Great work. I’m guessing that Part 3 is analysing how you get SCOTUS to overturn 40+ years of executive orders and laws bypassing Congress and which judges would support it. Trump got nowhere near ‘draining the swamp’ and he was especially fond of executive orders. Katherine Watt of Bailiwick News estimates that the USA stopped being a constitutional republic about the time of the end of the Civil War.
As part 2 notes, the Interstate Commerce Clause was used to overturn the Federal vaccine mandate (which is where the globalist plans derailed, you may notice). That was a concerted effort from 24 States, plus 3 additional States AGs (AGs can sue independent of the State governor).
Essentially, this rebuilds on the same premise. States have to be willing to band together again to overturn the PREP Act. It's a prelude necessary for the Florida lawsuit.
I’d like to know where that’s a law. I think most of us assume one is done upon many deaths unless illness was predetermined. I’m sure you know more about this than I do but one can always pay for one. Wether or not the coroner is paid off like most characters in this hoax is probably more the case. I’m surprised most families are mixed. All of us have had the shots, me the only one without a booster but have woken up but can’t wake any of them up.
You appear to have posted this response from another article, however I will attempt to address it in context in this article.
"I’d like to know where that’s a law"
Well, the absence of a law mandating an investigation if a 'loved one demands' is why they're not required.
It may vary by jurisdiction (not legal advice) but they're typically only required to provide autopsies for the police, and in cases of suspicious deaths. The definition of 'suspicious' is subjective, and usually implies 'when another cause has not been attributed'. So if someone dies from a blood clot, and the blood clot gets attributed as the cause... the suspicion is conveniently removed, even if we both know it is likely the shot that caused the clot.
You would either need a hypercompetent sheriff to basically demand autopsies for every death that looks vaccine related (the large numbers may overwhelm the coroner and interfere with usual police investigations), or you'd need to demonstrate evidence that the death is suspicious.
"one can always pay for one"
Yes, an independent autopsy is the way to go, but as noted, it costs money and in this era of intentional hyperinflation, people can barely afford living costs. That said, I would encourage people to pursue this if they feel they can afford it and they think the death is likely caused by the shot.
I hope a lot of vaccine injured people put together a lawsuit; the belief that you can’t sue has been a big obstacle to getting rid of these poison jabs. Mostly autopsies weren’t being performed either...I’m sure it was discouraged but why a loved one wouldn’t demand it baffles me.
Loved ones can demand, but the State nor hospital has no obligation to provide.
Of course, this presumes loved ones are aware it is vaccine derived in the first place. Typically if one member got the shot, chances are the others did as well, and therefore, are not of the inclination to question the shots.
Great work. I’m guessing that Part 3 is analysing how you get SCOTUS to overturn 40+ years of executive orders and laws bypassing Congress and which judges would support it. Trump got nowhere near ‘draining the swamp’ and he was especially fond of executive orders. Katherine Watt of Bailiwick News estimates that the USA stopped being a constitutional republic about the time of the end of the Civil War.
As part 2 notes, the Interstate Commerce Clause was used to overturn the Federal vaccine mandate (which is where the globalist plans derailed, you may notice). That was a concerted effort from 24 States, plus 3 additional States AGs (AGs can sue independent of the State governor).
Essentially, this rebuilds on the same premise. States have to be willing to band together again to overturn the PREP Act. It's a prelude necessary for the Florida lawsuit.
great points!
I’d like to know where that’s a law. I think most of us assume one is done upon many deaths unless illness was predetermined. I’m sure you know more about this than I do but one can always pay for one. Wether or not the coroner is paid off like most characters in this hoax is probably more the case. I’m surprised most families are mixed. All of us have had the shots, me the only one without a booster but have woken up but can’t wake any of them up.
You appear to have posted this response from another article, however I will attempt to address it in context in this article.
"I’d like to know where that’s a law"
Well, the absence of a law mandating an investigation if a 'loved one demands' is why they're not required.
It may vary by jurisdiction (not legal advice) but they're typically only required to provide autopsies for the police, and in cases of suspicious deaths. The definition of 'suspicious' is subjective, and usually implies 'when another cause has not been attributed'. So if someone dies from a blood clot, and the blood clot gets attributed as the cause... the suspicion is conveniently removed, even if we both know it is likely the shot that caused the clot.
You would either need a hypercompetent sheriff to basically demand autopsies for every death that looks vaccine related (the large numbers may overwhelm the coroner and interfere with usual police investigations), or you'd need to demonstrate evidence that the death is suspicious.
"one can always pay for one"
Yes, an independent autopsy is the way to go, but as noted, it costs money and in this era of intentional hyperinflation, people can barely afford living costs. That said, I would encourage people to pursue this if they feel they can afford it and they think the death is likely caused by the shot.
Thank you for explaining
I hope a lot of vaccine injured people put together a lawsuit; the belief that you can’t sue has been a big obstacle to getting rid of these poison jabs. Mostly autopsies weren’t being performed either...I’m sure it was discouraged but why a loved one wouldn’t demand it baffles me.
Loved ones can demand, but the State nor hospital has no obligation to provide.
Of course, this presumes loved ones are aware it is vaccine derived in the first place. Typically if one member got the shot, chances are the others did as well, and therefore, are not of the inclination to question the shots.
Unvaccinated won't need the autopsies.
Vaccinated won't know nor care to ask.