A long and interesting ON Point article that could have been summed up in a short sentence:
Judge a man by his actions, not his words.
Trump was not shy to talk a lot of talk, but coming short when he had to back those words with actions. Any individual with a bit of common sense would have come to the conclusion that something IS NOT RIGHT ABOUT TRUMP just by comparing his list of talking points with his list of deeds.
The best point made IS THAT NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU, ONLY YOU CAN DO IT. Stop expecting Messiah and get down to hard work.
You had some really good points. I thought that was an interesting writeup. In my opinion, I think it would be much better to start with the "Wrestling Analogy" section and then end at the section "Well, What If Trump Is Just…"
I appreciate the feedback. The admittedly lengthy opener is intended to bridge and reach out to voters who feel this might be yet 'just another' attack on Trump by some overly opinionated mainstream media pundit and kneejerk toss the baby with the bathwater, when in reality it's from one member of the public to another airing their concerns of a flawed political system.
One of the first accusations I got when I first posted the link was the accusation I had 'TDS', which I knew meant they hadn't read the article as it's the very first possible accusations I addressed.
It's difficult to convey a subject people can be sensitive on without alienating the audience. For those less concerned, I imagine it appeared as overly sensitive fluff. Can't please everybody. : )
Thank you for this blog. At one point Trump looked like he had the Dems beaten in 2020 but he was outplayed by the medical cartel and allowed Pfauci to become president. Medical tyranny is the number one issue since the lockdowns in 2020. Please listen and share Turfseer's music videos.
THE VIRUS IS MY GOD
The “virus” is claimed to have invaded a town in the old west and soon worshipped as a new idol among the populace
Can you just confirm for me you're not an automated bot?
I find the third person remark of "Please listen and share Turfseer's music videos." and not 'Please listen and share my music videos' to be very strange, also kinda looks like an advertising plug to me thinly veiled as a comment.
I am not an automated bot. I am a songwriter who writes songs and creates music videos exposing medical tyranny. Please feel free to share them if you like.
I count the newly aggressive Supreme Court not as something WE did, but an after-effect of Trump's Supreme Court picks. Apparently he did not get the memo that the Bushes got, to not appoint anti-Roe judges (recall that Bush I appointed Souter, and Bush II appointed Roberts and tried to appoint Harriet Miers.) So he gets credit for those. He also gets credit for appointing Betsy DeVos, who shoved PC down the throat of the President of Princeton, Eisgruber, and threatened to withhold $21mln or so because Eisgruber, in saying that Princeton was racist, was counteracting the sworn statement that they WEREN'T racist to be approved for Federal Education dollars.
That was superb, the best giving it back to the PC I've ever seen. But I cannot count too many other actions.
It lets you know how rotten the elites are to working class whites that all Trump had to do was not dump on them and rile their enemies and they loved him. Imagine someone who actually DID something for them.
"Imagine someone who actually DID something for them."
We already have an insight into that. There's two ways it can go. It can be "ignored" (like how none of the "free speech" proponents talk about using Gab), or it can be jailed/exiled/killed off (Seth Rich, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, insert your own).
There are many people who do things for the public. Many whistleblowers (consider the reporting on the EMA leak). The ones mentioned above are just the popular, known ones. There are thousands of whistleblowers out there, ones you likely haven't heard of. Do you know the name of the woman who blew the whistle on the Pfizer trial data fraud?
The point of this article is they don't get fancy airtime, they don't get talked about, they get buried.
"I count the newly aggressive Supreme Court not as something WE did, but an after-effect of Trump's Supreme Court picks"
Court cases are a three-way relationship. You have the plaintiff/litigator, the defendant, and the judge. So when I say, you, the public did that - you did. In this case, it was in the role of defendant.
Dobbs, the pro-child murder advocate, brought the case against Missouri, who had recently enacted laws against their child murdering operation ("abortion"). These laws in Missouri were driven by the public, who ensured the Missouri government not only enacted them, but upheld them.
Missouri "could" have folded, but they didn't. With support from the public and eyes watching, they fought all the way to the Supreme Court. SCOTUS didn't technically "end" child murder, they Overturned Roe v Wade; child murder is still horribly 'legal' in many States; all the overturn did was return control back to the States. Localism. Control back to the public. The public are why it is succeeding. It's a multi-part story. A lot of work went into this.
In terms of SCOTUS appointment itself, I'm of the view it is stretching it, because to be able to appoint, justices must either step down, retire or die - in-theory a situation beyond Trump's control.
Now, you could insinuate Trump bumped off Ruth Bader Ginsberg (the main advocate for Roe v Wade), but her cancer was historical, known before his time. So I guess you'd have to credit the cancer for the sense of timing? #TeamCancer
All appointment selections require sponsorship of the Senate. The same Senate that, if you recall, voted against the Election Recount. As said, a President does not hold much power in the US, especially on selections and Congress - it was designed that way intentionally.
It'd also do a disservice to the justice themselves, as if the decades they had spent working in their career was a single point of accreditation. This is the same SCOTUS, however, that refused to hear the Election Fraud case. So, if you credit the Roe v Wade overturn to Trump, you'd have to credit the failure to prosecute Election Fraud to Trump as well.
If you want to hear my craziest opinionated theory - it's that the mRNA shots were too successful in harming and maiming people, so naturally population numbers are about to crash. No need for population control measures like murdering children under abortion if an injectable can achieve the same goal:
Also, Trump did support pro-abortion Dr Oz for endorsement. That rubs me up the wrong way, as do the other critiques. In my view, I'm sticking with backing the public, I know their reactions are genuine, and hopefully as they get involved more - like at School Boards and similarly - they can turn the tide of the war.
I have your trust of the public, too. One thing they keep talking about is support for "democracy," but they don't really mean that. If they did, then there'd be a lot more plebiscites, referenda, and initiatives, in which the people get to vote, as they did in Brexit. Recall that liberal California voted down gay marriage, subsequently overturned by the courts and not defended by the state government. The election of 2021 saw a number of potentially catastrophic ballot issues in NY State but the people of the state rejected them.
It's much easier to buy 435 Representatives (compare voters per Rep in the USA and, say, Britain) and 100 Senators than 200+ million adult voters.
I'm not a Trump fan and do not want to see his return. Stirring up the Left and losing control of the Congress he was handed (he also led to the defeat of several moderate Republicans in the Northeast, emboldening a radically progressive Democratic Party) would give ample reason why the Republican establishment doesn't want him back. It might also explain the refusal to support him in 2020 by the Supreme Court.
All great points, and you've highlighted some of the key reasons I support Constitutional Direct Democracy. The cost of 'buying out' a politician must become so high as to be unaffordable - and what better than to make millions their own voting politicians?
I agree with you no sensible public will vote on a suicidal ballot. Right now, the issue is the threshold. It costs a lot of time and money just to get a ballot before the people. The other issue is knowledge - or lack of it - but education can be improved over time.
What's interesting to note about the American Revolution is the British colonies existed for 200 years before the revolt even began - well over 3 generations - what triggered it was the final realisation that the "representatives" did not represent them. People need to realise this more strongly than anything. Once you realise a system isn't fair and doesn't play by the rules, you stop participating and start taking new forms of action.
I need to write on the subject at some point soon. As for who you voted for, I don't judge a man by that. Petty, shallow politics aims at groups and names. Real politics tackles ideas, solutions, identifying problems and fixing them. Group politics is dead, we're in the era of ideas.
A long and interesting ON Point article that could have been summed up in a short sentence:
Judge a man by his actions, not his words.
Trump was not shy to talk a lot of talk, but coming short when he had to back those words with actions. Any individual with a bit of common sense would have come to the conclusion that something IS NOT RIGHT ABOUT TRUMP just by comparing his list of talking points with his list of deeds.
The best point made IS THAT NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU, ONLY YOU CAN DO IT. Stop expecting Messiah and get down to hard work.
Thanks, glad you liked it.
You had some really good points. I thought that was an interesting writeup. In my opinion, I think it would be much better to start with the "Wrestling Analogy" section and then end at the section "Well, What If Trump Is Just…"
Otherwise: good work.
:)
I appreciate the feedback. The admittedly lengthy opener is intended to bridge and reach out to voters who feel this might be yet 'just another' attack on Trump by some overly opinionated mainstream media pundit and kneejerk toss the baby with the bathwater, when in reality it's from one member of the public to another airing their concerns of a flawed political system.
One of the first accusations I got when I first posted the link was the accusation I had 'TDS', which I knew meant they hadn't read the article as it's the very first possible accusations I addressed.
It's difficult to convey a subject people can be sensitive on without alienating the audience. For those less concerned, I imagine it appeared as overly sensitive fluff. Can't please everybody. : )
Thank you for this blog. At one point Trump looked like he had the Dems beaten in 2020 but he was outplayed by the medical cartel and allowed Pfauci to become president. Medical tyranny is the number one issue since the lockdowns in 2020. Please listen and share Turfseer's music videos.
THE VIRUS IS MY GOD
The “virus” is claimed to have invaded a town in the old west and soon worshipped as a new idol among the populace
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Viy5g4Sms88
CHURCH OF THE PANDEMIC MIND
There’s a new church in town where fear of demons turn neighbor against neighbor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVFjzM5nSro
1692 WAS A VERY GOOD YEAR
The mainstream Covid narrative is compared to the Salem Witchcraft trials
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx8keLopGIM
TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG
“Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton join forces to remind us “Trust the Science”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szPvXq8UXGU
POD PEOPLE BARBECUE
Aliens take over peoples’ bodies and turn them into mask-wearing zombies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr5y3gndykM
SHEEPLE UNIVERSITY
The people graduate “with honors” at mass conformity Sheeple University
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPt5jtIMqnQ&t=3s
THE COMMANDANT
Welcome to internment camps for the unvaccinated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SR9L-TRmfs
FOREVER FREEDOM BRIGADE
The anthem of the anti-lockdown movement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euL2M7y9uFE
1984 IS HERE
The famous novel becomes a metaphor for the current dilemma we find ourselves in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRivqggeAbI
VACCINE, MY LOVE!
A satire on virus mania
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDN0TBL383s
O HOLY ROMAN
A child asserts his independence from other children who wear the mask
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV25IBWFwJw
YOU DIDN’T RECOGNIZE ME
A familiar figure pulls the strings behind the plandemic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAg9ECs6d9g
THE BALLAD OF TYPHOID MARY
The story of Mary Mallon, one of the first victims of medical tyranny
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJmr7o8K9mU
Free song and music video downloads from Turfseer's Forever Freedom song collection at www.turfseermusic.com
Can you just confirm for me you're not an automated bot?
I find the third person remark of "Please listen and share Turfseer's music videos." and not 'Please listen and share my music videos' to be very strange, also kinda looks like an advertising plug to me thinly veiled as a comment.
I am not an automated bot. I am a songwriter who writes songs and creates music videos exposing medical tyranny. Please feel free to share them if you like.
I count the newly aggressive Supreme Court not as something WE did, but an after-effect of Trump's Supreme Court picks. Apparently he did not get the memo that the Bushes got, to not appoint anti-Roe judges (recall that Bush I appointed Souter, and Bush II appointed Roberts and tried to appoint Harriet Miers.) So he gets credit for those. He also gets credit for appointing Betsy DeVos, who shoved PC down the throat of the President of Princeton, Eisgruber, and threatened to withhold $21mln or so because Eisgruber, in saying that Princeton was racist, was counteracting the sworn statement that they WEREN'T racist to be approved for Federal Education dollars.
That was superb, the best giving it back to the PC I've ever seen. But I cannot count too many other actions.
It lets you know how rotten the elites are to working class whites that all Trump had to do was not dump on them and rile their enemies and they loved him. Imagine someone who actually DID something for them.
"Imagine someone who actually DID something for them."
We already have an insight into that. There's two ways it can go. It can be "ignored" (like how none of the "free speech" proponents talk about using Gab), or it can be jailed/exiled/killed off (Seth Rich, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, insert your own).
There are many people who do things for the public. Many whistleblowers (consider the reporting on the EMA leak). The ones mentioned above are just the popular, known ones. There are thousands of whistleblowers out there, ones you likely haven't heard of. Do you know the name of the woman who blew the whistle on the Pfizer trial data fraud?
The point of this article is they don't get fancy airtime, they don't get talked about, they get buried.
"I count the newly aggressive Supreme Court not as something WE did, but an after-effect of Trump's Supreme Court picks"
Court cases are a three-way relationship. You have the plaintiff/litigator, the defendant, and the judge. So when I say, you, the public did that - you did. In this case, it was in the role of defendant.
Dobbs, the pro-child murder advocate, brought the case against Missouri, who had recently enacted laws against their child murdering operation ("abortion"). These laws in Missouri were driven by the public, who ensured the Missouri government not only enacted them, but upheld them.
Missouri "could" have folded, but they didn't. With support from the public and eyes watching, they fought all the way to the Supreme Court. SCOTUS didn't technically "end" child murder, they Overturned Roe v Wade; child murder is still horribly 'legal' in many States; all the overturn did was return control back to the States. Localism. Control back to the public. The public are why it is succeeding. It's a multi-part story. A lot of work went into this.
In terms of SCOTUS appointment itself, I'm of the view it is stretching it, because to be able to appoint, justices must either step down, retire or die - in-theory a situation beyond Trump's control.
Now, you could insinuate Trump bumped off Ruth Bader Ginsberg (the main advocate for Roe v Wade), but her cancer was historical, known before his time. So I guess you'd have to credit the cancer for the sense of timing? #TeamCancer
All appointment selections require sponsorship of the Senate. The same Senate that, if you recall, voted against the Election Recount. As said, a President does not hold much power in the US, especially on selections and Congress - it was designed that way intentionally.
It'd also do a disservice to the justice themselves, as if the decades they had spent working in their career was a single point of accreditation. This is the same SCOTUS, however, that refused to hear the Election Fraud case. So, if you credit the Roe v Wade overturn to Trump, you'd have to credit the failure to prosecute Election Fraud to Trump as well.
If you want to hear my craziest opinionated theory - it's that the mRNA shots were too successful in harming and maiming people, so naturally population numbers are about to crash. No need for population control measures like murdering children under abortion if an injectable can achieve the same goal:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
Also, Trump did support pro-abortion Dr Oz for endorsement. That rubs me up the wrong way, as do the other critiques. In my view, I'm sticking with backing the public, I know their reactions are genuine, and hopefully as they get involved more - like at School Boards and similarly - they can turn the tide of the war.
I have your trust of the public, too. One thing they keep talking about is support for "democracy," but they don't really mean that. If they did, then there'd be a lot more plebiscites, referenda, and initiatives, in which the people get to vote, as they did in Brexit. Recall that liberal California voted down gay marriage, subsequently overturned by the courts and not defended by the state government. The election of 2021 saw a number of potentially catastrophic ballot issues in NY State but the people of the state rejected them.
It's much easier to buy 435 Representatives (compare voters per Rep in the USA and, say, Britain) and 100 Senators than 200+ million adult voters.
I'm not a Trump fan and do not want to see his return. Stirring up the Left and losing control of the Congress he was handed (he also led to the defeat of several moderate Republicans in the Northeast, emboldening a radically progressive Democratic Party) would give ample reason why the Republican establishment doesn't want him back. It might also explain the refusal to support him in 2020 by the Supreme Court.
All great points, and you've highlighted some of the key reasons I support Constitutional Direct Democracy. The cost of 'buying out' a politician must become so high as to be unaffordable - and what better than to make millions their own voting politicians?
I agree with you no sensible public will vote on a suicidal ballot. Right now, the issue is the threshold. It costs a lot of time and money just to get a ballot before the people. The other issue is knowledge - or lack of it - but education can be improved over time.
What's interesting to note about the American Revolution is the British colonies existed for 200 years before the revolt even began - well over 3 generations - what triggered it was the final realisation that the "representatives" did not represent them. People need to realise this more strongly than anything. Once you realise a system isn't fair and doesn't play by the rules, you stop participating and start taking new forms of action.
I need to write on the subject at some point soon. As for who you voted for, I don't judge a man by that. Petty, shallow politics aims at groups and names. Real politics tackles ideas, solutions, identifying problems and fixing them. Group politics is dead, we're in the era of ideas.