As you said, UD, this has been the goal all along. If a child can consent to hormones, puberty blockers, and genital mutilation then the logic follows that they can consent to buggery. This is revolting and the Internet is forever; there will be a reckoning in this life.
You can see a full size, high resolution image on the representative website. If you click either the name or the image, it will take you through to the page, where you have the option of seeing a high resolution version, or just clicking on the image to see a larger version.
I am very much a Uniparty man in that I think all parties have their pedophile elements. Especially in light of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile ring. This isn't 'fencesitter' nonsense either of 'well maybe they're both wrong', I'm very much of the 'burn it all down' variety. UK politics is similarly ridden with pedophiles.
Some are more overt. The overt ones are easier to spot. I'm more concerned by the stealthier ones who know to keep their heads low.
On the topic of Democrat nominees, did you know pro-abortion RFK Jr is in Jeffrey Epstein's blackbook? If you eyeball the blackbook (isn't the term supposed to mean 'person of which you have dirt on?') and the flight logs, you will see an awful lot of countries' leaders and politicians.
You can pretty much use it as an earmarker for how aggressive they will be against corruption. Then there's the Hunter Biden child rape scandal, the Ashley Biden diaries - also indicating child rape. The horror of the rich is a conga line.
I’m 100% with you on this and thanks again for doing the research and raising the issue. But surely this Minnesota bill is meant to remove discrimination against paedophiles, not legalise their crimes. I know it’s probably the thin end of the wedge but just want to clarify your view of its intention.
You think we should normalise what paedophiles do?
The whole point of criminalising it is so they cannot abuse children.
By reclassifying it from a crime to a "sexual orientation" you're watering down the means for convicting them for abuse. It'd be like reclassifying committing murder to a 'profession'.
The whole point is to discriminate against criminal actions. It should not be removed!
Spot on, but it could already be passed that point as these kiddy fiddling scum are now being labelled "minor attracted persons" and not paedophiles in UK and elsewhere.
Other thing important to note is 1. The sexual education classes in schools are now given to 5 years plus (not 13-15) and it is so disgusting, vile, "diverse and perverted" and explicit .. it will make you both sick and cry (even as a man), .......... 2. Kids now get support to change gender from teachers and these weird NGOs openly, WITHOUT ANY PARENTAL CONSENT and ......... 3. If a kid, 5 year olds ... that have only just learnt to wipe their rear, can identify as a girl, when they are a boy, identify as a ruddy zebra if they want, how long do you think it will before (coupled with the sex education in 1. above) these poor kids can identify as an 18 year old and want consensual sex ???....
These globalist parasitical scum are sick, evil and sadistic .. but after much research they also suffered the same fate as our poor kids will, if we do not stop them. Personally, I believe they all need ridding from society.
Words fail me; they are evil incarnate.
As you said, UD, this has been the goal all along. If a child can consent to hormones, puberty blockers, and genital mutilation then the logic follows that they can consent to buggery. This is revolting and the Internet is forever; there will be a reckoning in this life.
Time to hoist the black flag.
Photos. I use a magnifier to look at photos.
A few of the above representatives looks do not match the pronouns I use to address a male or female, could be just a glitch
I wonder Why these folks would come out of the shadows in support of this when doing so directs attention to them like the Sauron Eye.
You can see a full size, high resolution image on the representative website. If you click either the name or the image, it will take you through to the page, where you have the option of seeing a high resolution version, or just clicking on the image to see a larger version.
Thank you for the guidance. As I read the titles of the bills proposed I'm convinced some people have literally lost their minds.
LGBTQIAS2+, to my surprise I can still be surprised. Writing and sharing your work. Thank you again
Rubin Report on YouTube shorts
The Democrats are a party of pedophiles.
https://youtube.com/shorts/srUDaSqD1kY?feature=share
I am very much a Uniparty man in that I think all parties have their pedophile elements. Especially in light of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile ring. This isn't 'fencesitter' nonsense either of 'well maybe they're both wrong', I'm very much of the 'burn it all down' variety. UK politics is similarly ridden with pedophiles.
Some are more overt. The overt ones are easier to spot. I'm more concerned by the stealthier ones who know to keep their heads low.
On the topic of Democrat nominees, did you know pro-abortion RFK Jr is in Jeffrey Epstein's blackbook? If you eyeball the blackbook (isn't the term supposed to mean 'person of which you have dirt on?') and the flight logs, you will see an awful lot of countries' leaders and politicians.
You can pretty much use it as an earmarker for how aggressive they will be against corruption. Then there's the Hunter Biden child rape scandal, the Ashley Biden diaries - also indicating child rape. The horror of the rich is a conga line.
I’m 100% with you on this and thanks again for doing the research and raising the issue. But surely this Minnesota bill is meant to remove discrimination against paedophiles, not legalise their crimes. I know it’s probably the thin end of the wedge but just want to clarify your view of its intention.
"remove discrimination against paedophiles"
Sorry, what?
You think we should normalise what paedophiles do?
The whole point of criminalising it is so they cannot abuse children.
By reclassifying it from a crime to a "sexual orientation" you're watering down the means for convicting them for abuse. It'd be like reclassifying committing murder to a 'profession'.
The whole point is to discriminate against criminal actions. It should not be removed!
Spot on, but it could already be passed that point as these kiddy fiddling scum are now being labelled "minor attracted persons" and not paedophiles in UK and elsewhere.
Other thing important to note is 1. The sexual education classes in schools are now given to 5 years plus (not 13-15) and it is so disgusting, vile, "diverse and perverted" and explicit .. it will make you both sick and cry (even as a man), .......... 2. Kids now get support to change gender from teachers and these weird NGOs openly, WITHOUT ANY PARENTAL CONSENT and ......... 3. If a kid, 5 year olds ... that have only just learnt to wipe their rear, can identify as a girl, when they are a boy, identify as a ruddy zebra if they want, how long do you think it will before (coupled with the sex education in 1. above) these poor kids can identify as an 18 year old and want consensual sex ???....
These globalist parasitical scum are sick, evil and sadistic .. but after much research they also suffered the same fate as our poor kids will, if we do not stop them. Personally, I believe they all need ridding from society.