The Murder Cycle: Deny Treatment, Cause Disease, Sell Product
Anti-malarials blocked as mozzies released and mRNA gene shot prepared
Remember when the governments banned the use of the following anti-malarial drugs?
Chloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine
Ivermectin
The FDA single-handedly chilled the prescribing of anti-malarial drugs (ivermectin; hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine) with arguably the most scientifically illiterate Tweet imaginable:
Such was the chilling effect of the FDA’s “advisory” where the FDA revoked permission to treat, is that hospitals refused the use of ivermectin, forcing doctors to sue, and those were the ones willing to go that length in order to prescribe. The FDA also advised doctors to stop using other anti-malarials hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine.
The anti-malarial drugs have a proven track record of being safe, to the point Kenya and Ghana approved it for use for COVID-19. They were even available over-the-counter, until Kenyans started stockpiling the drug, forcing Kenya to adopt a prescription system to avoid running out; there were no mass deaths of Kenyans overdosing on Chloroquine there.
Other regions, like Europe, advised against the use of ivermectin, which is less of an advisory, and more of a death sentence for the prescribing of it as doctors fear running afoul of the State that gave them their licence. France outright banned anti-malarial hydoxychloroquine, lest there was any doubt.
Or places like Australia, explicitly banned ivermectin, fining people thousands of Australian dollars for importing the drug, and fining people for advertising the drug.
Queensland, Australia, explicitly banned doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine, as Queensland politician, Malcolm Roberts, questioned why ivermectin was banned (emphasis added):
I have prescriptions for ivermectin from two doctors. Why can’t all Australians have that freedom to choose? Why isn’t Australia’s government adopting ivermectin? Why did the TGA threaten and try to silence me with a letter when I discussed ivermectin with constituents as their representative in parliament? I mentioned ivermectin in a YouTube video and was banned for a week. Member of parliament Craig Kelly made statements based on solid data. After speaking about ivermectin, Facebook banned him forever. Why are doctors scared of being struck off the doctors’ registry if they prescribe ivermectin to cure their patients?
And this fear, this chilling effect, of being struck has no doubt led to the intended consequence of heavily discouraging doctors from prescribing hydoxychloroquine, chloroquine and ivermectin, for any purpose, for fear it gets mistaken as stealthy prescribing for COVID-19.
And the consequences for such totalitarianism is the emergence of a complete unheard of condition in Western nations; malaria. Texas has already gotten their first case. Texas claim it is “locally acquired”.
As it so happens, Pfizer are planning to profiteer from their total control of the so-called “regulators” who rubberstamp anything and everything the pharmaceutical companies demand… by releasing, you guessed it, yet another gene modifying mRNA shot, supposedly for malaria. They’ve been working on the trials since December 2022:
Testing, as per usual, on the poor ol’ Africans, because now Westerners know better than to take Pfizer’s poison, so better to hock it on an underdeveloped country with no access to self-education resources to warn themselves of the dangers.
Then there’s that awkward bother of the vaccine manufacturers planning to release diseases via mosquitoes. And guess who are involved? Surprise…
The Texas Medical Branch, in Galveston, Texas, where the ‘local’ case occurred! Wow, such a coincidence.
Nobody mention the fact Bill Gates is releasing genetically modified mosquitoes in 11 countries:
And yes, these ones are designed to help “fight” (read: spread) malaria:
Then there’s usual culprits Imperial College London behind it as well:
Nobody has independently verified their dubious claims, and given their history of lying, it must not be taken at face value. The gene modifying mRNA shots were supposed to “reduce” COVID-19, but caused the opposite; we ought to assume the same here.
After all, why would they announce their evil plans as ‘hahaha we plan to spread malaria to sell the gene modifying mRNA shots we have a financial conflict of interest in’, when they can, and do, lie?
No wonder the media is rife with screeching about mosquito borne diseases…
…despite the fact those diseases don’t naturally spread in such countries…
…and don’t have any symptoms.
A Bastiat Crime, forming a murder cycle: deny people treatment for illnesses, spread the disease, sell them a product that doesn’t work, on an infinitely reoccurring annual timescale.
Dare to do different. Subscribe.
Expose the fraud?
And post a comment (or file an F45 complaint form below):
That'll be a Public Execution - but fun to watch!
Mick from Hooe, UK (Unjabbed)
Thanks Underdog!
My facetious mind took over my logic and 10 steps of how Big Pharma's criminality simply flowed onto my ranting!
SIDS another 'LOB' is just another example of how profit comes before ethics! (LOB = maybe just British = 'a load of bollox'.)
Cheers! Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed because I joined the dots early on!