Amendment free speech right, your chances are ZERO, as per the case of the Serbian Orthodox employees vs Coopers Brewery:
@79: "The greater good of the collective was considered to outweigh the individual concerns of the applicants, whether religious in nature or otherwise."
@81: "There will be occasions where the exigencies of work collide with an employee’s personal beliefs and require difficult decisions to be made. It would be unreasonable to require workers to choose between their beliefs and their work without good reason. But in this case, there were good reasons. The policy was in line with ATAGI and government advice that vaccinations reduced transmission. It was directed at the wellbeing of all workers on site, especially those known to be immunocompromised. It served the company’s legitimate interests in maintaining continuity of operations. The policy was responsive to identified risks. It was within reasonable bounds for the company to take the cautious approach that it did to the risk of transmission, to require compliance with the policy, and to decline to grant exemptions to the applicants."
In sum: GOVERNMENT EXPERTS TOLD YOU TO OBEY. YOU REFUSED. NOW YOU ARE JOBLESS. HAHAHA. SUCK IT.
As long as clinics require you to sign an “informed consent” form to receiver the shot, every person who objects to both taking the shot (for whatever reason, or no reason) and to lying (because it is wrong to lie) is entitled to a religious exemption in the US, atheists included. This is because any “sincerely held moral belief” counts as a religious belief under law.
A problem that could occur with any of those options is the person who changed their beliefs, within any time frame. Their past WILL be used against them, eventually legally, like a reformed criminal with a “record”. Isn’t that one of the points of an all-consuming surveillance state? Get you to consent under pressure with whatever means necessary? We will see illegally collected LifeLog/Facebook, medical history data etc legally weaponized against us soon enough. Satan and his workers of iniquity are accuser’s and will force his agenda of eternal death. This is a spiritual battle-seek/accept Jesus and do not fear…
California is monstrous, and no-one understood my alarm at their forceful mandates for school children: 'but they're safe', they would parrot. In light of the harms of the SARS-CoV-2 shots, I think they now understand why such force was alarming. It grieves me greatly that it took such harms on such a scale for people to realise that.
The last point is very important - make sure your children are on the same page with you, and understand how extremely stupid, evil and dangerous the idea of vaccination is. Many parents want to shield their children from what they think will frighten them - like the knowledge that the school wants them dead, or maimed and sterilized by pushing this policy. I believe kids are resilient, smart and resourceful, and the only way to ensure this is by telling them the truth. We should not shield them from the truth, no matter how scary the current situation. They are our only hope to fix this madness in the future. Having an open dialogue inside the family is key. You cannot be there shielding them 100% of the time, so they must practice facing the evil and being not afraid, staring with the school administration.
Sasha the most difficult thing in my life was to expose the demonic, evil, wicked system that we live in to my daughter, I did this out of unconditional love. It breaks my 💔 to see & feel her pain every day. God bless you & may God protect you always. ❤🙏❤🙏❤🙏🇬🇧
Also depends on age, though, that "resiliant, smart" thing. I remember research suggesting that peer groups have larger influence in children/adolescents than parents, IIRC Steven Pinker mention that, next to genetics.
But perhaps that is even more reason to try to explain things to them in an as comprehensive way as possible, to, immunize them, as it were, to typical uninformed arguments they may encounter from peers, teachers etc.
That gets even more important as talking kids into being "trans" becomes a thing...
Kids must be prepared against emotional manipulation.
The reason peer groups typically have larger influence on children is because parents don't tell them the truth and treat them as children, while their friends treat them as equals.
"I refuse to participate in the global experimental bio weapon ☠️💉 because I refuse to be poisoned" #MyBodyMyChoice
I would have thought a simple exemption is that 'Vaccines contain poisons and I don't believe in poisoning myself as poisoning has never been good for one's health.'
That would be a scientific/medical exemption. In a functional society, simply saying 'no' to any medical procedure would be valid grounds. It would be in my book.
The problem is you're arguing with to people who are unwilling to look at medical evidence (either due to guilt, complicity or profit motive), and don't provide you any space to present any.evidence of harms.
I'd happily send them my [now outdated] 160 citation questions document (https://gitlab.com/TheUnderdog/general-research/-/blob/main/COVID-19-Shot-Questions/Revision-4-3/COVID19ShotQuestionsRevision4_3.odt); not a single question has been satisfactorily answered and all of the concerns have borne out to be true.
I have no reason to believe that medical nor religious exemptions are processed in good faith.
In my experience, it's a formality to protect them from lawsuits.
Indeed. 98.8% of exemptions in the army were denied:
https://justthenews.com/government/security/army-announces-separations-over-covid-19-vaccines-exemptions-99-disapproval
I've never liked the idea of 'exemptions' because it's essentially asking for approval from someone else in order to follow your own beliefs. In my case I didn't even file an exemption, when asked to work on a vaccine project, I flatly said 'no' because of my beliefs.
You really only need one and that's lack of informed consent for an experimental treatment which legally it was and now it's quite clear that there was a bait and switch
Lack of informed consent would be a legal objection, and you're punching way above the paygrades of the lackeys (who will be completely oblivious as to the law) who rubbestamp the approval for the *religious* exemptions.
The 'bait and switch' you refer to is product fraud, which this in my humble non-legal opinion it definitely is, given they sold it as a vaccine, but in reality it is a gene modification shot by the payload of evidence from Pfizer & Co.
A legal route would of course, necessitate litigation, which for people with not much in the way of finances or time, would not be practical. This of course presumes the local court system isn't rife with Vaccine Cultists, which in some States they're swarming with (such as California).
Trust me...at that time there were attorneys reviewing those things behind the scenes and they knew full well the injunctions would follow suit as well as the lawsuits which are just beginning now. We need PROSECUTIONS though at the local level though. Federal is out of reach now because of Biden DOJ.
Under Title 7 and RFRA, the lack of informed consent can have a spiritual context and I cited as much in my exemption request. Also, the bait and switch was ILLEGAL period. Also, legally the pfizer vaxx is considered a medical countermeasure and NOT A PHARMACEUTICAL as such it was not subject to withdrawl by the FDA but rather BARDA which is military. 21 USC 360 BBB which is what drove Judge Truncale to dismiss the Brook Jackson false claims act against Pfizer who is nothing but a contractor for the DoD in this context.
This is the legal basis for the willful misconduct case Watts vs. DoD Loyd Austin case that is currently in progress.
Trust me...at that time there were attorneys reviewing those things behind the scenes and they knew full well the injunctions would follow suit as well as the lawsuits which are just beginning now. We need PROSECUTIONS though at the local level though. Federal is out of reach now because of Biden DOJ.
Igor, the drilled-down, root of this is the very basic question of belief in either the Superiority of God....or the Superiority of man. All so-called "vaccines' are a result of man playing god, believing that God somehow messed up in the creation of the innate immune system, and that man must "fix" that with his drugs and chemicals. You either believe in Nature (which is a name for the physical expression of God here on the Earth plane)....or you believe in "science"...which has actually become a religion; scientism. That's it. That's all you need. Scriptures and references to the Catechism are secondary and can be used as examples of how organized religions command certain behaviors and call for the rejection of idol worship (of which the Cadeuceus is a symbol) but what it all comes down to is the ability to articulate this fundamental concept. This was what I explained when I was asked to clarify my religious exemption, and I was met with a thunderous silence after I finished speaking, before the challenger quietly acknowledged me, and ended the call.
- In my case, it didn't matter. I worked for the State of Massachusetts, and there were no religious exemptions allowed in any agency all across the board; this make it very clear that these people were all working in concert to get rid of everyone not in their cult, and that they didn't care who knew that they had no intention of following their own laws. I informed the director of the executive office of health and human services that they were required to provide religious accommodations, and she informed me IN WRITING that the law does not apply to them.
The corruption of this is absolutely systemic.
All I know is every time man tries to play god, something goes horribly wrong.
It certainly is; the system that is on clear display out there right now is corrupt, lawless, rotten and anti-life, and it must be completely dismantled. It is unredeemable, and those who are embedded within it must go, as they have aided and abetted its ability to keep humanity inslaved and our collective state of consciousness low.
- Scientism has as its ultimate goal human augmentation and the elimination of our connection to the Divine. If you haven't read Thomas Mayer, a contemporary of Rudolph Steiner, I highly recommend him!
The larger...and more important...question is why are colleges and universities still requiring the dangerous and useless covid jabs? Are they receiving money?
Although I understand the impulse to seek an exception, you are furthering the insanity and participating in the lie.
There are plenty of colleges and universities in the US that never required or no longer require the jabs. Choose a different school. Defer a year if you have to. Most of the so-called elite schools have been revealed as pointless indoctrination centers.
I attended a small, private college in Pennsylvania (Bucknell). When I learned they were requiring the jabs, I told them I would never send another dime. Last summer and this summer, they reached out to graduates to leave notes of encouragement to incoming students and new graduates. I told the incoming students they shouldn't attend a school that requires dangerous and unnecessary gene therapy injections they didn't need. I told the recent graduates they shouldn't have taken the shots. I'm certain my special message of encouragement will not be shared.
If we try to play by their rules, they will continue.
"Although I understand the impulse to seek an exception, you are furthering the insanity and participating in the lie."
That would be Igor's choice, and his being in Illinois, I doubt there's a non-mandate school in the region (although if anyone has any suggestions, be sure to let Igor know). In an ideal world he'd homeschool, but given both his full time job and his Substack (and I don't presume him to have a partner), I doubt he has time for it. That means he has to jump through the hoops of this crooked system.
In my case, I wasn't even offered an exemption. I just said no, then implied any attempt to force me or fire me would be an attack on my beliefs (UK has anti-discrimination laws). My manager tried a second time, said no, he threatened a write up, I said he can go ahead if he wants but I'm sticking with my beliefs. No write-up materialised.
"why are colleges and universities still requiring the dangerous and useless covid jabs? Are they receiving money?"
Yes. Not in the sense of US gov grants, but in the sense of pharmaceutical profits.
Rutgers, for example, are working on their own SARS-CoV-2 shot (to the point it resulted in Rutgers' Richard Ebright blocking me):
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/rutgers-university-exposed-self-profiteering
University of Edinburgh received funding directly from pharmaceutical companies, then stopped declaring financial sources:
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/misleading-vaccine-miscarriage-paper
Imperial College London (which is a university, don't get fooled by the name) is also working on their own mRNA shots:
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/vaccine-shill-refuses-to-disclose
So, the mandates for the universities is driven by a pharmaceutical profit motive.
Yes. I understand it's Igor's decision. This article, while inspired by his tweet, is directed at everyone. I can't tell if Igor is concerned about a mandate to attend high school or a college or university in Illinois. Illinois did not require a covid jab for the 2022-2023 school year for K-12. I can't find a final decision on the upcoming school year. The article below suggests it won't happen, but that could have changed.
https://www.mystateline.com/news/illinois-school-vaccine-mandate-unlikely-in-2023/
Many colleges and universities dropped their mandates. Some never had one.
https://nocollegemandates.com
Igor does have a partner. He's written about her before. If his son is in a science/tech/mathematics discipline, it would be very difficult to home school at the high school level but not impossible.
Yes. I'm sure schools are still taking cash from pharma companies. Are they still receiving cash from the federal government, though? That seemed to be the main driver for many schools.
I was fortunate. My children graduated from college right before the insanity started. My son's school went full covidian. My daughter attended JHU...the entrance to hell. So, I consider myself very fortunate that they weren't forced to inject. My nephew (who had Covid in September 2020) took the first two shots and had to take the booster to graduate from Boston College. I was furious, but my brother (his father) was a covidian at the time. All three of my nephews and my niece took the injections. They were not forced. Their parents thought is was the right thing to do, which really shocked me. They've all had at least three shots. One of my nephews and my niece may have had more...'cause their parents are still nuts.
I understand the difficulty, but the monster will continue as long as people fold. If you want to protect your health and your fertility, you may have to make difficult choices or get creative in your workarounds.
"Are they still receiving cash from the federal government, though?"
Good question, and if it's a public school, it will obviously be State or Federally funded.
"This article, while inspired by his tweet, is directed at everyone"
It is, as there are likely more people in Igor's position with similarity.
If I felt people had money (which, as someone who doesn't, would be hypocritical), I would advise them to "simply" move to a State or Country that still respects their medical rights and freedoms, or at least towards a less repressive school or local county with favourable attitudes.
Even presuming money, some may be tied to friends and family in the area. I watched Louis Rossmann (Right to Repair YouTuber) struggle to find a new place after New York City kept politically prosecuting him (and he was a Democrat voter!), despising the heat of Texas and the humid heat of Florida. Despite running his own business and having no children, it took him a year to arrange a move.
"They were not forced."
Prior to the SARS-CoV-2 shots and people's slow realisation of the malice of the pharmaceutical industry, I had to watch a great many people do this with the flu shots, with them always wondering why they got the flu and got ill. I was a lone voice in maybe a million. Horrible to watch, like people marching to their own personal death camp thinking it's for 'the greater good'.
Some may get away with lesser injuries, but I find that just reinforces the risk taking behaviour. Like a speeding driver who skirts death, emboldened that they're the exception or that they're safe.
"If you want to protect your health and your fertility, you may have to make difficult choices or get creative in your workarounds."
I'd agree, but not everyone occupies the strength of the Bastille. There are definitely groups of people who could fight harder - university graduates could have mass boycotted the Universities tanking their entire grading system, for example - others I am more sympathetic to, such as parents or solo individuals in a really bad financial spot. Note the article proposes indirect methods that don't apply to typical exemptions (the 'wallet exemption' is a financial boycott).
We can do better; but there must be pragmatic advice on how.
"They were not forced."
My three brothers, their wives, and their children all got the jabs. They were broken by the psy-op. And there was definitely some "I'm better than you" thrown in. They all got the jabs very early on...long before there was a whiff of the mandates. My 18-year-old nephew went on his birthday! They were not forced.
My older brother and his wife were worried about me and my family. The other two were not speaking to me for a time.
I spent several hours with my SIL in a car last summer. Early the next morning, my older brother called to ask how I was feeling. He had covid. His wife developed symptoms a couple days later. I gave them some of my nutraceuticals and advised them on the FLCCC protocol and the McCullough protocol. They recovered without complications in about a week. I never became ill. To my knowledge, I have never been infected (but I know that I might be at some point in the future).
My 68-year-old uncle has glioblastoma.
My 71-year-old uncles has prostate cancer.
My 82-year-old aunt has rapid onset dementia.
I'm certain they all took the jabs.
It isn't fair or moral, but some of us have had to make difficult choices and sacrifices. The alternative is Russian Roulette with a syringe.
As I said above, my daughter graduated from Johns Hopkins...the portal to hell. It's now ranked 7th in the nation and 15th in the world. So what. I'm no longer impressed with these elite institutions. They are populated and run by woke syncophantic morons.
If we continue to compromise, we lose.
People are dead.
People are disabled.
Babies have died in utero or shortly after birth.
We have no idea what the future holds.
There can be no compromise.
FYI, Pennsylvania allows exceptions for any reason (medical, religious, moral, etc.). The state university system is barred by law from requiring the covid jabs.
Never add or take away from the book is a wise piece of religious text , as a child in the 70s a flu vaccine left me paralyzed for days and I have never allowed another needle near me ,this was just round 1 of crazy town and the only way to fight crazy is to be crazy , violence or threats of always work for me in a given situation,now while everyone was distracted with special military operations and cost of living crisis crap , Mandatory injections have been made compulsory if the WHO declare a pandemic and not many noticed or objected , there are too many softies out there not prepared to take one for the team , look them in the eye and say in your most menacing voice, I know where you stay ,I know where your children go to school, sleep with one eye open , that is not a threat that is a prediction? .
Get ready for round 2
The main purpose of exemptions is to tick a procedural box before they toss you on the dung heap with the rest of the plebs.
At least in America there is a small chance to have a religious exemption processed successfully. In Australia, with no 1st Amendment free speech right, your chances are ZERO, as per the case of the Serbian Orthodox employees vs Coopers Brewery:
https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FWC/2022/1931.html
@79: "The greater good of the collective was considered to outweigh the individual concerns of the applicants, whether religious in nature or otherwise."
@81: "There will be occasions where the exigencies of work collide with an employee’s personal beliefs and require difficult decisions to be made. It would be unreasonable to require workers to choose between their beliefs and their work without good reason. But in this case, there were good reasons. The policy was in line with ATAGI and government advice that vaccinations reduced transmission. It was directed at the wellbeing of all workers on site, especially those known to be immunocompromised. It served the company’s legitimate interests in maintaining continuity of operations. The policy was responsive to identified risks. It was within reasonable bounds for the company to take the cautious approach that it did to the risk of transmission, to require compliance with the policy, and to decline to grant exemptions to the applicants."
In sum: GOVERNMENT EXPERTS TOLD YOU TO OBEY. YOU REFUSED. NOW YOU ARE JOBLESS. HAHAHA. SUCK IT.
As long as clinics require you to sign an “informed consent” form to receiver the shot, every person who objects to both taking the shot (for whatever reason, or no reason) and to lying (because it is wrong to lie) is entitled to a religious exemption in the US, atheists included. This is because any “sincerely held moral belief” counts as a religious belief under law.
Details and examples: https://howtosee2020.com/employees/
A problem that could occur with any of those options is the person who changed their beliefs, within any time frame. Their past WILL be used against them, eventually legally, like a reformed criminal with a “record”. Isn’t that one of the points of an all-consuming surveillance state? Get you to consent under pressure with whatever means necessary? We will see illegally collected LifeLog/Facebook, medical history data etc legally weaponized against us soon enough. Satan and his workers of iniquity are accuser’s and will force his agenda of eternal death. This is a spiritual battle-seek/accept Jesus and do not fear…
I laughed at the wallet religion exemption. Given the way public schools are at least in the US, it's probably more effective for private schools.
California is monstrous, and no-one understood my alarm at their forceful mandates for school children: 'but they're safe', they would parrot. In light of the harms of the SARS-CoV-2 shots, I think they now understand why such force was alarming. It grieves me greatly that it took such harms on such a scale for people to realise that.