We should all contact our MPs, keep it simple and direct:
The product is NOT safe and effective,
No prior testing is required under emergency use authorisation
It stated on the NHS website that effects on Human reproduction were not known and yet recommended the product to expecting mothers.
There classed as "novel" (so how are they safe) gene therapy,. under Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products ATMPS and never mentioned this to the trial subjects.
The trial started when the product roll out started.
As stated in the EU parliament they don't stop transmission and never did.
The whole thing is FRAUDULENT and they need to be told.👍
I think his cautious approach is beneficial because it is a softer touch that better suits his sort of audience, who are going to have a hard time accepting the conga line of lies they have been fed by the industry over many decades.
Completely agree ,it's a case of waking as many up as possible and as you say a tactful approach will get the greatest benefit.
When his channel first started I posted my concerns and let's just say his audience at that time were not overly receptive.I read the comments now and there has been a complete reversal and his audience keeps growing.
The one agency they’re afraid of is the SEC.
We should all contact our MPs, keep it simple and direct:
The product is NOT safe and effective,
No prior testing is required under emergency use authorisation
It stated on the NHS website that effects on Human reproduction were not known and yet recommended the product to expecting mothers.
There classed as "novel" (so how are they safe) gene therapy,. under Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products ATMPS and never mentioned this to the trial subjects.
The trial started when the product roll out started.
As stated in the EU parliament they don't stop transmission and never did.
The whole thing is FRAUDULENT and they need to be told.👍
I remember when this all kicked watching John Campbell and he was a total believer in the narative provided as so many were.
He did mention that he had an adverse reaction to a booster and has not been the same man since.
Have gained respect for him over the months , he treads a careful line but better that than being shut down by the thought police.
I think his cautious approach is beneficial because it is a softer touch that better suits his sort of audience, who are going to have a hard time accepting the conga line of lies they have been fed by the industry over many decades.
Completely agree ,it's a case of waking as many up as possible and as you say a tactful approach will get the greatest benefit.
When his channel first started I posted my concerns and let's just say his audience at that time were not overly receptive.I read the comments now and there has been a complete reversal and his audience keeps growing.