Feb 21, 2023·edited Feb 21, 2023Liked by The Underdog
An excellent piece. You raise claims similar to Ron Unz. He blames the US military solely as the bad actor but I'm glad that someone else brought up the Wuhan games. I've always felt the Chinese actions (flip flops on the virus from December to January; no lockdown until <b>after</b> the Chinese New Year) showed some intent in making sure the alpha strain spread.
My wife and I were both sick in Jan of 2020 with a respiratory illness that wiped both of us out for 2 weeks. We had all of the covid symptoms (the electric tingle rush was what convinced me) but we didnt draw the connection until later. I'm convinced this was in the wild for a while and some people saw a chance for grift and seizure of power. None of this crisis went to waste. Vaccine passports are now in the discussion. The Vaxx and masks are now a form of in-grouping and virtue signaling. Most people are idiots ir else theyd start seeing through the dialectical manipulation.
I think regardless of whether release initially was intentional or unintentional, the outcome is the same - a malicious exploitation to implement one of the most evil agendas known to mankind.
I did my absolute best wage war against their tyrannical vaccine mandate the moment I heard rumour it was in the pipeworks. I contacted so many groups, I reached out across the board, Conservatives, BLM, Islamists, Vegans, Christians, you name it, I started sowing the seeds the moment I caught wind of their scheming. I appealed to every belief and reason any person might have.
Before they knew it media were dealing with Tuskegee experiment outrage, people calling out dead baby cells in the shots, Islamists decrying it wasn't Halal, animal rights activists saying they wouldn't touch it because of the abuse of animals... I worked so hard. But we're not out of the woods yet, we need to score a decisive blow back and permanently cripple these evil tyrants because they will not just stop here.
I dont get why we need the military games to spread the virus. Wuhan has about ten million people and is a transport hub for china and the world. If it leaked by accident (Which is my take) there would be more and better opportunities then the games. Visitors getting sick in China is kind of normal due to unfamiliar bacteria, food, etc, plus bringing in people in from different parts of the world.
If Ebright is right and theres only one lab in the world outside USA and the virus appears right beside it then thats the smoking gun for me.
"I dont get why we need the military games to spread the virus"
Technically we don't, but it explains why SC2 appeared seemingly simultaneously in numerous countries without the usual delay in spread. For example, the original SARS progressed Eastwards from Asia into the Middleeast over the span of about 2 years. Somehow SC2 skipped this (most international flights will have layovers and not all are continuous).
SC2 somehow seemed to appear in nearly all western countries at rapid pace and did not spread like anyone predicted, EG at civilian airports. China did worsen the spread once it was public knowledge though - they encouraged citizens to fly out of China to other countries. It is impossible to interpret their behaviours as anything but malicious.
This is a excerpt from Dr. Ai Fens interview which was later censored in China
Dr. Ai Fen, , the Wuhan Whistle
“I will tell you the truth when I speak on my behalf. On January 21, our emergency department saw 1,523 patients, three times as often as usual, of which 655 had fever. ....... The patients kept rushing to the emergency department, and the road behind was not open, so they all piled up in the emergency department. Patients come to see a doctor for a few hours. We can’t get out work at all. There is no distinction between fever and emergency. The hall is full of patients. The infusion room in the rescue room is filled with patients. “
If the virus didnt spread in Wuhan first then why wouldn’t hospitals in other parts of the world have been over run in the same way ? It just dosnt seem probable. I have lived in China, its an 8 hour flight London to Beijing. Thats all it takes, a plane full of people and it travels the world in hours.
“China did worsen the spread once it was public knowledge though - they encouraged citizens to fly out of China to other countries.”
I dont hate China. Nearly everything I was told about China is flat out wrong. Yes the government are corrupt, rotten and selfish but there not evil at least not in the organised way the west is evil. The local government hid the disease because they’re stupid and corrupt, the national government and WHO lied about transmission - But the central government locked the entire province down, the first and largest wide scale lockdown in history - and were demonised by our screaming mainstream for being TOO repressive. They then locked down the entire nation ! What more could they do.
I still dont get the need or connection to the military games, its possible of course. But I dont see the evidence yet
"If the virus didnt spread in Wuhan first then why wouldn’t hospitals in other parts of the world have been over run in the same way ?"
Two arguments have been put forward for this, and they're not exclusive arguments.
- First -
So, the first is China staged the various scenes. For example, a lot of video footage was shown of people just lying flat on the ground - without the accompanying collapse - trying to suggest it was super deadly.
China are like the West, in that they also use propaganda. To be honest, when I first saw the incoming reports of China, I had an 'oh s**t' type moment - in that moment, it looked very much like we're were facing lockdowns, etc. Looking back, whilst it does seem like my initial fear *seemed* justified, it was clearly *wrong*, and I got played - no doubt like many.
- Second -
The second argument is one that applies to every single pandemic. So you've probably heard of the Spanish Flu (overused by the media), but what you may not have heard of is the Russian (Cold) Pandemic of the 1800s. It has much closer parallels and you'd recognise all the same hallmarks - people took Quinine to treat it, people tried to wear masks, people tried to isolate.
It was a devastating pandemic. It killed many Russians. But do you know what happened to the virus? Because the more deadly strains killed off their hosts, and were unable to spread, only the weaker strains survived. It became the common cold we all know today. The pandemic abated within about 4 years - much like the Spanish Flu. That's why we're not all dying from the Russian Pandemic or the Spanish Flu.
Now, you might be saying 'Underdog, it hadn't been four years, it hadn't even been a month'. The difference between then and now is population size. Back then, population size was in the millions, current population was in the billions (a difference of >x1000). It means the virus undergoes a much faster evolution because there are so many hosts; weaker hosts will die off sooner, taking with them the stronger strains, and stronger hosts will carry the weaker strains.
By the time the virus had exited China, there were *at least* 8 strains in circulation, and this jumped up to something like 100... within 2 months. Mainstream media didn't report on this. Did you know, there was a variant of SARS-CoV-2 that had an L-spike protein? I bet you've never heard of it and are only familiar with the S Spike Protein (S1, to be specific).
It's also why no vaccine could ever work.
This rapid mutation formed the basis of my complete and total objection to the vaccines because it was mutating too fast for any *well meaning* vaccine to keep up with, and would trigger what was known as 'Hoskins effect'. What I didn't realise at the time is the governments *weren't* well-meaning. They did not care.
The moment they said they were working on the vaccines was the moment I knew they were selfish, narrow minded scumbags. At "best" they were selling to defraud the public with snake oil. At worst they were adding additional risk and harming and killing people. Of course with these psychopaths it was the latter, because "simply" defrauding wasn't enough - they had to peddle a harmful, poisonous shot.
You know how they kept peddling the nonsense 'breakthrough' cases? That was Orwellian speak for 'our vaccines don't work because the strain they're aimed at is out of date'. Not that I believed they ever had any genuine intention of stopping the virus. I tried to warn so many people not to touch the shots... so few listened. This was before the harms were common knowledge. Bastards.
One third additional argument is that discovery of effective treatment protocols bore the blunt. I was a proactive supporter of HCQ. The evil bastards denied the public access to that - and why would they do that if there was no virus?
I can also add this. I did the calculations for the death percentages by age - it was only ever a risk for anyone over 50, and even then, it didn't hit a 5% risk until you were over 80. None of this was ever meaningfully communicated to the public. The government have killed so many.
It’s ironic that the opening of the Wuhan Military Games was the same day as Event 201, 18 October 2019. You should watch Event 201 again and decide whether they were talking about a hypothetical scenario or a certainty. In the early days, the Chinese blamed the US military and we now know the DoD was funding and participating in virus research as well as vaccine development.
Given the traces in sewage samples around the world prior to October, isn’t it more likely the virus was seeded in different places by malign intent?
It was the same with Omicron, apparently brought to Botswana by four foreigners who left the country and were never traced.
SARS2 was made for the vaccines and not vice versa.
The Event 201 and Gates talking about a corona outbreak and Shi Zhengli "warning" of a pandemic all cement in my mind there's an aspect of preplanning.
To be fair though, intent is irrelevant because in my mind they're guilty. Whether they "oops" dropped the vial or intentionally released it, their scheming was self-evident. My article intentionally gives China the benefit of the doubt in assuming an accident simply so I can demonstrate by their other actions they're blatantly guilty of malice.
Personally, I believe it was intentionally released. I don't have sufficient evidence to prove it was, just hints of circumstantial evidence pointing very strongly in that direction.
"Given the traces in sewage samples"
The Italian sewer sample I have refused to reference because they did not disclose the genetic sequence of the virus they supposedly found in the sewer samples, which makes it a sort of 'trust us bro' type exercise, and is highly suspicious. They got fragmentary matches, which if you know how PCR tests 'work' and why they're flawed... it's the same sort of problem.
The genetic sequence is important because it can be used to prove genetic timeline, as viruses mutate over time (a bit like how you can work out time of death from a decaying corpse). Their refusal to disclose raises the suspicion the genetic lineage is actually from later on, and publishing it would out the contradiction.
Inversely, if they were truthful and published that genetic lineage and it was from earlier, it would allow us to more accurately determine what the original set of virus(es) were used and where they most likely originated from.
Their avoidance is why I haven't touched that study. It's interesting, but I don't see enough evidence to trust it. I'm open to the possibility of an earlier outbreak if sufficient evidence exists.
Please help me understand how coronavirus traces could be found in March 2019 sewage sample in Spain yet the virus first escaped in fall 2019. Thank you.
I used to live in France and still follow French news closely. I recall there was much talk of sick athletes returning from Wuhan military games and the government was criticised for not implementing quarantine measures. At the time that seemed plausible to me. I guess it's possible some harmful substance was released in certain stadiums as a number of athletes certainly did go down with something. The question is, was it a virus? I now have serious doubts as I no longer believe there was any novel corona virus to start with, and have become somewhat of a virus skeptic in general. So of course I found Rappoport's explanation more plausible than yours! That said, yours was a well researched article and totally plausible if one believes in pathogenic, contagious viruses. And ttytt, I don't care what pretext is used to bring the guilty to justice, even a false one. We can deal with the virology fraud later.
I think we both agree the pharmaceutical industry is corrupt, and virus cases were definitely exaggerated via PCR tests using ridiculously high cycle thresholds (basically guaranteeing a match) and being used for diagnosis which the maker said they weren't suitable for.
That said, I was definitely infected with an illness I have not experienced prior, and treatment protocols like Quinine (which are both anti-parasitic and anti-viral) worked to abate the symptoms into non-existence, which would not work if it was mere pollution, and certainly being on the other side of the globe, it wouldn't be Chinese pollution.
Demonstrating there's a virus is crucial for several reasons:
1) It demonstrates the US and China collaborated in bioweapons research
2) It convicts Pfizer on the grounds of mutating viruses, also bioweapons research
3) It shows the spike protein in the mRNA shots is toxic, which is again necessary to show Pfizer intentionally poisoned the public and then covered it up
4) It demonstrates they are engaging in malicious genetic engineering and abuse of the human race
5) It makes sense for Pfizer to release a non-lethal virus with a lot of hype, because then they can get people to pay them billions to buy a shot they tricked people into thinking works, when deep down they know it doesn't
6) It also explains why governments blocked viable treatments like Quinine, CQ, HCQ, ivermectin, as well as the Z-Pak protocol. If it was just pollution, none of these treatments would work anyway. If it was a virus, however, it poses a threat as treatment means people won't fear the virus, meaning no-one will take the poison shots.
7) It explains the slew of gain-of-function research numerous bent scientists were paid to undertake. If what they used wasn't a virus, why spend money trying to engineer more deadly pathogens? But if there's no pathogen, then you can't convict Fauci for anything.
To me, saying they released a virus that's spreads rapidly but not does kill fits all the data I've seen. It also explains why China would spread it further in their own backyard - if it was truly fatal, that's the last thing they'd do to themselves. If it's an actual virus, it explains why they told Chinese citizens to go overseas - to increase the spread.
They exaggerated case numbers, I concur, and they definitely misattributed deaths as well. Essentially they put a magnifying glass over an ant. But I have first hand experience of seeing that proverbial ant myself.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I don't want to turn the comments section into a virus-no virus debate so I will simply say that all the good points you make are only relevant if one believes that the virus exists, which I don't. Maybe take a closer look at the very thorough work of the no virus camp, starting with Dr Mark Bailey's Farewell to Virology https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/ I was pretty much aligned with your thinking until I delved into their work. In any case, as I said, I don't care how the guilty are taken down and moreover your approach is more likely to be successful, given it is now supported by a large chunk of mainstream narrative (which is suspect in itself).
An excellent piece. You raise claims similar to Ron Unz. He blames the US military solely as the bad actor but I'm glad that someone else brought up the Wuhan games. I've always felt the Chinese actions (flip flops on the virus from December to January; no lockdown until <b>after</b> the Chinese New Year) showed some intent in making sure the alpha strain spread.
My wife and I were both sick in Jan of 2020 with a respiratory illness that wiped both of us out for 2 weeks. We had all of the covid symptoms (the electric tingle rush was what convinced me) but we didnt draw the connection until later. I'm convinced this was in the wild for a while and some people saw a chance for grift and seizure of power. None of this crisis went to waste. Vaccine passports are now in the discussion. The Vaxx and masks are now a form of in-grouping and virtue signaling. Most people are idiots ir else theyd start seeing through the dialectical manipulation.
I think regardless of whether release initially was intentional or unintentional, the outcome is the same - a malicious exploitation to implement one of the most evil agendas known to mankind.
I did my absolute best wage war against their tyrannical vaccine mandate the moment I heard rumour it was in the pipeworks. I contacted so many groups, I reached out across the board, Conservatives, BLM, Islamists, Vegans, Christians, you name it, I started sowing the seeds the moment I caught wind of their scheming. I appealed to every belief and reason any person might have.
Before they knew it media were dealing with Tuskegee experiment outrage, people calling out dead baby cells in the shots, Islamists decrying it wasn't Halal, animal rights activists saying they wouldn't touch it because of the abuse of animals... I worked so hard. But we're not out of the woods yet, we need to score a decisive blow back and permanently cripple these evil tyrants because they will not just stop here.
Thanks for writing this, it interesting info !
I dont get why we need the military games to spread the virus. Wuhan has about ten million people and is a transport hub for china and the world. If it leaked by accident (Which is my take) there would be more and better opportunities then the games. Visitors getting sick in China is kind of normal due to unfamiliar bacteria, food, etc, plus bringing in people in from different parts of the world.
If Ebright is right and theres only one lab in the world outside USA and the virus appears right beside it then thats the smoking gun for me.
"I dont get why we need the military games to spread the virus"
Technically we don't, but it explains why SC2 appeared seemingly simultaneously in numerous countries without the usual delay in spread. For example, the original SARS progressed Eastwards from Asia into the Middleeast over the span of about 2 years. Somehow SC2 skipped this (most international flights will have layovers and not all are continuous).
SC2 somehow seemed to appear in nearly all western countries at rapid pace and did not spread like anyone predicted, EG at civilian airports. China did worsen the spread once it was public knowledge though - they encouraged citizens to fly out of China to other countries. It is impossible to interpret their behaviours as anything but malicious.
Hi Mr Underdog - hope your well :-)
This is a excerpt from Dr. Ai Fens interview which was later censored in China
Dr. Ai Fen, , the Wuhan Whistle
“I will tell you the truth when I speak on my behalf. On January 21, our emergency department saw 1,523 patients, three times as often as usual, of which 655 had fever. ....... The patients kept rushing to the emergency department, and the road behind was not open, so they all piled up in the emergency department. Patients come to see a doctor for a few hours. We can’t get out work at all. There is no distinction between fever and emergency. The hall is full of patients. The infusion room in the rescue room is filled with patients. “
If the virus didnt spread in Wuhan first then why wouldn’t hospitals in other parts of the world have been over run in the same way ? It just dosnt seem probable. I have lived in China, its an 8 hour flight London to Beijing. Thats all it takes, a plane full of people and it travels the world in hours.
“China did worsen the spread once it was public knowledge though - they encouraged citizens to fly out of China to other countries.”
I dont hate China. Nearly everything I was told about China is flat out wrong. Yes the government are corrupt, rotten and selfish but there not evil at least not in the organised way the west is evil. The local government hid the disease because they’re stupid and corrupt, the national government and WHO lied about transmission - But the central government locked the entire province down, the first and largest wide scale lockdown in history - and were demonised by our screaming mainstream for being TOO repressive. They then locked down the entire nation ! What more could they do.
I still dont get the need or connection to the military games, its possible of course. But I dont see the evidence yet
Hey Kevin.
"If the virus didnt spread in Wuhan first then why wouldn’t hospitals in other parts of the world have been over run in the same way ?"
Two arguments have been put forward for this, and they're not exclusive arguments.
- First -
So, the first is China staged the various scenes. For example, a lot of video footage was shown of people just lying flat on the ground - without the accompanying collapse - trying to suggest it was super deadly.
China are like the West, in that they also use propaganda. To be honest, when I first saw the incoming reports of China, I had an 'oh s**t' type moment - in that moment, it looked very much like we're were facing lockdowns, etc. Looking back, whilst it does seem like my initial fear *seemed* justified, it was clearly *wrong*, and I got played - no doubt like many.
- Second -
The second argument is one that applies to every single pandemic. So you've probably heard of the Spanish Flu (overused by the media), but what you may not have heard of is the Russian (Cold) Pandemic of the 1800s. It has much closer parallels and you'd recognise all the same hallmarks - people took Quinine to treat it, people tried to wear masks, people tried to isolate.
It was a devastating pandemic. It killed many Russians. But do you know what happened to the virus? Because the more deadly strains killed off their hosts, and were unable to spread, only the weaker strains survived. It became the common cold we all know today. The pandemic abated within about 4 years - much like the Spanish Flu. That's why we're not all dying from the Russian Pandemic or the Spanish Flu.
Now, you might be saying 'Underdog, it hadn't been four years, it hadn't even been a month'. The difference between then and now is population size. Back then, population size was in the millions, current population was in the billions (a difference of >x1000). It means the virus undergoes a much faster evolution because there are so many hosts; weaker hosts will die off sooner, taking with them the stronger strains, and stronger hosts will carry the weaker strains.
By the time the virus had exited China, there were *at least* 8 strains in circulation, and this jumped up to something like 100... within 2 months. Mainstream media didn't report on this. Did you know, there was a variant of SARS-CoV-2 that had an L-spike protein? I bet you've never heard of it and are only familiar with the S Spike Protein (S1, to be specific).
It's also why no vaccine could ever work.
This rapid mutation formed the basis of my complete and total objection to the vaccines because it was mutating too fast for any *well meaning* vaccine to keep up with, and would trigger what was known as 'Hoskins effect'. What I didn't realise at the time is the governments *weren't* well-meaning. They did not care.
The moment they said they were working on the vaccines was the moment I knew they were selfish, narrow minded scumbags. At "best" they were selling to defraud the public with snake oil. At worst they were adding additional risk and harming and killing people. Of course with these psychopaths it was the latter, because "simply" defrauding wasn't enough - they had to peddle a harmful, poisonous shot.
You know how they kept peddling the nonsense 'breakthrough' cases? That was Orwellian speak for 'our vaccines don't work because the strain they're aimed at is out of date'. Not that I believed they ever had any genuine intention of stopping the virus. I tried to warn so many people not to touch the shots... so few listened. This was before the harms were common knowledge. Bastards.
One third additional argument is that discovery of effective treatment protocols bore the blunt. I was a proactive supporter of HCQ. The evil bastards denied the public access to that - and why would they do that if there was no virus?
I can also add this. I did the calculations for the death percentages by age - it was only ever a risk for anyone over 50, and even then, it didn't hit a 5% risk until you were over 80. None of this was ever meaningfully communicated to the public. The government have killed so many.
I don't blame you for not trusting them.
It’s ironic that the opening of the Wuhan Military Games was the same day as Event 201, 18 October 2019. You should watch Event 201 again and decide whether they were talking about a hypothetical scenario or a certainty. In the early days, the Chinese blamed the US military and we now know the DoD was funding and participating in virus research as well as vaccine development.
Given the traces in sewage samples around the world prior to October, isn’t it more likely the virus was seeded in different places by malign intent?
It was the same with Omicron, apparently brought to Botswana by four foreigners who left the country and were never traced.
SARS2 was made for the vaccines and not vice versa.
The Event 201 and Gates talking about a corona outbreak and Shi Zhengli "warning" of a pandemic all cement in my mind there's an aspect of preplanning.
To be fair though, intent is irrelevant because in my mind they're guilty. Whether they "oops" dropped the vial or intentionally released it, their scheming was self-evident. My article intentionally gives China the benefit of the doubt in assuming an accident simply so I can demonstrate by their other actions they're blatantly guilty of malice.
Personally, I believe it was intentionally released. I don't have sufficient evidence to prove it was, just hints of circumstantial evidence pointing very strongly in that direction.
"Given the traces in sewage samples"
The Italian sewer sample I have refused to reference because they did not disclose the genetic sequence of the virus they supposedly found in the sewer samples, which makes it a sort of 'trust us bro' type exercise, and is highly suspicious. They got fragmentary matches, which if you know how PCR tests 'work' and why they're flawed... it's the same sort of problem.
The genetic sequence is important because it can be used to prove genetic timeline, as viruses mutate over time (a bit like how you can work out time of death from a decaying corpse). Their refusal to disclose raises the suspicion the genetic lineage is actually from later on, and publishing it would out the contradiction.
Inversely, if they were truthful and published that genetic lineage and it was from earlier, it would allow us to more accurately determine what the original set of virus(es) were used and where they most likely originated from.
Their avoidance is why I haven't touched that study. It's interesting, but I don't see enough evidence to trust it. I'm open to the possibility of an earlier outbreak if sufficient evidence exists.
This is your best work yet in my opinion, I haven't heard of this yet until now. I learned a lot from you thank you..
Please help me understand how coronavirus traces could be found in March 2019 sewage sample in Spain yet the virus first escaped in fall 2019. Thank you.
Jon Rappoport's brilliant take on the origin of the Covid fraud.
Wuhan: back to the beginning, where the whole fraud started; buried revelations
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/21/wuhan-back-to-the-beginning-where-the-whole-fraud-started-buried-revelations/
I don't find Jon's position to be particularly convincing.
He blames "pollution" - as if that could spread worldwide, and seems more like a front for the climate change scam.
He doesn't offer any real research or references for his work. Seems more like FUD and does not strike me as being particularly brilliant.
I used to live in France and still follow French news closely. I recall there was much talk of sick athletes returning from Wuhan military games and the government was criticised for not implementing quarantine measures. At the time that seemed plausible to me. I guess it's possible some harmful substance was released in certain stadiums as a number of athletes certainly did go down with something. The question is, was it a virus? I now have serious doubts as I no longer believe there was any novel corona virus to start with, and have become somewhat of a virus skeptic in general. So of course I found Rappoport's explanation more plausible than yours! That said, yours was a well researched article and totally plausible if one believes in pathogenic, contagious viruses. And ttytt, I don't care what pretext is used to bring the guilty to justice, even a false one. We can deal with the virology fraud later.
I think we both agree the pharmaceutical industry is corrupt, and virus cases were definitely exaggerated via PCR tests using ridiculously high cycle thresholds (basically guaranteeing a match) and being used for diagnosis which the maker said they weren't suitable for.
That said, I was definitely infected with an illness I have not experienced prior, and treatment protocols like Quinine (which are both anti-parasitic and anti-viral) worked to abate the symptoms into non-existence, which would not work if it was mere pollution, and certainly being on the other side of the globe, it wouldn't be Chinese pollution.
Demonstrating there's a virus is crucial for several reasons:
1) It demonstrates the US and China collaborated in bioweapons research
2) It convicts Pfizer on the grounds of mutating viruses, also bioweapons research
3) It shows the spike protein in the mRNA shots is toxic, which is again necessary to show Pfizer intentionally poisoned the public and then covered it up
4) It demonstrates they are engaging in malicious genetic engineering and abuse of the human race
5) It makes sense for Pfizer to release a non-lethal virus with a lot of hype, because then they can get people to pay them billions to buy a shot they tricked people into thinking works, when deep down they know it doesn't
6) It also explains why governments blocked viable treatments like Quinine, CQ, HCQ, ivermectin, as well as the Z-Pak protocol. If it was just pollution, none of these treatments would work anyway. If it was a virus, however, it poses a threat as treatment means people won't fear the virus, meaning no-one will take the poison shots.
7) It explains the slew of gain-of-function research numerous bent scientists were paid to undertake. If what they used wasn't a virus, why spend money trying to engineer more deadly pathogens? But if there's no pathogen, then you can't convict Fauci for anything.
To me, saying they released a virus that's spreads rapidly but not does kill fits all the data I've seen. It also explains why China would spread it further in their own backyard - if it was truly fatal, that's the last thing they'd do to themselves. If it's an actual virus, it explains why they told Chinese citizens to go overseas - to increase the spread.
They exaggerated case numbers, I concur, and they definitely misattributed deaths as well. Essentially they put a magnifying glass over an ant. But I have first hand experience of seeing that proverbial ant myself.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I don't want to turn the comments section into a virus-no virus debate so I will simply say that all the good points you make are only relevant if one believes that the virus exists, which I don't. Maybe take a closer look at the very thorough work of the no virus camp, starting with Dr Mark Bailey's Farewell to Virology https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/ I was pretty much aligned with your thinking until I delved into their work. In any case, as I said, I don't care how the guilty are taken down and moreover your approach is more likely to be successful, given it is now supported by a large chunk of mainstream narrative (which is suspect in itself).
A song about the fraud of Virology. Listen to THE DISH. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish
Then try this one.
Exposé: The Chinese 'lab theory,' 'gain of function', bioweapons MYTH - how your mind and heart are being played
Rabbi Smith
https://rabbismith.substack.com/p/expose-the-chinese-lab-theory-gain
Yes, far more plausible