Us proud Conspiracy Theorists realised the stats about Fauci's modified Covid were exaggerated beyond reality. The establishment used every evil method imaginable to exaggerate Covid impact.
When I hear Covid Death stats emanating from the 'Experts' enjoying financial benefits from the deadly injections called vaccines. I prefer to start with a mortality rate of ZERO until an old person is killed by remdesivir or intubation. I was all to justify profits from poorly planned injections (Vax?)
I stopped wearing a mask in mid 2020, when it suddenly dawned upon me that I was promoting a farce which would continue until people began telling others of their suspicions and beliefs. This was after realising that 'natural immunity' should protect the vast majority of us all. I'm 79 and in good health.
I then went on to defy all the unreasonable draconian 'Rules' that were imprisoning and silencing those of us prepared to disobey the 'Experts'. 'Early Covid science' seemed to be constantly modified to suit the 'Lock-Down' and 'distancing' rules. It seemed to me that I/we were being oppressed. I'd had enough! I realised that being a Conspiracy Theorist was, in reality, a badge of honour for those telling the truth.
After a few short months, the EXPERIMENTAL INJECTIONS they pretended were 'VACCINES' appeared.
'NO LIABILITY' for human DEATH by injection must mean the continuance of DEADLY mRNA injections ('vaccines') must cease immediately. They do NOTHING except reduce life expectancy and cause infertility! Perhaps that was the designated purpose of such useless 'medicines'?
The FDA, CDC, Big Pharma, all colluded to hide proven medicines like IVERMECTIN, etc, and hid such information in order to justify the lucrative spoils that were liberally shared around those involved in the Authorisation of a temporary licence for launch of the expensive, unproven, unsafe, deadly jabs.
I prefer to believe that all mRNA DEADLY INJECTIONS (called vaccines) do permanent irreparable damage to EVERY RECIPIENT! The makers want us all to believe post-injection injuries and DEATHS are "RARE". I believe that EVERY jab reduces the recipients natural immunity, making them more susceptible to many illnesses and diseases. Each extra jab reduced LIFE EXPECTANCY by 3 - 5 years.
Some are claiming the mRNA Gene Editing Experiments can eventually be expelled from the body. I believe this is more Pfizer, et al, propaganda to keep their lucrative gravy train on track. Vax damage is PERMANENT! DO NOT ACCEPT ANOTHER JAB UNTIL 'LIABILITY' IS REINTRODUCED! Common sense!
Using Coronavirus, the WEF went after our health in order to break our resolve, judgement, and to obtain total dominance of our will. Next in line is their modified Bird flu, which will justify Stage 2. By maximising existing viral diseases, Big Pharma & the chain they support, created a vast and highly profitable market of new customers experiencing their money making diseases.
VAX induced DEATHS are caused by the pretend injections that Moderna, Pfizer, FDA, CDC, etc, call 'vaccines'. These jabs are designed to frequently cause harm and to reduce LIFE EXPECTANCY.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) I'll live longer without medical intervention (AKA Pre-Meditated Mass-MURDER!)
I fully recognise, appreciate and agree with the idea that COVID-19 deaths reporting is largely fraudulent. However for the purposes of this rebuttal article, I'm simplifying the refutation by giving them the largest benefit of the doubt and showing that their 'deaths prevented' data is *still* completely fabricated even when measured against their own imaginary yardstick (I.E. the largest possible number of deaths *estimated*).
To put their gross exaggerated claim in perspective: they're claiming to have saved 8 times more people than even the worst possible set of deaths outcomes claimed to be purportedly COVID-19 during their self-proclaimed peak of 2020.
I appreciate your intention to portray a clear, unexaggerated picture of the truth (or as close to truth as possible) regarding man-enhanced virus borne illnesses, poorly created injections that can kill or main, which have little or no credibility when supposedly injected to SAVE LIVES.
I can no longer give credence to the avalanche of lies, inuendo, falsified evidence, criminal behaviour of Big Pharma, deliberate government incompetence, the flagrant abuse of Pfizer et al, pretending to market safe medicines which are supposedly created, tested and trialled for safety and made for our welfare, etc, etc,. Big Pharma is all about PROFIT! With, perhaps a tinge of DEPOPULATION for the New World Order?
You are on a difficult 'wicket' having to continue to stem your annoyance at the establishment's incompetence, skulduggery and deceit of public trust, when so much is at stake for our future freedom.
I'm not knocking your attempts to portray honesty in your fact findings. I've just taken the gloves off and have lost patients in fighting fair! They didn't, so why should we?
Keep up your level headed style while I will say it like I see it! We're fighting the same war!
Regards! Unjabbed Mick (UK) i'll live longer without mRNA poison included in 'vaccines'.
If I am not mistaken, the editors of a couple of the larger medical journals are on recorded as saying, in effect, that much of the "research" is so heavily biased by the funding source as to be worthless. It's not science at all by my (M.S.) understanding of the process.
This rebuttal article is aimed at a paper that is popularly being regurgitated amongst the various vaccine cultists in a desperate bid to try to make their shots look good. I figured I'd shoot it down as I recognise a lot of people aren't familiar with a lot of the underhanded tactics.
It's nearly always the same: cherry picking fallacies, distortions of datasets via selective processes, and outright fabrications.
Just finished your article and did indeed find it interesting. It seems that many people in the area I live in have taken their belief in science to a religious level. They have yard signs telling passers by that they believe. They probably haven't read your article, but probably would not want to hear what it says anyway - it would interfere with their belief.
Marcia Angell, MD was stepping down as editor of NEJM over 20 years ago, and said as much. I have since also seen PLOS (Public Library of Science) state that they estimate about half of what they publish has bias or outright fraud, but that they were unable to determine which half.
"In the May/June issue of the Boston Review, Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, details the sordid story of how corporate dollars have corrupted research and education at academic medical centers — including at her current place of employment, the Harvard Medical School.
The article is adapted from a talk she gave at Harvard last December. Angell, of course, has written about this topic many times before, most notably in her 2004 book, “The Truth About the Drug Companies.”
This was a really excellent article. I'm sure the vax is no good, as they all are--but a major issue is the huge increase in deaths in the US and elsewhere in 2020, pre-vax--which have many similarities to the post-vax deaths. The possibility of democide is obvious from the official mortality data itself, and the closer you look, the more obvious it gets.
The following is copied from the link I provided. Simply look at Note 4 for the specific citation. Let me know if you need more help.
"The authors of the Rancourt paper proposed 3 primary causes of excess deaths during the Covid years—none of which involved, at least on their face, any intent to kill—i.e., democide. These 3 causes were: (Note 4.)"
“(1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes.”
“(2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics).”
“(3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same Populations.”
Us proud Conspiracy Theorists realised the stats about Fauci's modified Covid were exaggerated beyond reality. The establishment used every evil method imaginable to exaggerate Covid impact.
When I hear Covid Death stats emanating from the 'Experts' enjoying financial benefits from the deadly injections called vaccines. I prefer to start with a mortality rate of ZERO until an old person is killed by remdesivir or intubation. I was all to justify profits from poorly planned injections (Vax?)
I stopped wearing a mask in mid 2020, when it suddenly dawned upon me that I was promoting a farce which would continue until people began telling others of their suspicions and beliefs. This was after realising that 'natural immunity' should protect the vast majority of us all. I'm 79 and in good health.
I then went on to defy all the unreasonable draconian 'Rules' that were imprisoning and silencing those of us prepared to disobey the 'Experts'. 'Early Covid science' seemed to be constantly modified to suit the 'Lock-Down' and 'distancing' rules. It seemed to me that I/we were being oppressed. I'd had enough! I realised that being a Conspiracy Theorist was, in reality, a badge of honour for those telling the truth.
After a few short months, the EXPERIMENTAL INJECTIONS they pretended were 'VACCINES' appeared.
'NO LIABILITY' for human DEATH by injection must mean the continuance of DEADLY mRNA injections ('vaccines') must cease immediately. They do NOTHING except reduce life expectancy and cause infertility! Perhaps that was the designated purpose of such useless 'medicines'?
The FDA, CDC, Big Pharma, all colluded to hide proven medicines like IVERMECTIN, etc, and hid such information in order to justify the lucrative spoils that were liberally shared around those involved in the Authorisation of a temporary licence for launch of the expensive, unproven, unsafe, deadly jabs.
I prefer to believe that all mRNA DEADLY INJECTIONS (called vaccines) do permanent irreparable damage to EVERY RECIPIENT! The makers want us all to believe post-injection injuries and DEATHS are "RARE". I believe that EVERY jab reduces the recipients natural immunity, making them more susceptible to many illnesses and diseases. Each extra jab reduced LIFE EXPECTANCY by 3 - 5 years.
Some are claiming the mRNA Gene Editing Experiments can eventually be expelled from the body. I believe this is more Pfizer, et al, propaganda to keep their lucrative gravy train on track. Vax damage is PERMANENT! DO NOT ACCEPT ANOTHER JAB UNTIL 'LIABILITY' IS REINTRODUCED! Common sense!
Using Coronavirus, the WEF went after our health in order to break our resolve, judgement, and to obtain total dominance of our will. Next in line is their modified Bird flu, which will justify Stage 2. By maximising existing viral diseases, Big Pharma & the chain they support, created a vast and highly profitable market of new customers experiencing their money making diseases.
VAX induced DEATHS are caused by the pretend injections that Moderna, Pfizer, FDA, CDC, etc, call 'vaccines'. These jabs are designed to frequently cause harm and to reduce LIFE EXPECTANCY.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) I'll live longer without medical intervention (AKA Pre-Meditated Mass-MURDER!)
I fully recognise, appreciate and agree with the idea that COVID-19 deaths reporting is largely fraudulent. However for the purposes of this rebuttal article, I'm simplifying the refutation by giving them the largest benefit of the doubt and showing that their 'deaths prevented' data is *still* completely fabricated even when measured against their own imaginary yardstick (I.E. the largest possible number of deaths *estimated*).
To put their gross exaggerated claim in perspective: they're claiming to have saved 8 times more people than even the worst possible set of deaths outcomes claimed to be purportedly COVID-19 during their self-proclaimed peak of 2020.
Thanks Underdog!
I appreciate your intention to portray a clear, unexaggerated picture of the truth (or as close to truth as possible) regarding man-enhanced virus borne illnesses, poorly created injections that can kill or main, which have little or no credibility when supposedly injected to SAVE LIVES.
I can no longer give credence to the avalanche of lies, inuendo, falsified evidence, criminal behaviour of Big Pharma, deliberate government incompetence, the flagrant abuse of Pfizer et al, pretending to market safe medicines which are supposedly created, tested and trialled for safety and made for our welfare, etc, etc,. Big Pharma is all about PROFIT! With, perhaps a tinge of DEPOPULATION for the New World Order?
You are on a difficult 'wicket' having to continue to stem your annoyance at the establishment's incompetence, skulduggery and deceit of public trust, when so much is at stake for our future freedom.
I'm not knocking your attempts to portray honesty in your fact findings. I've just taken the gloves off and have lost patients in fighting fair! They didn't, so why should we?
Keep up your level headed style while I will say it like I see it! We're fighting the same war!
Regards! Unjabbed Mick (UK) i'll live longer without mRNA poison included in 'vaccines'.
If I am not mistaken, the editors of a couple of the larger medical journals are on recorded as saying, in effect, that much of the "research" is so heavily biased by the funding source as to be worthless. It's not science at all by my (M.S.) understanding of the process.
You'll probably be very interested in the article "Peer Review Fraud Like Cardboard" which dives deeper into the fraudulent aspects of peer review:
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/peer-review-fraud-like-cardboard
This rebuttal article is aimed at a paper that is popularly being regurgitated amongst the various vaccine cultists in a desperate bid to try to make their shots look good. I figured I'd shoot it down as I recognise a lot of people aren't familiar with a lot of the underhanded tactics.
It's nearly always the same: cherry picking fallacies, distortions of datasets via selective processes, and outright fabrications.
Just finished your article and did indeed find it interesting. It seems that many people in the area I live in have taken their belief in science to a religious level. They have yard signs telling passers by that they believe. They probably haven't read your article, but probably would not want to hear what it says anyway - it would interfere with their belief.
Marcia Angell, MD was stepping down as editor of NEJM over 20 years ago, and said as much. I have since also seen PLOS (Public Library of Science) state that they estimate about half of what they publish has bias or outright fraud, but that they were unable to determine which half.
It's gotten way worse since them.
Below is just a snippet from this article where Marcia Angell lists 10 or so bullet points showing how & where "Medicine" has gone nutty: https://www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2010/05/ex-editor-nejm-tells-how-big-pharma-has-corrupted-academic-institutions/
Snip:
"In the May/June issue of the Boston Review, Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, details the sordid story of how corporate dollars have corrupted research and education at academic medical centers — including at her current place of employment, the Harvard Medical School.
The article is adapted from a talk she gave at Harvard last December. Angell, of course, has written about this topic many times before, most notably in her 2004 book, “The Truth About the Drug Companies.”
This was a really excellent article. I'm sure the vax is no good, as they all are--but a major issue is the huge increase in deaths in the US and elsewhere in 2020, pre-vax--which have many similarities to the post-vax deaths. The possibility of democide is obvious from the official mortality data itself, and the closer you look, the more obvious it gets.
See the Midazolam murders:
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/the-death-penalty-drugs-used-by-care
Likely one of many such causes. Still in use.
Not disputing iatrogenic deaths occurred--but the mortality data does not support the hypothesis they were primarily responsible for excess deaths--especially in the NYC mass casualty event of Spring 2020. I spell out the reasons here: https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2024/7/28/researchers-discover-reason-for-31-million-excess-deaths-worldwide-mistakes-were-made-l2any-j8egn
Who said they were primarily responsible?
For one, the authors of the article I reviewed in the link above.
This vagueness doesn't help clarify, so I'll be more specific.
You said: "but the mortality data does not support the hypothesis they were primarily responsible for excess deaths"
Where does it say that hypothesis? (Basically asking for an exact quote and a source, thanks).
The following is copied from the link I provided. Simply look at Note 4 for the specific citation. Let me know if you need more help.
"The authors of the Rancourt paper proposed 3 primary causes of excess deaths during the Covid years—none of which involved, at least on their face, any intent to kill—i.e., democide. These 3 causes were: (Note 4.)"
“(1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes.”
“(2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics).”
“(3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same Populations.”
They Lied. Join the campaign to Take Action & Raise Public Awareness at
https://TheyLied.ca/
.
Ways you can help Raise Public Awareness
https://theylied.ca/SpreadTheWord.shtml
.
Ways you can Take Action
https://theylied.ca/TakeAction.shtml
.
With your help, everyone will know TheyLied.ca
.
I’ve reached the point where I assume anything published in Nature is garbage until or unless proven otherwise.