Political Sleeper Cell Goes Live

It is all in the wording

You likely may have noticed recently that Ron DeSantis sent a mere 53 migrants to Martha’s Vineyard (which Breitbart described as “planes full”). Martha’s Vineyard called the 53 migrants - a drop in the ocean to the thousands seen daily at border towns - a “humanitarian crisis”. California Governor Gavin Newsom declared in response there would be a ‘kidnapping investigation’, as Ron DeSantis declared he’d send even more.

Who would heed Gavin Newsom’s call? A little known Bexar, Texas sheriff Javier Salazar. Ignoring the fact he does not have jurisdiction in Florida, the Sheriff gave the game away when he spoke a certain set of words:

Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar said the investigation will look into the suspected activities of a Venezuelan being paid a “bird dog fee to recruit” the illegal immigrants from an area around a San Antonio migrant resource center to go to Florida.

The words are “bird dog”, and reveals he is, in-fact, a member of a Democratic political sleeper cell. The awkwardly shoehorned in words signal he’s on on their team.

Now, I’m aware people are likely skeptical, but to prove this you’d need to read the leaked “Strategic Plan for Action” by David Brock for MediaMatters.

MediaMatters But Facts Don’t

MediaMatters are the Democrat political activist arm - you might be more familair with their website which espouses Democrat propaganda, however this “Strategic Plan for Action” is subversive, advocating suppression of dissenting views (tarbrushed as ‘misinformation’ with no proof), disrupting market operations of media outlets they don’t like, shilling on social media boards via ‘Shareblue’, spying on and datamining the public, digging up ancient dirt on opposition candidates in order to discredit - whilst maintaining a 16 terabyte database of various compromising material in which to manipulate opposition with.

The document also notes how MediaMatters is partnered with American Bridge - yet another sockpuppet arm of the Democrat party - whose operative physically assaulted a female Republican, after attempts to goad her into physical retaliation failed (this was amongst a general trend of physical violence against Republicans). The document is evidence that Democrats engage in political sleeper cells.

No-one who supports democracy should be comfortable with such subversive actions. So when we point to this document and the tactics utilised, you know you’re dealing with an underhanded, evil group.

Bird Dogging

David Brock - the same author as the “Strategic Plan for Action” - even publicly discusses the term “bird dogging” on C-SPAN, where the interviewer comments:

[…] so this bird dogging idea is very fascinating […]

At which point Democrat David Brock goes on to explain the term. He tries to paint it as simply asking questions:

“Bird dogging” (alt. ‘birddogging’) is their politically correct, Democrat way of saying harassment (like the violence visited upon females like AmericanBridge did). They harass (‘birddog’) people.

Project Veritas had previously covered such a terms usage in undercover reporting. An undercover report which triggered the Democrats so strongly they filed lawsuit:

[…] In that case, Teter was claiming that Project Veritas had caused her damage by releasing a video of Scott Foval naming her as a “birddog,” an agent in support of the Clinton campaign inciting a disturbance at a Trump campaign rally in 2016. […]

Notice Veritas description: “birddog” - an agent in support. And it isn’t purely restricted to attacking Republicans. Breitbart reported how Democrats harassed (“birddog”) Democrat Kyrsten Sinema for not towing the Democrat line.

However, the original term means to track:

To follow a subject of interest, such as a person or trend, with persistent attention.

But, if you refer back to the “Strategic Plan for Action”, they already have a term for tracking. It is called watchdogging. No, I don’t know why they’re obsessed with the phrase “dogging” either.

The Sheriff’s usage of the term (at the 1:43 mark onwards), clearly suggests he means harassment, not tracking (as tracking is passive; it would not involve recruitment):

[…] our understanding, is that, a Venezeulan migrant was paid a... a... what we'll call a "bird dog fee" to recruit approximately 50 migrants from the area around a migrant resource center […]

Because a ‘track fee to recruit’ doesn’t make much sense. You can’t both track a person and recruit them simultaneously.

We can also strongly infer he’s a Democrat sleeper cell member given the context of the situation - Gavin Newsom - a Democrat - asks ‘will someone investigate Ron DeSantis’ and this random Texan Sheriff suddenly pops up, blurts out the Democrat’s favourite phrase “bird dog” and off he goes.

Indeed, we can reinforce this by looking up Javier Salazar on Ballotpedia, where, surprise, it clearly shows he is a member of the Democrat party:

This would mean he is abusing his police powers in order to enforce a politically motivated attack on another political member (who is outside of his jurisdiction, note).

This would likely fall under Texas Penal Code Sec. 39.03: Official Oppression, which states that:

(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:

(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;

(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; […]

Texan Sheriffs are also subject to complaints to the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, and the appearance of impropriety, as well as the abuse of due process in order to further one’s own political objectives would likely be a valid grounds for complaint.

Texan judges are required to avoid an appearance of improprietary, so it stands to reason a Texas sheriff should also. This subversive political nature and abuse of power by police officers should not be tolerated. Never forget Uvalde.

Daily Beagle’s is still a long way off from becoming financially viable, consider becoming a paying subscriber today!

Share this article and encourage others to subscribe!

What’s your views on the police corruption?