6 Comments
founding
Oct 28, 2022Liked by The Underdog

I feel very proud that, as a subscriber, I was a tiny part of supporting your research on this! But I strongly hope you also do spend the money on food too. Cheers! 🍲🥘🍛🥧🍺

Expand full comment
author

I endeavour to ensure money is spent most appropriately in relation to my work. Besides, I can subtract it as a business expense meaning I don't lose the funds to tax (not that I earn enough currently to meet any tax thresholds).

Expand full comment

Fauci's desperately trying to 'water the meaning down' for Gain of Function before he 'Moves onto his next venture'. Covid has caused various words to be re-defined to suit the disease and the INJECTION

they still want to call a 'VACCINE'. Before 2021 Vaccine used to be defined as a CURE but now they've diluted the meaning because IT DOESN'T and probably was never going to. Just like the previous Vax for Swine Flu which Big Pharma demanded that if they release their newly prepared 'vaccine' they wanted IMMUNITY from LIABILITY in relation to Vax induced injuries and VAX DEATHS! Gerald Ford agreed to a Temporary cessation of LIABILITY for the 'EXPERIMENT'. After 50+ US citizens died following the experimental injections the 'Experiment' was stopped. But 'Temporary' mysteriously became 'Permanent' and the 'LICENCE TO KILL' remains applicable to this day = 45 years later. Common Sense demands that LIABILITY be reinstated especially now Millions are Dying post Covid Vax. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to fight on!

Expand full comment
author

From a legal standpoint, nailing the definition down is crucial because it defines whether or not someone was in violation of the pause.

It is clearly evident to me that the NIH tout an incorrect definition - one that does not match the 2014 pause - and this incorrect definition has been adopted by the NIAID, and then further modified by Peter Daszak. There seems to be a word-of-mouth thing occurring, because Francis Collins' definition nearly mirrors that of Peter Daszak's definition - long after Daszak made the assertion. This is despite the fact it does not accurately reflect the 2014 gain-of-function definition.

There is evidence of legal breaches, criminality and thus culpability by various individuals, with grounds for prosecution. I hope this article clarifies where the deception and misleading material lies sufficient that the public can see how the attempts to pull the wool over their eyes in terms of legal culpability is being done.

Expand full comment

Perhaps they really mean; 'Gain of Function' = Harvesting and Modifying a dangerous virus to establish just how deadly it can be for humans? (Then (accidentally) releasing it while you're completing some (useless) money making poison (called vaccines) in the adjacent lab)?

Also, 'F*#k PayPal' for jumping the gun, without Adolf Schwab's say so, with $2500 fines for insubordination of criticism of WEF long term plans for Depopulation by injections and Slavery. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and ready!

Expand full comment
author
Oct 29, 2022·edited Oct 29, 2022Author

There will be an exposé on the virus outbreaks and origins, which I feel people will find both surprising and also not surprising. I do have to write a few other articles first in order to lay the groundwork for it, and this is one of them. Keep an eye out for them in the coming days!

Expand full comment