Jan 26, 2023·edited Jan 26, 2023Liked by The Underdog
I know this has been talked about in terms of "theatre" and we're watching a staged event but now we have reached the satire stage.
The UK has just quietly announced no shots for the under 50s ,wonder if they will role out Witty etc to make it official and the statistics authority has said the ONS data "does not provide info on vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety and it should not be used in this way" Which Leeds you to what should it be used for?🍻🇬🇧
Oh , and why is it OK for the over 50s,based on what?????
"if they will role out Witty etc to make it official and the statistics authority has said the ONS data "does not provide info on vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety and it should not be used in this way""
I find it amusing shortly after I completely destroyed the vaccine industry's abuse of the ONS dataset to show the vaccines are harmful, did the data scientists (after 2 years, no less) all rushed out to declare the dataset to be faulty.
Also if you look at the ONS page now they have a nice little notice explaining why the dataset is mysteriously delayed barely a few days after I called it out. Watching them dance is fun!
Talking of satire , perhaps they could get them all on strictly come dancing or perhaps a BBC pantomime special for next Christmas, Covid19 and the vaxcines
oh, the endless fun🥳🍻🇬🇧
The channel four series Utopia seems to be the new reality🇬🇧🧚
"Do you think this guy is for real or is PV getting punked? Looks fishy."
Project Veritas are unbelievably stringent in their checking. They actually did consider the EMA leak documents, but required me to appear on camera to testify to their accuracy. As I was not the originator, but a Citizen Journalist, I had to decline the appearance.
It is very likely they acquired a copy of this man's resume and verified he works there. Project Veritas have gotten inside stories before - such as the HHS whistleblower and the Pfizer trial fraud whistleblower Brooke Johnson who is currently litigating against Pfizer.
Mutating viruses and experimenting with them isn't that radical a statement, and I encourage you to read The Daily Beagle's coverage of how vaccine manufacturers and researchers are responsible for viral outbreaks. This isn't some far flung speculation, but extremely well evidenced. Pirbright Institute were blamed for the 2007 outbreak of Foot and Mouth... and they went on to sell the vaccine for it to the US government!
It isn't the most absurd thing people have done and admitted to in regards to Project Veritas. They have a video of a teacher admitting to intentionally showing underage children dildos.
I think the public fail to grasp the depth of perversity within these various organisations and groups. The evil is beyond your comprehension, and if anything, the villains in James Bond movies are unambitious and tepid in their goals compared to the ruthless greed of corporations.
I cannot stress how depraved and evil they are. The vaccine passport was being worked upon before the pandemic occurred, and I would know, I was working on it. I do intend to disclose everything but being proper in research is a slow and arduous task.
A comment was made recently on a utube video that the digital ID was a done deal in 2017 and the current consultation is a nice piece of pr to placate the plebs👍
Catherine Watt Bailiwick news has an interesting take on the Project Veritas video.And Chris Morris is surely a script writer for so much of what is going on.
ID2020 is what you're referring to. It was initially tested in Texas as part of the Gavi institute. Gavi are a so-called "vaccine alliance" who form part of ID2020. Basically, biometric markers (including in vaccines) were proposed to keep track of the mass vaccinations. The implication is 'no person unvaccinated' in their medical tyranny.
Balliwick news cross-posted someone else's article, where they oddly remark they have been "told" (by whom?) to comment on the story, spreading unsubstantiated FUD on the story.
I would push back and suggest those trying to distance Pfizer from this crime against humanity are the ones trying to obfuscate. It seems the current agenda is to scapegoat the DoD for everything with minimal evidence to back up the claims, relying on a Goebbels-esque 'repetition of a lie becomes truth' approach.
I notice no-one will touch the evidence of vaccine labs being directly responsible for viral outbreaks with a paper trail a mile wide in their weird 'Pfizer are innocent, its just a joke, he made it up, blah blah blah' ramblings.
I wonder if a legal disposition would agree? I know Florida are gearing up for a lawsuit and finding Pfizer experimenting with viruses would be one hell of an explosive revelation.
Thank you for the detailed responses,it's appreciated.
No person unvaccinated is a nice slogan although perhaps a little sinister. ,it has the feeling of an endless repeating mantra as we all march off the cliff togeather.
And yes your right it was cross posted from Sasha Latypova and I understand the next point you raise.
Fauchi did a wonderful job of evading giving answers in the Florida court, it would appear he in his final years he was intirely unsuitable for office as he was senile come the end.Lets hope he has a happy and care free retirement.
Let's hope the lawsuit in Florida amounts to something👍
I hope you are right. You are always so alert and skeptical, so it's unlikely that you would automatically buy in if the story wasn't rock-solid. That's why I asked the question.
It all just seems too easily served up on a silver platter. The guy sounds like a sarcastic commenter on some Substack, using terminology that resonates with a lay person and not a scientist. And such a glib tongue - how did he land a prominent position being such a blabbermouth?
Here is someone who is presenting the argument that PV has been had:
"how did he land a prominent position being such a blabbermouth?"
Two things - one, when people want to impress another person they will brag and talk about most things. In-fact, it is likely they were guided to the subject. Two, he's drunk, so his inhibitions aren't there. I'm sure like the mainstream media, there's going to be every desperate effort to insist Pfizer are the pure snow white innocent angels and that someone else is responsible.
I find it interesting the pushback are from those trying to push the DARPA-NATO angle group without supplying much in the way of evidence. I've seen a lot of finger pointing at the DoD, but repetition of claims is not evidence. It tries to suggest pharmaceutical companies didn't make any Immunity to Liability agreements and aren't capable of viral research, which we both know, honestly, isn't true. They're more than capable.
After all, what is their response to the Foot and Mouth outbreak in 2007 at the Pirbright Institute, which is a vaccine manufacturing research building, and their subsequent sale of Foot and Mouth vaccines to the US government under a new company name? Pirbright were privately owned, based in the UK, no DoD involvement. Vague insinuations of 'DARPA involvement' aren't going to cut it as a counter-suggestion.
Also I am not familiar with what prior work George Webb has done that qualifies him as an investigative journalist? Did he manage to get either a Pfizer or DARPA or DoD or NATO whistleblower or set of documents to substantiate his claims?
You have to remember I'm staring at a copy of the mRNA instability documents from the EMA about the Pfizer shot, with a large pile of FOIA documents of Pfizers shots they fought tooth and nail not to publish to the side. I have not seen any documented evidence of DARPA anything, with the small exception of the funding for EcoHealth Alliance, which I might point out was published by DARPA itself.
I'm not saying that Pfizer isn't engaged in this activity, or is otherwise anything but guilty as sin for a long litany of offenses. Just that this particular hit video could be a setup to discredit PV. Color me skeptical, and I may be wrong, but it's hard to take anything at face value anymore, especially stuff that is so tuned to resonate with a group's confirmation bias. I just donated money to PV late last year, so I'm pulling for them to be right.
hey, this has a long-standing tradition. Like those firefighters who, coincidentally, always know where and when the next fire is going to be, and they'll be there right on time!
I know this has been talked about in terms of "theatre" and we're watching a staged event but now we have reached the satire stage.
The UK has just quietly announced no shots for the under 50s ,wonder if they will role out Witty etc to make it official and the statistics authority has said the ONS data "does not provide info on vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety and it should not be used in this way" Which Leeds you to what should it be used for?🍻🇬🇧
Oh , and why is it OK for the over 50s,based on what?????
"based on what?????"
Depopulation agenda and eugenics, see the 'Kanada's Aktion T4' article (https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/kanadas-aktion-t4).
"if they will role out Witty etc to make it official and the statistics authority has said the ONS data "does not provide info on vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety and it should not be used in this way""
I find it amusing shortly after I completely destroyed the vaccine industry's abuse of the ONS dataset to show the vaccines are harmful, did the data scientists (after 2 years, no less) all rushed out to declare the dataset to be faulty.
Also if you look at the ONS page now they have a nice little notice explaining why the dataset is mysteriously delayed barely a few days after I called it out. Watching them dance is fun!
Talking of satire , perhaps they could get them all on strictly come dancing or perhaps a BBC pantomime special for next Christmas, Covid19 and the vaxcines
oh, the endless fun🥳🍻🇬🇧
The channel four series Utopia seems to be the new reality🇬🇧🧚
Do you think this guy is for real or is PV getting punked? Looks fishy.
"Do you think this guy is for real or is PV getting punked? Looks fishy."
Project Veritas are unbelievably stringent in their checking. They actually did consider the EMA leak documents, but required me to appear on camera to testify to their accuracy. As I was not the originator, but a Citizen Journalist, I had to decline the appearance.
It is very likely they acquired a copy of this man's resume and verified he works there. Project Veritas have gotten inside stories before - such as the HHS whistleblower and the Pfizer trial fraud whistleblower Brooke Johnson who is currently litigating against Pfizer.
Mutating viruses and experimenting with them isn't that radical a statement, and I encourage you to read The Daily Beagle's coverage of how vaccine manufacturers and researchers are responsible for viral outbreaks. This isn't some far flung speculation, but extremely well evidenced. Pirbright Institute were blamed for the 2007 outbreak of Foot and Mouth... and they went on to sell the vaccine for it to the US government!
But the guy comes over as such a total nob that's the bit I struggle with.
Everything just seems to get more bizarre on a daily basis.
Chris Morris (British satirist) is well worth checking out Brass Eye ,Four Lions etc, it appears we are living in one of his productions.🥴
It isn't the most absurd thing people have done and admitted to in regards to Project Veritas. They have a video of a teacher admitting to intentionally showing underage children dildos.
I think the public fail to grasp the depth of perversity within these various organisations and groups. The evil is beyond your comprehension, and if anything, the villains in James Bond movies are unambitious and tepid in their goals compared to the ruthless greed of corporations.
I cannot stress how depraved and evil they are. The vaccine passport was being worked upon before the pandemic occurred, and I would know, I was working on it. I do intend to disclose everything but being proper in research is a slow and arduous task.
A comment was made recently on a utube video that the digital ID was a done deal in 2017 and the current consultation is a nice piece of pr to placate the plebs👍
Catherine Watt Bailiwick news has an interesting take on the Project Veritas video.And Chris Morris is surely a script writer for so much of what is going on.
ID2020 is what you're referring to. It was initially tested in Texas as part of the Gavi institute. Gavi are a so-called "vaccine alliance" who form part of ID2020. Basically, biometric markers (including in vaccines) were proposed to keep track of the mass vaccinations. The implication is 'no person unvaccinated' in their medical tyranny.
Balliwick news cross-posted someone else's article, where they oddly remark they have been "told" (by whom?) to comment on the story, spreading unsubstantiated FUD on the story.
I would push back and suggest those trying to distance Pfizer from this crime against humanity are the ones trying to obfuscate. It seems the current agenda is to scapegoat the DoD for everything with minimal evidence to back up the claims, relying on a Goebbels-esque 'repetition of a lie becomes truth' approach.
I notice no-one will touch the evidence of vaccine labs being directly responsible for viral outbreaks with a paper trail a mile wide in their weird 'Pfizer are innocent, its just a joke, he made it up, blah blah blah' ramblings.
I wonder if a legal disposition would agree? I know Florida are gearing up for a lawsuit and finding Pfizer experimenting with viruses would be one hell of an explosive revelation.
Thank you for the detailed responses,it's appreciated.
No person unvaccinated is a nice slogan although perhaps a little sinister. ,it has the feeling of an endless repeating mantra as we all march off the cliff togeather.
And yes your right it was cross posted from Sasha Latypova and I understand the next point you raise.
Fauchi did a wonderful job of evading giving answers in the Florida court, it would appear he in his final years he was intirely unsuitable for office as he was senile come the end.Lets hope he has a happy and care free retirement.
Let's hope the lawsuit in Florida amounts to something👍
I hope you are right. You are always so alert and skeptical, so it's unlikely that you would automatically buy in if the story wasn't rock-solid. That's why I asked the question.
It all just seems too easily served up on a silver platter. The guy sounds like a sarcastic commenter on some Substack, using terminology that resonates with a lay person and not a scientist. And such a glib tongue - how did he land a prominent position being such a blabbermouth?
Here is someone who is presenting the argument that PV has been had:
https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1618452536817782788?s=20&t=hum1_AjfqiJHSqdea93YgA&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
"how did he land a prominent position being such a blabbermouth?"
Two things - one, when people want to impress another person they will brag and talk about most things. In-fact, it is likely they were guided to the subject. Two, he's drunk, so his inhibitions aren't there. I'm sure like the mainstream media, there's going to be every desperate effort to insist Pfizer are the pure snow white innocent angels and that someone else is responsible.
I find it interesting the pushback are from those trying to push the DARPA-NATO angle group without supplying much in the way of evidence. I've seen a lot of finger pointing at the DoD, but repetition of claims is not evidence. It tries to suggest pharmaceutical companies didn't make any Immunity to Liability agreements and aren't capable of viral research, which we both know, honestly, isn't true. They're more than capable.
After all, what is their response to the Foot and Mouth outbreak in 2007 at the Pirbright Institute, which is a vaccine manufacturing research building, and their subsequent sale of Foot and Mouth vaccines to the US government under a new company name? Pirbright were privately owned, based in the UK, no DoD involvement. Vague insinuations of 'DARPA involvement' aren't going to cut it as a counter-suggestion.
Also I am not familiar with what prior work George Webb has done that qualifies him as an investigative journalist? Did he manage to get either a Pfizer or DARPA or DoD or NATO whistleblower or set of documents to substantiate his claims?
You have to remember I'm staring at a copy of the mRNA instability documents from the EMA about the Pfizer shot, with a large pile of FOIA documents of Pfizers shots they fought tooth and nail not to publish to the side. I have not seen any documented evidence of DARPA anything, with the small exception of the funding for EcoHealth Alliance, which I might point out was published by DARPA itself.
I'm not saying that Pfizer isn't engaged in this activity, or is otherwise anything but guilty as sin for a long litany of offenses. Just that this particular hit video could be a setup to discredit PV. Color me skeptical, and I may be wrong, but it's hard to take anything at face value anymore, especially stuff that is so tuned to resonate with a group's confirmation bias. I just donated money to PV late last year, so I'm pulling for them to be right.
Google have mass-censored PV in response, take a look:
https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1618684472702160896
Yes, I saw that, but the video WAS on Google's YouTube, at least as of 15 hours ago.
Anyway, this guy thinks PV did its homework before publishing:
https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker
Yeah, thought the same thing👍
hey, this has a long-standing tradition. Like those firefighters who, coincidentally, always know where and when the next fire is going to be, and they'll be there right on time!