I will have to firstly apologise for not keeping schedule, I have been pondering how viable The Daily Beagle truly is at length. I must also apologise I did not do the toxic mask article. Someone took the masks I was going to examine under a microscope, and then when I got another set, they didn’t have the toxic material. It was micro-plastics, by the way, and it appears also on cotton wool buds and in processed American cheese. I imagine the article wouldn’t have garnered more than 5 likes given trends anyway.
I’ve taken the liberty of pausing the subscription billing on Substack, and I’ll be withdrawing my services. Commentators let me know if any subscription still re-occurs as I have never used this feature before and Substack is notoriously buggy. Feel free to file refund requests, I am officially done. The Daily Beagle requires too much effort, and as I’ve said before on nearly every recent post, is not financially viable.
It operates at a loss for me, the time I spend here is time I could spend in a full time job grinding away for the Machine. This is during an economic downturn.
I genuinely don’t understand the human race. They claim to want facts, and I poured months of research into exposing the connections between vaccine manufacturers and outbreaks, having sorted the research in the form of a timeline of events spanning 256 articles, with the article getting four likes, fewer views, and one unsubscription from a paying subscriber.
Meanwhile, the coverage of Twitter - a single day’s worth of arguably “lazy” effort (lazy at least compared to the weeks and months of legwork of other projects) - got more likes, more shares and more views. Maybe a more shrewd business person could lean into this phenomena, but I am no businessman.
I cannot in good conscience stoop to constantly writing non-stop churnalism about repeated rhetoric that dozens of other outlets have already covered. I feel bad for joining the conga line, and disappointed this is how society operates.
Comparing The Daily Beagle’s progress with other Substacks that have existed for a similar length of time, it seems to have gained less in all domains, even if more effort was put in. Effort and hard work is not rewarded; some of the worst performing articles are the ones with the largest amount of work put into them.
It seems people only want Substacks that reinforce, rather than defy or explore, worldviews, even within the supposedly ‘rebellious’ groups. A ‘less thinking, more repeating’ attitude seems to prevail in all social circles. Time I spend repeating popular topics is time I don’t spend informing of the truth, or creating real reporting.
People don’t want real reporting, though. They love the drama, the politics, the distractions, the petty fights and insults on places like Twitter. I personally thought it was due to a lack of meaningful alternatives, but realistically, alternatives always have existed in one form or another… people intentionally avoid them.
I’m starting to see the world’s problems as a natural consequence of public action coupled with abject denial by the public to accept their apathy and inaction is what enables it to happen.
People say they want free speech but avoid places like Gab, they claim they hate politics but then talk all day on articles that are entirely political, they want integrity in politics but don’t want to put in any effort to hold anyone to account, they oddly expect politicians - the government - to hold themselves - the government - to account.
It baffles me how many times people can metaphorically hit their head. Already now there are people screaming for Republicans to investigate as if they naively believe the people who voted in Ukrainian aid to financial yet another MIC proxy war was ever going to do anything for them. Only four people voted against the Patriot Act. This fact never hammers home. The implications: both parties hate you.
I write this having seen, once again, revolt virtue signalling on numerous boards and discussion groups, where commentators who try-hard talking about all the lamppost hangings and gallows building they will be doing in their circlejerk fantasies of stopping globalists, whilst in reality, achieving nothing.
I genuinely do not understand, why do you people lie? To yourselves and each other? Not one of you has built any gallows and I don’t get what this pointless obsession is with talking about it in public is?
Why do you boldly proclaim heroic acts online and then timidly do nothing? Why do you say you want the facts, when the success of many outlets online says you actually prefer distracting light entertainment? You say you support free speech but then when it is challenged don’t do anything. Children were murdered by poison shot and all I see is heartbreaking passivity in the public.
I saw only one true act of courage in the last five years and it was a man admitting publicly he was too afraid to revolt, that he fears that if he revolted, he’d be alone, and everyone would be against him. True bravery is admitting flaws as to why you cannot, not inventing bravado scenarios. The first step to overcoming a problem is admitting it.
And I’m admitting it here. The Daily Beagle is not financially viable. I’m not asking for money now, however, because the metadata tells me it is because what The Daily Beagle writes about - the unpleasant truth - isn’t what people truly want.
People want to live in a world where nuclear power is magically safe, the most serious threat is how many people Elon can insult whilst people bizarrely cheer him on, even as he lies about being a Free Speech Absolutist, keeping Alex Jones banned and ‘having to think’ about unbanning Donald Trump (I am no fan of Trump having betrayed Patriotic Americans, but if one proclaims they’re pro-free speech then their actions should align with their words).
I could devolve to churnalism, but, I won’t. I love the truth too much. I cannot afford to run a publication telling people the truth if it means I lose paying subscribers every time I do so. These things take effort and time, and cannot be simply placed around a full time job. Uou can do that with light entertainment, but research, no. Reading 256 articles, cross-referencing data and then compiling it in an organised format takes time, and is a full time job.
The extensive investment of time does not merit the lacklusture returns, and, once again, I am thrown back into the jaws of the Deep State. I will become broke and starve long before The Daily Beagle becomes financially viable.
The Daily Beagle is not financially viable, and now, never will be.
Hi!
For one thing, I think you understand the human race perfectly.
And I'm sorry to say, so do I.
If you remember, I'm this French speaking blogger (skidmark.blog) with more than 350 posts under his belt - although a good part of them are translations, which sometimes take up more time than my own writings. I'm a 58 years old guy with a grueling full-time job. I have at least 300 tabs open on my browser at any time. Never monetized anything. My blog took over my life.
I sometimes put more than thirty hours into an article that will draw less than twenty people. Sometimes someone catches up later, promotes it on some place - something I never do myself, I'm not on *any* social platform - and boom, it spreads like wildfire. Sometimes.
My blog is maybe the best resource in the French language - there, I said it. I should have thousands of suscribers. I have 27. I should get hundreds of thousands views a month. I get less than two hundred.
In more than two years, I got less than ten comments total. I have a fan in Bolivia, though, of all places. He even wrote me a Christmas message last year. I sometimes think about him when I'm not sure about what to write.
Just to convene the idea that you're not alone in this, the quote under the title of my blog is "Trying to save a world that does not want to be saved". No one has ever asked where that quote comes from. Well, I can tell you. It was from a mom I once saw in a video, who lost her son to the Irak war. She was trying to wake people up. She was talking to people on the street. Nobody cared.
The truth is, people like a good story. With a hero, a villain, and possibly a happy ending. Most of them still like to watch television. If they do, I don't even try anymore. I've realized some time ago that most of them are beyond help.
I've been through times of discouragement. Then the next day, I'd see a kid on the street, his eyes full of hope and wonderment. Sometimes a kid waves hello, because I'm such an impressive sight riding my scooter, so I wave back. When I come home I just sit back again in front of my computer and type away.
That's my life now. My life during wartime. Because I haven't been a good man, I probably deserve it.
They don't.
"A man has done what he must when he has done what he could." Pr Henri Joyeux
I'm feel very sorry at your obvious disappointment about the results of your articles, after all of your hard work. My heart genuinely goes out to you - especially when you are clearly a person of very high moral standards, who wanted to do something to try to improve the world.
Having myself had a very 'up and down' life, sometimes pretty wealthy or pretty happy, and other times the opposite of either or both, and having also worked very hard sometimes to build something, sometimes succeeding, and sometimes failing, I greatly sympathize with the intense disappointment and disillusionment that you must be feeling now.
However, chiche though it may be, when I look back on my very up and down life, it really did always happen - sometimes almost immediately, and sometimes after a period of time, that after every great disappointment or disaster that I experienced in my life, that something very good followed such painful events.
And I am absolutely sure that the same will be true for you. You are, clearly, a very intelligent, principled and disciplined person - and such personal characteristics absolutely guarantee that something good for you will pretty quickly follow this disappointment with the Beagle.
So - I suggest that you treat it as a blip, which is going to lead on to great things, which will come very soon! I say that absolutely sincerely: someone with your talents is not going to be down for long.
I incidentally totally agree with your comments about Elon Tusk: if he was the 'free speech absolutist' that he claims to be, he would be saying that absolutely anyone can come on Twitter and express their political opinions.
By saying 'no' to Alex Jones, and debating whether or not Trump (or anyone else) should be allowed on Twitter, and by talking about limiting some people's 'reach' (i.e., shadow banning them), he clearly has no intention of allowing Twitter to become a free speech platform. I agree with others, that it appears likely that he bought Twitter to serve as a vehicle for him to launch something Orwellian and all-embracing like China's 'Wechat'.
Anyway - very best of luck to you for the future! Please don't be downhearted: this is just a blip - and you may look back on it as an essential experience without which you would never have thought of the XYZ success story which you are going to enjoy sooner, perhaps, than would seem possible right now, when you're feeling temporarily down!
My two cents' worth about articles on politics, the Covid 'vaccines', or whatever, is that most of them infuriate me by not putting the key points of what they want to say in clear, simple English at the to top of the article. This applies not just to written articles - but to so many videos that people make.
People are willing to spend time reading something containing a level of detail - but to get big viewing / readership numbers, it has to be something attention-grabbing, straightforward and clear right at the beginning - and thereafter, to expand on each of those key points as concisely as possible.
Obvious, perhaps - but true. That comment is not, incidentally, made with reference to your articles - but just as a general observation.
Best of luck,
Richard